Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cain wins big in South Carolina tea party straw poll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
In Other News Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 04:11 PM
Original message
Cain wins big in South Carolina tea party straw poll
Source: CNN

Las Vegas, Nevada (CNN) - Surging Republican presidential contender Herman Cain has picked up another morale booster in the race for the GOP nomination.

The conservative businessman decisively won a tea party straw poll held in Columbia, South Carolina, Saturday afternoon.

Cain captured an eye-popping 55% of the vote. His closest challenger, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, picked up 14.5%. Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann garnered 8% to come in third.

Read more: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/15/cain-wins-big-in-south-carolina-tea-party-straw-poll/?hpt=po_bn1



I've only posted three paragraphs of this story, as the entirety consisted of six.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tea Party poll. Hehe.
Yeah, that's big news.

Like being proclaimed "Biggest nut in the cocktail mix"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. What's interesting
is not only the lack of TP support for Romney (no surprise), but the fact that Perry couldn't even get 8% in this poll. Frankly, that amazes me, and while Perry has probably written off Iowa, and certainly New Hampshire, his whole strategy depends on winning South Carolina.

There's a decent chance that might not happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Other News Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Perry writing off Iowa?
Don't you mean Romney? After all, the IRP is heavily influenced by fundamentalist Christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. From my readings, he's not putting a terribly major emphasis there
Of course, he'd like to do well there, but it's my impression that he plans to run the table in the South. That should finish off Bachmann, if she's still been drawing oxygen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Other News Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. But it's Perry's natural turf...
Romney is expected to win New Hampshire. If Perry wants the nom, he has to buttress against Mitt beforehand.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. Yes, he'd like that
But it's not gonna happen:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/ia/iowa_republican_presidential_primary-1588.html

He's polling just barely north of Newtie right now. Frankly, Midwestern Repukes are not like Southern Repukes, and even Perry knows it. The primary/caucus calendar seems to favor the latter type of Neanderthal.

If Perry can give up Iowa to Cain, or even a resurrected Bachmann (little joke there!), he'll be happy, because he knows neither one of them can do well in the South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cain is cleaning up. Romney's money won't help since the base has dropped him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4.  AlinPA
AlinPA

To be honest. I doubt "the base" really was so into Romney at all.. He are not that extreme as they want it

Diclotican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You are correct. He never had the base behind him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. He's got two insurmoutable problems
First is his reputation as a flip-flopper, willing to say whatever he needs to, to get elected. The tea partiers tend to be purists, and while they might ignore one or two little missteps, enough of Romney's Massachusetts campaigns are on You Tube for them to overlook the pile of feints he's made to the left.

The other is his religion, and not only will the fundies never vote for him in the primaries, they'll vote for a religious third party candidate in November, even if it means having Obama for another four years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Three insurmountable problems
The thing the Repukes call Obamacare, specifically the mandate, was inspired by Romney's Massachusetts healthcare plan.

Even though Romney is the only person over there who...okay, fuck it, he's the only Republican currently running for president who is sane enough to be acceptable to anyone who isn't in the very, very narrow slice of the political spectrum called Tea Party Nation...the teabaggers will NOT allow the voters to choose between the guy who signed Obamacare and the guy who gave him the idea for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. He has four insurmountable problems
Edited on Sun Oct-16-11 07:20 PM by GoCubsGo
Before he was Governor of MA, he made a living buying and merging corporations. In the process of making them "leaner and meaner", he put thousands of people out of work. He was a corporate raider. That will not go over well with many. In addition, one of the latest headlines at Huffington Post indicates that he's already collecting far more donations from Wall St. than is President Obama. The die-hard, I-only-vote-republican types will likely turn a blind eye to that, but I doubt the rest will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Romney's time as a corporate raider and his destroying jobs and lives
ultimately will be what does him in. Romney loves to mention his Staples success, but that was small in jobs compared to ones Romney destroyed. Plus Staples jobs are minimum wage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #22
35. Yes, that last one is a problem in the general election
but I don't think it means squat as far as his getting the nomination goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
33. customerserviceguy
Edited on Mon Oct-17-11 05:05 AM by Diclotican
customerserviceguy

True, mr Romney is a person who easy flip flop, when needed.. Maybe he is smarter than most of the right this days.. It is better to compromise, than to never get anything been doing.. And he have had the disadvange of been couth on camera... Youtube is the enemy of most politicans this days... But that maybe also wil keep many politicans honest - or at least not as lying as they often are..

And the other big issue is the LDS membership. The "fundies" would never vote for a member of the LDS church, for many, the LDS shurch is a "cult" and therefore more dangrous than having a black man in the Hvite house (pun intended, as many of them was horrified that Obama was voted President in 2008)

But then, Romney at least, have a little chance against Obama.. The other foregrunners have no chance in hell, against the sitting President.. Even if he treat them with far more respect than they deserve, the sitting president, wil murder them in debates... Not that I honesty belive ROnney vil be the next president of the United States... I rather doubt it..

Diclotican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Republicans have been a solid 77% "Not Romney"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. What does that matter to an electronic voting machine with proprietary software?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is shaping up to a brokered convention, I think.
No one seems to have a plurality, nor all of the necessary attributes to get the Republican voter to coalesce around. Each candidate seems to have "non-starter" fatal flaws with substantial segments of these voters. If the current crop of losers stumble their way into the convention, spltting and holding < than 20% of the committed candidates, it could provide lots of entertainment - ideological purges/extreme litmus tests, scapegoating various voter segments, walkouts, and 3rd party formations. Sets up someone new to arrive on the scene and become the de facto standard bearer. And that solution could still piss off every primary voter who sees their candidate picked by TPTB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Other News Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I think you're on to something.....
Not being an American, I've been reluctant to express my suspicion that the convention in Tampa might very well be deadlocked, paving the way for a "savior," whom I strongly suspect might be a former Florida governor...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abogado Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Well, I'm an American (aren't Canadians Americans too?) and I think you are exactly right
If Romney doesn't make some miraculous comeback in the coming 9 months, I do think some Deus Ex Machina will come out of the woodwork. And yes, it could even be Jeb. EEEK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
workinclasszero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. Whoa! You might be onto something there!
Jeb will save the day!:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
36. I don't think so.
I think Jeb and any other possible candidates still tethered to reality are keeping their powder dry until 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. You mean the "Tea Party" would vote for a Black South Carolina Candidate?"
I thought that the whole South of the US hated Barack Obama because he was Black?

What's going on here? RW Racist beating Dems at their own game?

It's pure crap from Tea Party, of course, but they SURE AS HELL KNOW how TO CORRUPT Parties and MESSAGE...don't they?

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Yap, GOP convention in 2012 will be humdinger n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. WOW! Sure throws that "Racist SC'linians Meme" outta the window that Tea Party is Racist
and that's why they don't like Barack Obama.

Amazing. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Now it's "who's the biggest shill for Koch Industries"?
Apparently Romney, Bachmann, Palin, and everyone else didn't have it, but as a former member of AFP - Cain has it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yeah...It mus t be KOCH WARS ARISING! All be BE AWARE!
Edited on Sun Oct-16-11 06:43 PM by KoKo
:eyes: Reminds me of the "Mellon - Scaife" Scare when Clinton was under Impeachment.

things get weird...more weird and then "Go Out to Space!" :eyes: :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. They probably think he is one of the "good ones".
You ever been to SC? I have some property there. And being in my mid 40s, white, about 6 foot tall, and a bit thicker in the middle, I look like I fit in with the tea party folks. And you might be surprised at what they will say when they think you are one of them.

Conservative racists don't attack all blacks ... unless they speak out against entrenched white interests. They also know that they need to watch their language so that they can act surprised when something they say, other than the n-word, is perceived as racist. From their point of view, if you don't use the n-word, then no one can prove you are a racist. You can use almost any other adjectives, just not the n-word.

Of course they are PISSED they can't use the n-word ... they HATE having to come up with new dog whistles. The n-word gave them so much power. And they miss that power.

As for the GOP embracing blacks .... let's consider Colin Powell. He was an up and coming black Republican. Conservative. War hero. His name was thrown around as a VP or even Presidential GOP candidate. He was "one of the good ones".

But he voted for Obama over McCain. And he said so out loud. And suddenly, Limbaugh, the mouth of the GOP says Powell is a racist. Powell is now dead to the GOP.

Nothing went out the window ... racism is alive and well in SC, and in the GOP.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Yeppers...
I can't tell you how many people here have automatically assumed that just because I am white I am a republican. And, racist. And, homophobic. And, a Christian... What an eye-opener. I have made comments that have been misconstrued as opposing things like affirmative action and such, only to have some of them go into a tirade about how (insert your favorite racist stereotypical accusation here) the "blacks" (and/or other minorities) are. Boy, how they love to bash the NAACP, too. That's one of their substitutes for using the n-word. And, yep, they are pissed about not being able to use the real word.

And, if anyone thinks Cain will get very far here, I have two words for you: Alan Keyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Oh yea ... in the right setting, you can say something that you think is
non-political, non-racial ... and part of what they hear is "this guys is one of us!!" ... and then the stuff they say is totally insane.

I'm torn between (1)continuing to let the crazy right wing racists self identify, so I know who they are, or (2) calling them out.

Here in NC, I tend to select #1. I tend to avoid engaging them but I can't maintain it. I had an Obama sign and magnet on my cars, and I have a tea bag guy 2 houses down. So he knows to not assume that I agree with him, and he won't come close to talking politics near me. Which is good, because if I am there, he can't bring it up with other neighbors.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. So ...does this put the lie to Tea Party is Racist against Obama?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. If they nominate Herb Cain....
that would indeed make it difficult to label Teabaggers as racist. Nutty? Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glimmer of Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
24. I am confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
27. How much did the votes cost & what was the menu?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
29. Uhh those are sentences not paragraphs.
A simple sentence, also called an independent clause, contains a subject and a verb, and it expresses a complete thought.

A compound sentence contains two independent clauses joined by a coordinator. The coordinators are as follows: for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so. (Helpful hint: The first letter of each of the coordinators spells FANBOYS.) Except for very short sentences, coordinators are always preceded by a comma.

A complex sentence has an independent clause joined by one or more dependent clauses. A complex sentence always has a subordinator such as because, since, after, although, or when or a relative pronoun such as that, who, or which.

A paragraph consists of several sentences that are grouped together. This group of sentences together discuss one main subject. In U.S. formal academic English, paragraphs have three principal parts. These three parts are the topic sentence, body sentences, and the concluding sentence. We will also talk briefly about details in paragraphs.

I for one am tired of being told my post has to be edited when it is only four paragraphs but by the New, Internet, English standard the OP is considered to be three Paragraphs....


Now I freely admit I was a High school dropout but I did get my GED in one try with out studying, but I do know the difference between a Sentence and a Paragraph. Oh yes and thank the computer gods for spell check even despite it's lack of grammar checking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
31. Bwah-HAH & do I need to explain?!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
34. KochCain will blow your brain
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
38. Straw Polls are all show and do not mean shit...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC