Maybe that Dem logo should be changed again?

[Duer 157099]

I mean, yes, it emulates a bullseye and not, thankfully, a gun sight, but still, is that really the message we should be sending?

[blondeatlast]

1. Oy. nt

[bushisanidiot]

2. It doesn't look like bullseye at all.

it's a circle. circles aren't bad.

[Duer 157099]

8. Seriously? It doesn't look like a target?

Logo designs are ALWAYS deliberate because of the imagery they invoke. Always.

I just wonder what message they were really trying to send? :shrug:

[bushisanidiot]

17. Sorry, but it looks like a superhero emblem to me.

AND I LIKE IT. ;)

[Ken Burch]

12. But that would mean we'd have to change the party song from "Happy Days Are Here Again"

to

"The World Is A Circle,
Without a beginning,
And nobody knows
where it really ends".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC1C1L5jOHE

[derby378]

3. Bring back the donkey, for Thor's sake

Natalie Foster and Tim Kaine should be kicking themselves over this epic fail of a logo idea.

[walldude]

4. The only message that logo sends

is that the Democratic party is so devoid of creativity that the best they could do for a logo was to steal it from The Fantastic 4.

That thing was pathetic when they first proposed it and it's pathetic now.

[Little Star]

5. Bingo!

[The Wielding Truth]

10. Yep.

[uppityperson]

16. +1. Bring back the donkey

[RKP5637]

18. +1, And all it needs is a diagonal on it and it's a stop democrats logo. I've

never liked the thing and don't get why it was ever changed.

[Ken Burch]

6. Hell yeah...it was bad enough when it just looked like a LETTER GRADE!

We don't need to make it any easier for them to aim at us.

[jpak]

7. Maybe Obama should delete the O's from his name too

stupid nonsense

yup

[Ken Burch]

21. He only has ONE "O" in the name.

Face it, the logo is a complete failure. Nothing associated with a 64-seat loss in the House should ever be kept.

[somone]

9. Boring, stupid, wimpy logo

[derby378]

11. Wimpy, wimpy, wimpy!

Donkeys can at least kick things.

[gatorboy]

13. HAHAHAHA!

Oh wait, you were serious... *shuffles feet*

[NYC Liberal]

14. The problem was NEVER with bulls eyes or crosshairs in and of themselves

The problem is/was putting them on a map over specific districts AND then using language like "let's reload" and talking about "second amendment solutions."

The symbols in and of themselves are not bad.

[Lasher]

15. I felt that way when I first saw it.

This logo offers significant opportunity for improvement.

[Gemini Cat]

19. It looks like a circle with the letter 'D' in it.

Calm down.

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

20. From dull to dreary?