Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The GOP Can Kill Medicare This Year Without Even Casting a Vote. Here's How

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:44 PM
Original message
The GOP Can Kill Medicare This Year Without Even Casting a Vote. Here's How
Ok class, did you read your homework assignment? What? You didn’t know there was a homework assignment? Ok, I’ll give you five minutes to review it. Here it is:

http://www.medeanalytics.com/healthcare-news-events/pr-2011-09-medeanalytics-report-sustainable-growth-rate.html

Note this part:

"Putting off reform of the SGR even for a year would result in implementation of a very significant decrease to Medicare physician fees in calendar year 2012, which would lead to reduced physician participation in Medicare, and therefore patients' access to care.


Now, I know that the “sustainable growth rate” sounds really boring. So, how about we reframe this as “a life and death battle to save Medicare”. Is that more interesting?

You in the front row. You have a question? Why would anyone want to kill Medicare you ask?

Medicare is a thorn in the side of private health insurers. As long as Medicare exists, it would be pretty easy for the nation to expand the program to cover everyone. Instant socialized medicine. So, Medicare must die. In addition, most Medicare patients are not sick, and therefore privates would be more than happy to write them high cost policies with huge deductibles. The small percentage of Medicare recipients who actually cost the program money are poor (because of their massive health care costs) and they would be placed on Medicaid and would become the problem of state governments. In this way, the privates would suck up the Medicare premiums while dodging the financial risks.

So, how does the health care industry kill Medicare? They started under the Bush administration with the so called “Advantage” plans that sucked up Medicare dollars—and cherry picked all the healthiest Medicare members. (I've got a really old journal about this buried away somewhere if you want to go looking for it) But people figured out that the “Advantage” plans were a rip off of the federal government. And they don't eliminate the Medicare to Universalcare threat.

So, this year, the private insurers got their man Paul Ryan to write a bill, which would have eliminated Medicare for anyone under 55, forcing young and middle aged folks to keep paying high premiums for private insurance for the rest of their lives---until they got too sick to pay their out of pocket, at which point they would be enrolled in Medicaid. And remember who pays for Medicaid. That's right, class. The states. The feds pitch in, but they don't have to. How would you like to be dependent upon the kindness of Texas for your dialysis?

Anyway, back to the Paul Ryan bill. All but four House Republicans voted for it and all the House Dems voted against it. The GOP felt drunk with power….

http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/04/paul-ryan-gop-budget-saves-medicare-by-gutting-it/

And then, the pr shit hit the fan. In a panic to distance themselves from this massively unpopular bit of legislation, Republicans tabled the Paul Ryan Bill. And then, they told the Washington Post that Obama planned to gut Medicare, and the mainstream, progressive and right wing medias have been promoting this Big Lie since July, so that when 2012 rolls around and their Democratic opponents say “You tried to kill Medicare!” Tea Baggers can reply “Your president tried to kill Medicare, too!”

Yes, you in the second row? You say you read that Obama wants to “chainsaw massacre” Medicare? And you read it on the internet so that must make it true. That’s why they call it a BIG lie.

So, how can the Republicans fulfill the dream of their SuperPac donors? How can they kill Medicare without leaving a vote trail that will haunt them in the 2012 general election? Easy. They can refuse to do anything about the so called “sustainable growth rate” cuts that will slash provider reimbursement by 25% starting January, 2012.

Obama has already indicated that he wants the cuts eliminated.

Obama supports a permanent repeal of the sustainable growth rate formula that helps determine physician pay, White House Office of Management and Budget Director Jack Lew said during his Feb. 14 budget presentation.


http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2011/02/21/gvsa0221.htm

At the moment, it is a point of pride with House Republicans not to do anything that Obama wants. Say a girl is on fire on the White House lawn, and Obama wants someone to get the fire hose. Boehner and company will say “Hell no! That’s socialism. No, Obamacare!” Say the economy is hemorrhaging jobs and Obama wants them to pass a jobs bill. Their response---“Make us!” They no longer care about what the voters think. They are so confident that their mountains of SuperPac money and E vote fraud will win them the 2012 election that they will do anything to please their corporate masters….

But still, voting to end Medicare is pretty gutsy. Sort of like taking a shotgun and aiming it at your own head. That is why the House GOP will not vote---- and still end Medicare. All they have to do is say “We won’t eliminate this 25% across the board cut unless you (blank)”. At first, “blank” will be “tax cuts for the rich.” Then “blank” will be “cuts to the EPA, FDA and SEC budget.” They will keep demanding concessions, until they finally place the last straw on the camel’s/donkey's back. And when Dems have nothing more that they can give away, the House Republicans will lean back with satisfied smiles on their faces and say “It wasn’t enough. You (Obama) didn’t try hard enough to persuade us to save Medicare---so we are going to kill it. You (Obama) care more about Blacks/gays/ unions than you do about old folks. Shame on you.” And the mainstream media will blame Democrats for being unable to reach across the aisle and work out a deal with the Republicans.

A cut this massive will drive doctors ( whose overhead is about 75%) out of business. It will bankrupt hospitals. It will make it impossible for Medicare recipients to get anything other than emergency care. Instead of getting the circulation restored to his feet (expensive semi-elective vascular surgery) grandpa will have to wait until he develops gangrene of the foot, at which point a surgeon will grudgingly cut the foot off, while whining “Medicare does not pay me enough to do this.”

The hospital industry is already preparing for the worse with massive layoffs.

Financial analysts have issued gloomy predictions for hospitals, and industry advocates project that layoffs will increase if additional cuts are made to Medicare.


http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2011/09/26/bisf0929.htm

And, as December nears, and the House Republicans refuse to consider ways to save Medicare, the crisis within the medical community is only going to get worse. Since the health care industry is a huge employer in this country, significant lay offs will make unemployment rise and send the economy deeper into the toilet---which is just what the Tea Party is hoping for in advance of the 2012 elections.

Any more questions, class. Third row. You read on the internet that Obama wants to “mass murder” Medicare? Oh, I give up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. But, but, but, these are cuts to providers, not beneficiaries. They won't feel any effects.
... or so I have heard here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Keep an ear to the ground, I have picking up hints here and there
they may be trying to change their image on SS, Medicare.

Tweety had a piece on Ron Paul.(ultra Libertarian) in which
he says Ron Paul seems to be softening his stand. You know
Ron Paul was a diehard opposer of these programs. He wanted
them gone.

It seems as time has passed in this Jobless Depression,
Paul's constituents are beginning to feel the pain.
In the clip, he seemed to be indicating a change. He
commented, what else can we do. We have hungry people
in this country.

Also the Righties and their noise machine have been very
quiet on these issues--noticeably quiet. Perhaps when
home on vacation, they more clearieyed saw what was
happening in this country.

Keep you eyes and ears open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AverageJoe90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. A-FUCKING-men! n/t
If I could rec this a million times, I sure as hell would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. With the Exception that Obama Is MORE than Willing
to go along with a GOP-led destruction of Medicare so long as he doesn't have to actively do anything that leaves his fingerprint on it, I agree with this post.

The politicians in DC are ALL losers, and all on the same side in the game of SCREW THE PEOPLE, and it isn't the People's side. Even your beloved figurehead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Bingo....and reality hits the fan. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R for the early am crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phiddle Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. We should counterattack, advocating a Medicare public buy-in at cost + 25%,
Edited on Sat Oct-01-11 10:09 AM by phiddle
even as seniors remain fully subsidized. A buy-in would strengthen Medicare's finances both by the infusion of funds, and by attracting a younger and healthier patient pool. It gives the public (which HATES insurance companies) an option. By being based on the choice of the individual consumer it neutralizes the right wing talking point of government imposition. And it's a big step toward single payer, but one which gives insurance companies time to adjust.

Concerning the thread topic, it would be more difficult to repeal the sustainable growth rate formula if there were movement toward strengthening Medicare and making it more inclusive. That is, most people would prefer to strengthen Medicare if it were, or could be a live option for them.

Why 25%? The ACA mandates that insurers spend at least 20% of their revenues on health care activities, the so-called Medical Loss Ratio. A 25% markup on Medicare for the non-elderly (business employee plans included) would have the same effect; Medicare would then have an 80% MLR. As a bonus, it's probable that COMPETITION, i.e., from Medicare, would be more effective than REGULATION in reigning in the insurance companies, and less subject to political chicanery.

Counterattack!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree with this! Except for one thing
Seniors are not fully subsidized. Seniors pay a premium each month. My Mom has close to $100 deducted from her Social Security check each month to cover her Medicare premium. But if what you proposed was available today, I'd be paying into it right now! And with much lower heath care costs than my Mom has, I'd be an asset to the system rather than a liability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phiddle Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Point well taken
Edited on Sat Oct-01-11 10:25 AM by phiddle
So, charge the same premium to all enrollees. Thanks!
And, I suspect that, like you, many Americans would subscribe. Medicare would come to be known as a "service", or a "subscription", rather than that poisoned, but perfectly respectable word "entitlement".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judesedit Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. I want to know when the hell the doctors are going to speak out
They are too silent. Do they really think they are in the top one percentile???? They had better wake up and quick... or they won't only have to drop medicare they will have a huge drop in patients, period. Are doctors' that foolish??? Scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. ALL according to plan, my Pretties.
All according to plan.
<cackle>

We've all seen this movie before,
and it doesn't end well for the Working Class,
the Retired,
and The Poor.



Cherish your memories, SUCKERS!
because we're TAKING everything else!
Hahahahahahaha!




You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.

Solidarity!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a2liberal Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
14. And who exactly signed this "SGR" formula into law?
And failed to use the line-item veto on it while it was briefly available? (Not that it would have lasted, but it would have been a powerful statement...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yoyossarian Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. Scary stuff!
Kick!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. K&R. I hope they save the SGR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC