|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 12:24 AM Original message |
WRT the East Coast EARTHQUAKE and aftershocks--is anyone using the "F" word yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohheckyeah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. I certainly used a different F word. :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 01:01 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Well, yeah, that too--and who could blame you? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
2. Someone (at least one) on DU has mentioned it of course, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Firebrand Gary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 12:31 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I admit it, it was me. I posted that earlier. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 01:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I don't have any expertise in the process, but it sounds pretty invasive to me, from what I have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
4. i thought it was global warming. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
5. I used it at the office around 14:00 PDT today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarLeftFist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
8. Feeling aftershocks right now in NYC. Very slight but noticeable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
9. I don't know about my fellow NY DUers, but I support fracking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 01:15 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. You aren't concerned about the contamination potential to groundwater? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 01:26 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. We're going to regulate the hell out of the operations. Also, see this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 08:57 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. I would be worried, but that's me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
10. The "F" Word I Was Thinking of was "Fukushima" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 01:12 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Salient point. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 01:17 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. They still have roads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 01:13 AM Response to Original message |
12. As I said in the other thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denbot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
15. Fracking.. a small amount of hydraulic pressure causing a large earthquake.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 09:00 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. A small amount here, there, and everywhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 01:39 AM Response to Original message |
17. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 09:01 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Woah....ain't THAT special!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 05:21 AM Response to Original message |
18. An interesting theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 12:16 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. I suppose, if you ignore all the other earthquakes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fred Engels (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
22. Very, very doubtful. Wells have been hydraulic and sand fractured for 60 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 10:51 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. That's not the case in PA and elsewhere--they are fracturing 'dense' rock a mile below the earth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 02:20 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Deleted message |
Brickbat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
24. Sometimes an earthquake is just an earthquake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-25-11 11:02 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. I am not claiming to have authoritative information, here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ensho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
25. time will tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-25-11 11:04 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. That's entirely true. I was just wondering if anyone here had read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-24-11 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
27. it has been mentioned on TV but no formal investigation yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-25-11 11:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. You might be right. I hope that there will be some sort of authoritative research done, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC