Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Please stop calling it the "Mainstream Media"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
theaocp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:30 AM
Original message
Please stop calling it the "Mainstream Media"
MarKOS had a great idea a few years back: call it the "Traditional Media." It's respectful, yet allows for an inference that they are losing their relevance in the world of bloggers and the Internet (Gooooo TYT!). Calling them "mainstream" allows them to maintain their grip on the narrative when they want nothing more than to serve their corporate masters. They are a shrinking portion of media and should be discussed as such. Thanks for reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's really the corporate media.
Tradition died when the news divisions became profit centers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. That would be a much better label. It's certainly more truthful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. That is the one I like and use a big part of the time. They are corporate, like MSNBC & CNBC owned
by General Electric. So, I will continue using corporate but can see traditional as well and which is better than MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Corporate Media is a better term; Corporate Public Relations, may be more accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prairierose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. I;ve called it corporate media for years and ....
I do nt see any reason to stop. It seems the most accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. good point. corporatewhoremedia is one label that seems apropos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. I Like McPravda -NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why not lamestream - i mean I've heard that somewhere.
Seem catchy.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. LOL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theaocp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. It's catchy, but
still reminds people of the term, "mainstream." Thus, people still attribute the gospel according to tv and print as infallible. I'm happy with "corporate media." Thanks for all the input. Let's change the tone and message!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentauros Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. "Catchy" is the most important factor here.
Think like a marketing professional and y'all will come up with something that's easy to remember, rolls off the tongue and still creates the image you want the masses to visualize. Neither "Traditional Media" nor "Corporate Media" fit the criteria.

The fewer syllables, the better :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm with City Lights on Corporate Media. "Traditional Media" is a problem term for me
I think it is outdated because:

- it seems to assume that the blogosphere was going to "save us" somehow. And yet how many far right blogs are out their peddling lies etc? There is more disinformation on the net than there is in much of the say, the CBS evening news.

- "Traditional" implies print and television. Yet corporate media clearly has a huge internet presence.

The term "Corporate Media" also helps us understand why that kind of media is the way that it is. To the owners, news is the filler between commercials. The more popular your news show is, the more you can charge for ads. So the news is packaged for popularity and ratings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. We really need to say CORPORATE MEDIA. Not all corporations
are enemies of the American people, but many are. And some of our most powerful enemies are corporations. We need to realize that we are no longer being told the truth by the vast majority of the media. CORPORATE media should be the term, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. I've had experience with people calling their stuff 'traditional'.
It doesn't turn out any better than their calling it "mainstream."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC