Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mrs. Greenspan Didn't Seem Too Happy When The House Sgt. At Arms Backed Up Sheriff Dupnik

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:13 PM
Original message
Mrs. Greenspan Didn't Seem Too Happy When The House Sgt. At Arms Backed Up Sheriff Dupnik
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 02:18 PM by JimGinPA
Saying he was "Well respected in these parts" and agreed there was too much vitriol in politics lately. You could see it wasn't the answer she expected in response to her (leading) question saying he was being criticized for his remarks. That ended the interview.

Andrea Mitchell certainly doesn't have much of a poker face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. and funny the media doesn't want to accept the position of law enforcement
when that law enforcement is pointing the finger at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Actually that does not surprise me
it is hard for the purveyors to accept they are part of the problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The corporations are the ones supporting these tea bagger and
the media is one of the biggest corps...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Law enforcement supports gun control too.
Right wing loonies only want to support people who support all of their idiotic beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Especially that part where he says that he has no evidence...
... and it's just what he thinks it is (or should be)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. well, would you like to see a study that illustrates the effect of violent political rhetoric?
if so, you can read this:

http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:Fkhx1XcI1QIJ:sitemaker.umich.edu/kalmoe/files/kalmoe_-_political_violence.pdf+does+violent+political+rhetoric&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiwDAG3I-6UOJ7O83AGLLpTUkZ8xxjSzxi5-lY715OQVijprj7i4VYT7Jxd0tUFL-V525jazULAEKPbtYfdi5mCWBlXbgnwrBFrI0w1MC8QEffy4Hu1YvtmdMVE_Nu08EQ6Pe2s&sig=AHIEtbTd6eWhG_RxEeORRcSNVF0IHETLJA&pli=1

I know you have spent time on this site telling the Sheriff to shut up, but the reality is that there is data that indicates violent political rhetoric feeds political violence - from a study in Sept. 2010.

In addition, in lawless states, or states falling into anarchy, one of the prescriptions to deal with things like the genocide in Rwanda is to take eliminationist rhetoric spewing political agitators off the air.

but you go right ahead and continue to defend the right wing - that's what freedom of speech is about - it's NOT about lawmakers having to shut up when there is ample reason for them to note the level of vitriol from the right wing has crossed the boundaries of common decency.

have a great day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. There is a reason that the phrase "Agent Provocateur" exists
For some reason I think Niccolo Machiavelli would agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. That's just jingles...
... but the difference is that I can see the other side of the coin.

I see that as soon as the cry goes up to tramp down speech because of its possible inflammatory content the floodgates open and everything that someone doesn't like becomes "dangerous." The best case scenario is all we get is vanilla plain crap where everyone hugs and agrees and even that is unwanted and unrealistic.

I also have a problem with a Sheriff spouting his own beliefs in a manner that can degrade an investigation, divert attention away from true causes and possibly hurt a prosecution. I have a problem with a LEO taking the national stage to fan a fire instead of putting it out. That's because I am a professional and that is something the good Sheriff knows nothing about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. A study from a public ivy league university is "just jingles"
Is evolution also "just a theory?"

...and are you claiming this sheriff is not a professional - that his job is not also to help to "keep the peace?"

you're claiming you are better qualified to determine what is good for his county - you know more about the rhetoric from the tea party in his state than he does?

I would really like to understand the rationale that allows the leap of logic from calling for greater public civility in a time of national crisis to something that "degrades" an investigation.

In the context of this event - Giffords was on record talking about the the way in which violent political rhetoric had gone too far. Her opponent, with whom the sheriff is most certainly familiar, used a fundraiser that framed defeat of Gifford with shooting an M-16 for target practice.

For you to try to make a claim the sheriff is fanning the fire begs credulity. If someone speaks out to tell rabble rousers to tone it down- that's fanning flames? In a right wing upside down universe, I suppose it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Dang, what a post! Plus one!
Yup, in a bizarro world the sheriff is fanning the flames. Up is down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Thank you for calling out this bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. ha ha ha , the Sherrif was fanning a fire. LOL. CRAZY TALK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, it is really interesting why the media including some on MSNBC are working
so hard to say this act was not political (which may be true) but also, saying the rhetoric by Beck, Palin, Limbaugh & other right-wing extremists had nothing at all to do with this act. What is their game?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The answer to your question can be found
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 02:29 PM by FrenchieCat
Here:
A media that knows what it doesn’t know, and doesn’t know what it chooses
http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2011/01/10/a-media-that-knows-what-it-doesn’t-know-and-doesn’t-know-what-it-chooses/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Thanks FrenchieCat, appreciate it & will save that forum. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. +1 for the question. n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sheriff Dupnik has stolen the meme
M$Greedia can't handle this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. They will vilify sheriff dupnik as the real Villon in this story...wait
and see..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Funny how consistent and how quickly Ms. Greenspan and the other networks have
turned on the Sheriff.

Yes, they know who to blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. His common-sense remarks are at odds with the corporate hacks who lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. I disagree vehemently!
She has a poker face!



Andrea Mitchell c.2002-AP/Reuters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. LOLOL!
Terry Gilliam is better than money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Married to a Randroid
she's probably internalized the regard of community-minded rabble as "parasites." Dupnik is upsetting the Proper Order by humanizing vermin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sorry Andrea



Didn't work for you this time.

the true question for you is: Why do you people hate law enforcement so much that you want to demonize this sheriff?

Huh?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Years ago I thought Andrea was a mediocre
reporter. I never thought of her as a journalist. But in the last few years I have noticed unless she has a script she can't seem to get it together. I've also noticed when she is interviewing someone on her hourly sojourn she seems to be hesitating a great deal. As if she is floored by someone actually replying to her query. It is almost as if she fears she might say the wrong thing. Maybe I'm just being paranoid again, but that seems to be my lot in life these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. Blow it out your dainty little ass Andrea.



Isn't it time for her to retire?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. Why does that woman still have air time?
She is an embarrassment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Beltway Cocktail circuit connections -- political assassination can be so 'quaint'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
24. That damn liberal MSNBC! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC