Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama: Public Sector Unions "an area where there’s got to be burden sharing as well"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:40 AM
Original message
Obama: Public Sector Unions "an area where there’s got to be burden sharing as well"
http://www.fox47.com/newsroom/top_stories/videos/vid_1961.shtml

I do say, though, to my friends in the public sector unions that it is important that you are on the side of reform where reform is needed. Because the truth of the matter is, is that at a time when everybody is belt-tightening, there is nothing wrong with a union saying to itself, you know what, we know budgets are hard right now. Let’s sit down and say we’re willing to negotiate so that we’re making some sacrifices to maintain the number of teachers in the classroom and keep class sizes at a reasonable level. We’re willing to make some modifications in terms of how our pension systems work so that they’re sustainable for the next generation of teachers as long as it’s a conversation, as opposed to it simply being imposed and collective bargaining rights being stripped away.



So I think it’s important -- remember we talked about shared sacrifice and burden sharing. Well, this is an area where there’s got to be burden sharing as well. If a public sector employee is able to retire at 55 with 80 percent of their wages, and the average public sector employee has got a 401(k) that they’ve just seen decline by about 20 percent and they have no idea how they’re going to retire, and they’re feeling burdened by a lot of taxes and they don’t feel like the public sector employers are making any adjustments whatsoever to reflect the tough economic realities that are facing folks who are not protected, then there’s going to be a natural backlash.

Full transcript and video at the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe I'm missing it....
But is the "shared burden" the poor and middle class equally fighting for sixty-cent canned dog food at Walmart?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Cat food.
Obama is making the poor and middle class eat cat food.

Then he's going to run you over with a bus.


:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. But I get peas right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCheese Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. My goodness.
I think someone kidnapped the real Barack Obama and replaced him with a Heritage Foundation pod person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indurancevile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. when do the banksters get to share in the sacrifice? or did you mean we're
Edited on Tue Aug-16-11 05:23 AM by indurancevile
being sacrificed to them?









“Capital is dead labor, which, vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labor, and lives the more, the more labor it sucks.” Karl Marx

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. We should cut a deal. The Unions won't give up jack shit until Wall Street bankers/hedge funders do.
Maybe when they actually start paying taxes up there at the 1%, then union workers may start loosening up their position on no concessions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. When were the wealthy asked to share the burden?
I don't recall that request being made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Watch the entire town hall, he does so multiple times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Really? You don't hear that? Because I hear the president say
it every time he speaks. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. Well, he just lost my husband's vote. Obama is NOT a friend of public sector unions.
I can't even type right now I am so angry. Obama is a big fucking disappointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owlet Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe he's been reading this guy
Mike Shedlock / Mish is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction.



"A New York Times article accurately describes a set of fiscal realities in Sunday's editorial A Growing Gloom for States and Cities. The New York Times wildly misses the mark as to who is to blame for this crisis.

NYT: Washington should have been trying to find a way to help states avoid the layoffs and cutbacks that have contributed heavily to the high unemployment rate. Instead, it seems to be doing everything possible to make the situation worse in state capitals around the country.

Mish: That is essentially correct (except the implied tone). I proposed three items that would most assuredly help cities and states. Once again, here they are.

1. Scrap Davis-Bacon and all prevailing wages laws that force up costs of construction and other projects at the city, county, state and federal level.

2.. End Collective Bargaining of public unions. Governor Scott Walker in Wisconsin shows the dramatic results that can happen if this is done. School districts that had budget deficits hugely in the read, saw them immediately go into the green, and not even for reasons that one might think. I wrote about it in Union-Busting is a "Godsend"; Elimination of Collective Bargaining is the Single Best Thing one Can do for School Kids

3. Pass national right-to-work laws. Again this will help cash-strapped cities, counties, and states that have to deal with union-mandated pricing instead of competitive pricing. The goal of government should be to provide the most benefit for the least cost. The goal of unions is to provide as little work as possible for the most cost. It's time we end that model."

Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. Ok so we give up homes, pension values, health care negotiated in good faith in exchange for wages,
loan assistance for advanced degrees, Medicaid striped down, reductions in Social Security and Medicaid, lots of wages, jobs, take a bath in our retirement funds or have to burn them to survive, the greatest return on investment that we have-our space program, and take a hatchet to all manner of discretionary spending that helps virtually everyone and he will ask the wealthy to fork over a few pennies from their monstrous hoards by returning to the previous too low a rate and will call that shared sacrifice?

Sounds like a devil's bargain to me where the many are demanded to cut not just a little fat but flesh and even bone while the few with the lion's share are not being asked to sacrifice shit in any meaningful definition of the word, certainly not in context, and give up a tiny sliver of their excess that will not impact their lifestyle an iota.

It really is immoral to even talk this bullshit game. This man doesn't represent us and he ought to be fucking ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. WHAT!! "If a public sector employee is able to retire at 55 with 80 percent of their wages"
He should provide examples of that.

He is worried about how non-union people will view the rights that unions fought for?

He is that concerned about appearance??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I want examples of those who retire at 55 with 80% of wages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. No kidding
I want leap on that gravy train and lick the bowl. That would be great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. Unions *always* do this.
There isn't any reform needed. He's just repeating RW smears of unions. When are we going to start calling on the wealthy for reform and sacrifice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theaocp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
16. No.
Until the banksters and corporations are putting in their fair share (and I mean FIRST), I don't want to hear anybody lecturing me and my public union. Obama is out of his league and seems to delight in pissing off working people. It reminds me of the Michael Palin being turned right-side up by the Romans in Life of Brian. "What I wouldn't give to be spat at in the face!" Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
18. Fuck that!
Edited on Tue Aug-16-11 08:24 AM by Dappleganger
There's no doubt left as to where the president is regarding upholding longstanding democratic principles--he stands on the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
19. Obama should acknowledge that unions ARE making concessions all over the place
he knows they do, but he talks as if unions never compromise.

that said, his overall answer to this woman, other than what's in the OP, is very good. Very strong pro-union words. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
21. Public employee unions -- municipal, federal and teachers among them -- have been making concessions
for years. YEARS. They've made concessions in good times and now are being asked to shoulder some imaginary burden they have nothing to do with. This man is a disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reader Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. "[M]y friends in the public sector unions"???
Mr. President, you don't have any friends in the public sector unions. If you did, you'd have a clue how obscene and offensive it is, asking the middle class to sacrifice while continuing to coddle the rich.

Jeebus, is the man trying to lose in 2012?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_ed_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
23. Sounds just like his buddy Ronny Reagan
"Burden sharing" is DC code for "continuing to fuck over the poor and middle class."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC