Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Open Season

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:07 PM
Original message
Open Season
At the beginning of Terry Gilliam's film The Fisher King, a radio "shock jock" named Jack (and more or less modeled on then-celebrity Howard Stern) takes a call from a guy who complains that a woman he's fascinated by is ignoring him. After leading the caller on to ever crazier expressions of his obsession and his anger toward this woman, Jack gives him some "advice" about how to deal with the woman who is causing him all this pain. Obviously enjoying the sound of his own voice, and tickled at the thought of how edgy and "politically incorrect" he's being, Jack winds up his response by telling the caller to just "blow her away." A few scenes later, Jack is startled to hear on the news that in fact, the caller took his advice and went on a homicidal shooting spree in a local bar. When we next see him, Jack has lost his job and his apartment; he's sponging off his girlfriend, who works at a video rental store, and is pretty much ready to hit bottom. Back in 1991, when this film was made, Gilliam assumed that viewers would hold Jack responsible for the deaths committed by the lunatic whose delusions he fed for the sake of his ratings. Jack's guilt is taken for granted; the real question driving the film is whether or how Jack will find redemption.

How times change.

The film, of course, being a work of fiction, makes the connection clear by putting the media celebrity who spouts the violent rhetoric in direct contact with the lunatic who then goes and takes out a half-dozen people. In real life it is not often that clear-cut. No doubt Jared Lee Loughner never spoke to Sarah Palin. But she spoke to him--and so did Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter and Pat Buchanan and all the other purveyors of violent right-wing rhetoric who have filled the public sphere with this poison. And if she is not responsible for the fact of Loughner's insanity, she and her ilk do bear some responsibility for the content of his delusions.

This is something that the GBLT community learned a long time ago: When you are designated by legitimate--or at least legitimized--politicians, religious leaders, and media celebrities as an acceptable target for hateful and violent rhetoric, that makes you a target for hateful and violent action. When you are repeatedly held up by supposedly rational indviduals as the root cause of every evil thing that afflicts this country, then people start to believe that they have a right--nay, even a duty--to kill you.

Sure, many of these people are mentally ill. It is in fact forseeable that a fair number of people who are legitimately mentally ill will in fact be drawn to this kind of "political" discourse--because it is itself fundamentally irrational. Whether it's directed at gay people specifically or at "liberals" in general, the kind of rhetoric that Palin, Beck et al. are now frantically erasing from their websites now is based not on logic but on fear and anger; and it often expresses itself in the form of insane conspiracy theories or the obsessive scapegoating of a particular group of people.

Of course one cannot be held responsible for the delusions of those people who choose to follow one. Unless, that is, one is cynically feeding those delusions because they happen to serve one's own political purposes.

I would not go so far as to say that the death of six people and the wounding of 14 was the *desired* result of Sarah Palin's little foray into the rhetoric of the bullet. But it is absolutely forseeable. The same way it is forseeable that right-wing frothery about "activist judges" has made them the targets of this kind of violence--again, often perpetrated by the mentally ill, but condoned and legitimized by our elected representatives. The same way that it was forseeable that the kind of anti-gay bigotry spewed by right-wing commentators throughout the Clinton years might create a climate in which beating up Matthew Shepard and leaving him for dead would seem to two guys in Wyoming like the right thing to do on a cold night in 1998.

These right wing mouthpieces will themselves never admit the connection, but that doesn't mean a thing. They're the party of the supernaturally autonomous individual. They never acknowledge the validity of this kind of indirect connection--unless, that is, they are engaged in constructing webs of craziness that link all evil everywhere to the passage of Obama's health care bill.

Someone forwarded me a piece months ago about the political threat Sarah Palin represented to the American public. I read it, and I said, this guy is wrong. Palin is still viable as a celebrity, but if you look at the results of the midterm elections, the candidates she actually promoted by and large didn't do too well. I think America has decided that they find her entertaining but that they don't want her governing, or determining who governs. Which, I said at the time, is fine with me.

Except that if she and her confederates are successful in creating a climate in which people are afraid to run for office against right-wing candidates because they are afraid of being shot, then she doesn't have to care what the American people think of her ability to govern. The bullet may do for her what the ballot didn't. We saw it happen with the shootings at abortion clinics. Roe v. Wade is safe--for now--but the number of doctors willing to put themselves at risk in order to perform abortions has gone down. It doesn't matter too much that you have a legal right to something if the people with guns have made it impossible for you to exercise it.

This has to stop. This shooting is one step on a path that leads to a very bad place. I don't know how we do that, exactly. My instinct is to say that the best approach is to render this kind of violence unprofitable to the political figures whose voices promote it. Media boycotts against particularly egregious commentators have had mixed results; but perhaps with this incident as a motivator something could finally be done to separate Palin et al. from their sponsors. All I know is that we need to make it impossible for one group of people in this country to declare it open season on another.

:scared:

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hi Plaid. Let me be the first to K&R
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 05:15 PM by LiberalEsto
:kick:

Once again, what you've written is the breath of sanity amid the rightwing maelstrom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well written, well thought out
good job. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. nice to see you again
the normalization of violence as a political response to not getting your way is bad for American society. that's it, plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Outstanding.
And it's nice to see you.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ineeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Beautifully said. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Restore the Fairness Doctrine and revoke Clinton's Telecommunications Act
The media will never change. They removed high ratings liberal shows and replaced them with known losers. Ideology is more profitable than revenue stream. Just like every dollar spent by lobbyists yields many many more dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Plaidder! I was just thinking about you this morning!
:hi: and nicely done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. once again it`s nice to see you back but..
under these circumstances it`s bittersweet.

yes....it`s up to us to make it impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. I have loved that movie forever and unfortunately, wondered ...
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 05:47 PM by Myrina
... when something like that was going to happen in the real world. :(


One small correction: Jack tells Edwin "Something's got to be done - it's us or them (referring to the 'yuppies' at the trendy cafe)" ... he doesn't tell him to 'blow her away'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Thanks for the correction.
Sorry I quoted it wrong. I loved the film but have only been able to watch it once. The scene in which the death of Parry's wife is reenacted was just too viscerally horrifying.

With that dialogue, Jack's interaction with the caller is even closer to the M.O. of Palin & Beck--hint and insinuate but don't actually say anything you could be arrested for.

It all makes me very sad.

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. And the first pollie who publically backs down will embolden them tenfold.
And I'm afraid it will happen. There will be an incident that comes too close to a candidate's child/family and they will cite the threat as a reason. Cue, further and greater threats and possibly examples as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well said as only you are able to.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hope you stay
Your essays have been missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. What she said
We've missed you Plaid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catrose Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. Been thinking about that movie
Thanks for setting down the words.

Coincidentally, there's an article on this site about a REPUBLICAN pol stepping down because he's afraid of the Tea Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. As I stated in another post, the RW talk show hosts want it both ways.
They want you to believe that they can move the masses and shape the political climate in this country. But, when you point out that their constant message of hate and violence may push some of their listeners over the edge to where they take violent action against a person from that targeted group, they go bonkers in denial, try to turn the tables and say it's the other side's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Batgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
19. Very thoughtful summation -- K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
20. The Far Right sees assassination as ends justifying the means.
Think of where this country might be if JFK, MLK, RFK, Wellstone, et al, were allowed to live vs where we are today.

Assassination, violence, intimidation, suppression are all tools the Far Right is willing to use.

I'm really starting to feel that November 22, 1963 was the beginning of the 2nd U.S. Civil War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
21. Unfortunately, can only rec once
Well put. Sadly, those on the right aren't interested in rational, intelligent discourse like this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
22. This should be published.
k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. Thank you. You have been sorely missed around here,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. K and R
I just hope the prez finds some spine and spits out some Truth at the Memorial. In this situation, there is NO ROOM FOR COMPROMISE. Period.

I'm old so I know how our the violence and hatred of our culture has increased...and I do blame the Limpballs, Savages, Palins, etc. They have created this atmosphere of hatred and violence.

MSM needs to keep replaying Giffords video that discusses Palin's 'Hit Map' and how it has consequences.

The prez needs to say that the FCC needs to investigate use of the airwaves for spurring on violence and hatred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
27. Very nice to see you again! :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidthegnome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
28. Good post
I don't think Palin and co. can be separated from their sponsors, mainly because some of them are incredibly wealthy and have nothing resembling a conscience. Having said that - I think this will greatly disturb some members of the tea party and of the republican party. Palin and her ilk may not tone down their rhetoric, but others will perhaps take a step back and reconsider their affiliations - or so I hope. Time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. Welcome back!
This needs to be pinned at the top of every forum on DU.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
30. it is always good to see you here


and to read your (always) well-written commentary.

K + R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
31. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
32. Consider Nazi Germany.
By vilifying a group of people (the Jews), and blaming all their society's ills on them, the Nazi regime was able to convince not just a few lunatices by essentially an ENTIRE country, educated in Western Civilization, with European culture and background, of the need to round up and incarcerate people like cattle and slaughter them. As Plaid says, "When you are repeatedly held up by supposedly rational indviduals as the root cause of every evil thing that afflicts this country, then people start to believe that they have a right--nay, even a duty--to kill you."

The rhetoric that has infiltrated and poisoned our political discourse can rapidly advance to this danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
33. thank you for the post,
I appreciate your insight and that you've made a return to voice it. Again, Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
34. Too late to rec, so here's a kick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC