Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Smithfield, North Carolina Police May Ignore '911' Calls If Not Provided More Gas Money

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
one_voice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 11:22 AM
Original message
Smithfield, North Carolina Police May Ignore '911' Calls If Not Provided More Gas Money
In one North Carolina town, some residents may not get an answer to their 911 calls because the police are running out of gas money.

In a town council meeting Tuesday night, Smithfield, North Carolina Police Chief Michael Scott will ask officials to let him use $30,000 meant for office supplies to buy gas for patrol cars, the Raleigh News and Observer reports. If he doesn't get the money, Smith said the police force may stop responding to some 911 calls and investigating misdemeanors because he's already cut patrols.

Smithfield isn't the only town looking for ways to cut costs to contend with budget woes. High unemployment and a struggling housing market have pushed more than half of U.S. cities to cut staff, boost fees or cancel infrastructure projects, according to the National League of Cities. The situation has gotten so dire that deep state and local budget cuts may be slowing U.S. economic growth, according to The Associated Press.

City officials in Allen Park, Michigan, a suburb of Detroit, announced Tuesday that they would lay off more than 30 police officers, firefighters and city workers, the Detroit Free Press reports. In Santa Ana, California a budget analysis found that the city may need to take steps including closing some fire stations at night to close a projected $30 million budget gap, according to Voice of OC.

*snip*

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/01/smithfield-north-carolina-police-gas-money_n_1069470.html?ref=business&icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl3|sec1_lnk2|109407
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. I do hope the police departmens who are ravaging the #Occupiers run out of money...
...not enough money for this, not enough money for that...our heads are up our asses if money is the limiting factor to filling human need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. ass, gas, or grass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like a win-win for all parties involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. If there is a 911 system in place, there is a duty to provide for response.
And that certainly includes providing the gas money so responders can respond.

As to closing fire stations at night, all a locality has to do is to arrange for no fires to break out at night. ;-)

What's destroying the country is not a set of budget deficits, it's a set of political yahoos who proclaim government to be the enemy, so don't find ways to fund essential services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Legally, no.
Edited on Wed Nov-02-11 01:02 PM by Xithras
Warren v. District of Columbia. The police have no duty to respond to emergency calls or to protect citizens from harm. Many states (including my own home state of California) go even further, and have laws in place specifically removing any liability from police departments who fail to respond or protect. You can call them 50 times about a murderer being in your house, and there is no legal requirement that they respond. According to the federal judiciary, if that murderer kills you and your family sues, they won't even be entitled to any compensation, because the government is not liable for damages caused by third party criminal acts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. a great time to knock over the Ava Gardner museum -
some of those costumes are scrumptious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC