Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP Exclusive: Officials slam corn syrup rebranding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 10:07 AM
Original message
AP Exclusive: Officials slam corn syrup rebranding
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/AP-Exclusive-Officials-slam-apf-2529890392.html?x=0

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- The Food and Drug Administration has cautioned the corn industry over its ongoing use of the term "corn sugar" to describe high fructose corn syrup, asking them to stop using the proposed new name before it has received regulatory approval, The Associated Press has learned.

The Corn Refiners Association wants to use "corn sugar" as an alternative name for the widely used liquid sweetener currently labeled as high fructose corn syrup on most sodas and packaged foods. They're attempting an image makeover after some scientists linked the product to obesity, diabetes and other health problems; some food companies now tout products that don't contain the ingredient.

Though it could take another year before the FDA rules on the request made last September to change the name, the Corn Refiners Association has for months been using "corn sugar" on television commercials and at least two websites: cornsugar.com and sweetsurprise.com.

A series of high-profile television, online and print advertisements tell consumers that "sugar is sugar" and that corn sugar is natural and safe, provided it's consumed in moderation.

More at the link --

about freaking time FDA....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Compromise: let the industry have its new label as long as there are mandatory
and explicit warning labels on the products with HFCS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wounded Bear Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Imagine that. A regulatory agency doing its job....
Have been avoiding HFCS for years. Feel better for it. Still read labels looking for it and mostly avoid anything with that as an ingredient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Fructose is a sugar
Most HFCS is 55% fructose and 45% glucose.

Cane sugar is sucrose, which your intestines break into 50% fructose and 50% glucose before it is absorbed into your blood stream.

Avoid sugars, since the fructose has to be metabolized in the liver.

Starches and other complex carbohydrates are mostly polymers of glucose, which your body easily breaks down to individual glucose molecules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Highly Fucked-up Corn Syrup
"Sugar is sugar". No, it isn't. In medical or nutritional terms that is simply a lie. It's far outside the range of medically acceptable opinion because it simply denies the differences between different sugars - differences in rate of absorption, digestibillity, sweetness, impurities, reaction of the insulin system, ecological and economic impacts of producing it, taste - really the ONLY thing they have in common is belonging to a particular class of chemical structures.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. The higher fructose corn syrups ought to be banned.
HFCS 42 isn't quite so hideous, it behaves much like sucrose. But HFCS 55 and above clearly has an addictive quality to it. That's why they put it in soft drinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. We all need to eat as little
Processed Foods as possible. That would greatly reduce our problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC