Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It is critical that Democrats and other Progressives get the PEOPLE a >70% democratic congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:43 PM
Original message
It is critical that Democrats and other Progressives get the PEOPLE a >70% democratic congress
Edited on Tue Aug-16-11 01:00 PM by uponit7771
FDR had an 83% dem congress at one time during his presidency and an average of around 70% dem congress throughout his 11yrs in the White House.

Progressives and democrats want Obama to deliver FDR type results....well, give him FDR type congress, seeing how the nations laws work Obama would have no choice but to move to the left were progressive and most democrats want him to be.

Your take?

Regards

Edit, we should get the people a >70% dem congress then Obama can't run from that no?

Your take
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have become somewhat unamused at our lack of involvement. Let Obama do Ething.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeap, we he said "we are the answers we've been looking" for people thought he meant every one
...on the stage with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. We vote, write, fax, phone, sometimes rally & send $. That's not "involvement"?
What is then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. No, getting 3 other people to do the same with you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Our peer pressure must unseat the Reagan paradigm. That must be loud and hostile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. My take is if the president consistently goes behind the back of the Dems we DO elect to cut deals..
...with Repukes, and then strongarm the Democrats in the House and Senate to adhere to those "deals", we're going to have the exact same ride as we have so far. Which is to say, a disappointing one.

Reid: 'I'm the Senate majority leader. Why don't I know about this deal?'

Rep. Conyers: Obama Demanded Social Security Cuts--Not GOP

Do you see how that works? This was the same way in Dec. 2010. This is not effective leadership with the party and it's why the President always seems to be in a pugilistic stance with progressive Democrats.

Or let's take another argument- picking Supreme Court justices. That's great, right? Well, Clarence Thomas could have easily been driven from the bench but the Administration chose not to pursue holding him accountable for his crimes.

The President isn't the end-all, be-all face of our Democratic government but, come on, the dude has spent way more time threatening and strong-arming Democrats in the party than he has the Repukes. This is a serious leadership crisis and it's not like it's going to go away unless he decides to address it. Like, seriously address it.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I guess the op is saying we have to force Obama against his will
to enact progressive policy. Overwhelm him with progressives. Or else we get more backroom deals with industry and/or Republicans who must answer to the Tea Party. That may well be the only way because Obama will not do it of his own volition. Good point about Clarence. Can you imagine what the Bushies would have done to a corrupt liberal on the Court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Nope, we must give him political cover. His political capital is 38ish.
We must keep his bargaining position strong. All he has is the bully pulpit and a veto. Republican two santa policy, has robbed him of any tools, as it was meant to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is that even possible in this day of partisan politics?
Edited on Tue Aug-16-11 01:00 PM by bigwillq
I think in 2007, when DEMS took over, DEMS controlled only around 53 percent of Congress. It seems awfully tough to be able to control 70 percent or more.
I'll be voting for progressives every chance I get, but that number might not be attainable, for either party.


Edit: In 2009, I think it was around 58 percent DEM, if my math is correct. Not good with math, and I added the figures quick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. If he want's the votes of the left he should appeal to them, rather than pandering to the right.
Convincing the voters to vote for you is the job of the candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Congress and President are two different branches of government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Are you suggesting that Obama can work alone?
But, allowing for that, then the candidates for congress should appeal to the left, even if it means opposing Obama, if they want our votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. WOW!!! THIS GETS REC"D TO ZERO!!!! Seriously?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Seriously! I UnRec any thread where the OP complains about UnRecs.
If you posted the best thread on DU today would it be any less great if you got no Recs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. No, it's critical that the Dems get the people a >70% Dem congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. True, I'll change OP...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Did Bush ever have that? He got EVERYTHING HE WANTED!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. false
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rochester Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. Great idea, but how?
There's too many ignorant and hateful and malicious voters out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. that would have been real easy if obama hadn't decided to resucitate the dying republican party..
obama's legitimizing the party and embracing their talking points has made that impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. K, even if it's hard it needs to be done no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. Bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. can't believe we're having this conversation. he makes me angry.

he's a frikin republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. ?

Two great choices for Supreme Court.

The Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

The Matthew Shepard Hates Crimes Prevention Act (which they said could not be done)

Children's Health Insurance

Tobacco Regulation

Credit Card Reform

Student Loan Reform

The Stimulus (including the largest tax cut ever, the largest investment in clean energy ever, the single largest investment in education in our country ever)

Health Reform

Wall Street Reform

The New G.I. Bill

The Food Safety Modernization Act (the most expansive food reform bill since the 1930s)

The Don't Ask Don't Tell Repeal

The New Start Treaty (even when the (R)s said he would never be able to get it passed)

Locking up over half the loose nuclear material in the world in less than half of his first term, something most (R)s thought impossible.




Most of that list is from The Rachel Maddow Show and is included in this clip
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#4077 ...

In that clip she also estimates that ~85% of what President Obama said he wanted to accomplish in his first term had been accomplished in the first half of his first term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a simple pattern Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. It would be wasted on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. We gave Obama a democratic congress and senate, and he still acted
like republican. Face it, the man is not a real democrat! He's more in line with Joe Lieberman and Evan Bayh. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC