Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Et tu Britain? Et tu?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-11 08:06 PM
Original message
Et tu Britain? Et tu?

Ministers back anti-abortion lobby reforms
Charities warn of 'distress and delay' as they are stripped of principal responsibility to counsel women seeking a termination

Polly Curtis
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 28 August 2011


The government has caved in to calls from anti-abortionists to overhaul existing protocols and strip charities and medics of their exclusive responsibility for counselling women seeking to terminate a pregnancy.

The Department of Health confirmed that it would change the rules to ensure that women are also offered counselling "independently" of existing abortion services. Its announcement was made in advance of an attempt next week led by the Tory backbencher Nadine Dorries to amend the health and social care bill to force such a requirement. Dorries says that the charity-run abortion services – including the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) and Marie Stopes – have a financial conflict of interest in advising women seeking terminations. She says that by offering independent counselling, 60,000 of the 200,000 abortions each year could be prevented.

The charities say that another layer of counselling could cause distress by delaying access to abortions. They also say that the counselling they offer is continuous throughout the process of seeking a termination and that there is no evidence they are biased in the care they provide.

Yvette Cooper, the shadow home secretary, said the government's decision was based on prejudice rather than evidence. ...............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/28/anti-abortion-lobby-reforms



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-11 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. *sigh*
The craziness is spreading across the pond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-11 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Abortion clinics already help women by counseling for choices
Not only that but they provide pregnancy check-ups and pre-natal care. These stupid assholes think it must be some deep dark dungeon with fetus blood dripping from the rock walls and the Devil's minions dancing with glee in the corners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left on green only Donating Member (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-11 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh boy! Another 60,000 to 200,000 hungry mouths to feed on our tiny planet
each year. It would appear that Nadine truly is a sadist. Why else would she so anxious to pollute the only planet we have to the point past sustainability? I always thought that backbenchers had higher IQ's than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-11 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Damn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-11 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. sorry to say this
But a lot of this is for the same reason it is here, because they older white population is scared that a bunch of brown people may become the new majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't usually refer to other women this way -
but Nadine Dorries is a lying bitch.

"Dorries, a former nurse who says she is campaigning on the issue after witnessing botched terminations, says she does not oppose abortion. However, she has previously campaigned to reduce the abortion time limit and said that her explicit aim was to reduce the number of terminations, claiming that 60,000 could be prevented each year if women were given independent advice."

"The abortion process is so fast – seven to 14 days. Women who do have doubts or niggles are on the other side before they have a chance to think it through. The majority may feel it's fine but there are a growing number thinking it wasn't what I wanted to do. As it gets faster and faster more women are falling off the edge. This is a women's rights issue."


She wants to make it as long, drawn-out, and painful a process as she possibly can.

Women's rights issue, my arse.

Lying bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC