Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bumper Sticker: Social Security--Shut Up and FUND It!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
BlueDemKev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 09:18 AM
Original message
Bumper Sticker: Social Security--Shut Up and FUND It!
When conservatives say, "but there's no money..." tell them that Social Security for retirees is more important than tax breaks for millionaires and for corporations that ship U.S. jobs overseas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. You could make your retirement fund with this
I have never bought a bumper sticker, but I would shell out for this one.

Seriously, why not do it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamtechus Donating Member (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. It IS funded!
Top 5 Social Security Myths

Myth #1: Social Security is going broke.

Reality: There is no Social Security crisis. By 2023, Social Security will have a $4.6 trillion surplus (yes, trillion with a ‘T’). It can pay out all scheduled benefits for the next quarter-century with no changes whatsoever.1 After 2037, it’ll still be able to pay out 75% of scheduled benefits—and again, that’s without any changes. The program started preparing for the Baby Boomers’ retirement decades ago.2 Anyone who insists Social Security is broke probably wants to break it themselves.

Myth #2: We have to raise the retirement age because people are living longer.

Reality: This is a red-herring to trick you into agreeing to benefit cuts. Retirees are living about the same amount of time as they were in the 1930s. The reason average life expectancy is higher is mostly because many fewer people die as children than they did 70 years ago.3 What’s more, what gains there have been are distributed very unevenly—since 1972, life expectancy increased by 6.5 years for workers in the top half of the income brackets, but by less than 2 years for those in the bottom half.4 But those intent on cutting Social Security love this argument because raising the retirement age is the same as an across-the-board benefit cut.

Myth #3: Benefit cuts are the only way to fix Social Security.

Reality: Social Security doesn’t need to be fixed. But if we want to strengthen it, here’s a better way: Make the rich pay their fair share. If the very rich paid taxes on all of their income, Social Security would be sustainable for decades to come.5 Right now, high earners only pay Social Security taxes on the first $106,000 of their income.6 But conservatives insist benefit cuts are the only way because they want to protect the super-rich from paying their fair share.

Myth #4: The Social Security Trust Fund has been raided and is full of IOUs

Reality: Not even close to true. The Social Security Trust Fund isn’t full of IOUs, it’s full of U.S. Treasury Bonds. And those bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.7 The reason Social Security holds only treasury bonds is the same reason many Americans do: The federal government has never missed a single interest payment on its debts. President Bush wanted to put Social Security funds in the stock market—which would have been disastrous—but luckily, he failed. So the trillions of dollars in the Social Security Trust Fund, which are separate from the regular budget, are as safe as can be.

Myth #5: Social Security adds to the deficit

Reality: It’s not just wrong—it’s impossible! By law, Social Security’s funds are separate from the budget, and it must pay its own way. That means that Social Security can’t add one penny to the deficit.8

Defeating these myths is the first step to stopping Social Security cuts. Can you share this list now?

Sources:

1.”To Deficit Hawks: We the People Know Best on Social Security,” New Deal 2.0, June 14, 2010 http://www.moveon.org/r?r=89703&id=22141-17700787-cAEhIbx&t=4

2. “The Straight Facts on Social Security,” Economic Opportunity Institute, September 2009 http://www.moveon.org/r?r=89704&id=22141-17700787-cAEhIbx&t=5

3. “Social Security and the Age of Retirement,” Center for Economic and Policy Research, June 2010 http://www.moveon.org/r?r=89705&id=22141-17700787-cAEhIbx&t=6

4. “More on raising the retirement age,” Washington Post, July 8, 2010 http://www.moveon.org/r?r=89706&id=22141-17700787-cAEhIbx&t=7

5. “Social Security is sustainable,” Economic and Policy Institute, May 27, 2010 http://www.moveon.org/r?r=89707&id=22141-17700787-cAEhIbx&t=8

6. “Maximum wage contribution and the amount for a credit in 2010,” Social Security Administration, April 23, 2010 http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/240

7. “Trust Fund FAQs,” Social Security Administration, February 18, 2010 http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/ProgData/fundFAQ.html

8.”To Deficit Hawks: We the People Know Best on Social Security,” New Deal 2.0, June 14, 2010 http://www.moveon.org/r?r=89703&id=22141-17700787-cAEhIbx&t=9

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's already funded, just don't steal the funds.
But it would be nice to raise or eliminate the FICA tax cap so that it would be fully funded A QUARTER OF A CENTURY FROM NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC