Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds threaten to sue states over union laws

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 03:32 PM
Original message
Feds threaten to sue states over union laws
Edited on Fri Jan-14-11 04:31 PM by The Northerner
WASHINGTON – The National Labor Relations Board on Friday threatened to sue Arizona, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah over constitutional amendments guaranteeing workers the right to a secret ballot in union elections.

The agency's acting general counsel, Lafe Solomon, said the amendments conflict with federal law, which gives employers the option of recognizing a union if a majority of workers sign cards that support unionizing.

The amendments, approved on Nov. 2, have taken effect in South Dakota and Utah, and will do so soon in Arizona and South Carolina.

Business and anti-union groups sought the amendments, arguing that such secrecy is necessary to protect workers against union intimidation. They are concerned that Congress might enact legislation requiring employers to allow the "card check" process for forming unions instead of secret ballot elections.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110114/ap_on_re_us/us_unions_secret_ballots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. (R) - corporate vs. (R) - states rights nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thats great news. Federal labor laws alway supersede state law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent news. k/r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not as educated about unions as I should be but I thought the secret ballot
was a good thing, so people who wanted to JOIN the union could have their say secretly without fearing the loss of their jobs if the union didn't get formed.

Am I wrong in that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The SECRET BALLOT requires an election. Card check does not
the election facilitates meetings and 'information sharing' about the harms of unions and the company would really prefer that you not start their shit here.
get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamtechus Donating Member (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Not in this case
Setting up and holding a secret ballot election takes a month or more. That gives the employers lots of time to harrass, threaten and intimidate workers. Time and again, more than 50% of workers sign petitions to have union representation only to have the workers scared into voting against it during that wait before the election.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thank you for explaining that. Makes sense. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC