Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYC's $600 Million Fraud due to Subcontracting/Privatization of (unionized) Civil Service Work

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-11 08:01 PM
Original message
NYC's $600 Million Fraud due to Subcontracting/Privatization of (unionized) Civil Service Work
New York’s $600 Million Fraud Shows Privatization Doesn’t Pay

Mischa Gaus | July 27, 2011


How did New York City plan to prevent time theft by city workers? By hiring contractors who would, it turns out, steal $600 million from the taxpayers. One of their crimes, prosecutors allege, was to file bogus timesheets claiming extra hours.

The payroll and timekeeping system called CityTime was originally supposed to cost $63 million but ballooned to $750 million over the last decade. It introduced biometric palm scanners to ensure city workers punched in and out appropriately.
Only rank-and-file workers were subject to the electronic surveillance, however; managers—and contractors—were exempt.

The fraud came as no surprise to Jon Forster. Secretary of AFSCME Local 375...... The union uncovered documents showing that CityTime was incurring $100 million price spikes each time the no-bid contract changed vendors.

snip

“This is the patronage agenda of corporate America, to evade the rules and regulations of merit and fitness that civil service established to limit patronage,” said Arthur Cheliotes, president of Communications Workers Local 1180, which represents the clerical workers who used to keep the city’s timecards.
The city has requested $600 million in repayment, but probably will get only a few hundred million.

LESS WORK FOR MORE MONEY

Forster says the fraud hasn’t taught city leaders anything about contracting out. Even if there had been zero fraud, privatizing still cost the city buckets of money.
CityTime consultants each made $400,000 annually, Forster said, while city employees who do the same work make $75,000.
Now the work is being handed back to those city employees (and 90 of them are doing the work of 200 consultants).

snip

Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a billionaire who owns the giant software and media firm that bears his name, has made shifting public services into private hands a hallmark of his three-term administration—despite mounting evidence that it costs the city much more.

snip

A study the union released two years ago showed that New York pays two and three times as much per hour for nurse, IT, and call-center contractors as it does for comparable city workers.

snip

“There’s something deeply contradictory happening when we can waste $600 million and threaten to close firehouses and fire teachers,” Forster said.

snip

http://labornotes.org/2011/07/new-york-600-million-fraud-shows-privatization-doesnt-pay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-11 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please, Democrats, pay attention to this story.
>>>>>Only rank-and-file workers were subject to the electronic surveillance, however; managers—and contractors—were exempt.>>>>>>

Weird. That's *exactly* the way the NYC school system runs. Teachers are micromanaged, multiply observed, multiply evaluated. Second-guessed, suspected, incriminated.

Meanwhile... the people who actually run ( i.e. control the content and quality of) , the classrooms, and the schools, ( that is: school administrators) are NOWHERE ON THE RADAR SCREEN..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-11 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please kick this to the top. This is the conservatives' goal for more theft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-11 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Privatization is beginning to look like a scam. They get large
amounts of money and do not always do a good job.
Remember Walter Reed story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-11 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. What do you mean "beginning"? It IS a scam. They just tap into the pipeline of taxpayer dollars.
Companies that specialize in "privatization" of public services are just looking for places to get lots of money very easily. They don't want to actually perform any "public service".

They go looking for a steady stream of taxpayer revenue and then they figure out a way to divert it into their "private" pockets.

It was never about efficiency. It was about greed and theft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-11 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Education is next folks. Step right up, open a bogus charter school.
Or just order up an emergency management millionaire and buy them a 40k vehicle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Isn't that what government contractors do?
I mean, isn't that the main reason (D)'s who aren't "in" government have always resisted the privatization of those jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erodriguez Donating Member (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC