Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Job Creators' Who Won't Hire The Unemployed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 12:13 PM
Original message
'Job Creators' Who Won't Hire The Unemployed
As President Obama hits the road on his jobs agenda bus tour, millions of individuals trying to re-enter the job market, seeking to eke out a modest living so that they too can live the American Dream – or what’s left of it anyway – are stuck in a rut. They write hundreds of cover letters, perfect their interview techniques and network like crazy, but sometimes the barriers are too high.

What some may not know is that a number of employers, including household-name companies, have taken the position that the unemployed should forget about obtaining a job altogether.

Log on to any jobs site, do a quick search and the results may surprise you: slews of job ads are essentially warning the out-of-work that they worthless and disposable.

Welcome to 21st Century, post-Recession hiring discrimination: where you must be an “employed or recently employed” person to get a job.

http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2011083211/so-you-want-get-back-workforce
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess they are not "job creators" then, just job *swappers.*
Edited on Sat Aug-13-11 12:21 PM by kenny blankenship
So maybe we can stop bowing and scraping and heaping terms of praise upon them as if they shat out golden eggs for the improvement of a society that is unworthy to receive their blessings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. This should be illegal.
But like so many other forms of discrimination, it is practiced right out in the open and nobody does anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. If they won't hire the unemployed....
then they won't mind if the unemployed no longer buy their product (or service).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's the same issue new grads have
No corporation wants to spend the money training new people and expanding the workforce, so they expect all job applicants to have at least a few years of experience. Except you obviously can't get experience without having a job first...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. that's just plain stupid.
If they won't hire the unemployed, who the heck are they supposed to hire? People who already have jobs they don't want to leave?

Capitalism is about the stupidest economic system the universe can come up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Lends a whole new meaning to the term "Catch 22"..
That phrase seems to pick up new meanings with depressing regularity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. There's a solution
Instead of just giving everybody another 2% FICA tax cut (mine is only about $20 a week, and I don't need it all that badly), why not allow employers who hire long term unemployed workers a break on FICA? You hire a person who's been out of work for a year, you don't have to pay FICA tax on that person's wages for a year, etc.

While I despise the weakening of the Social Security System by these tax holidays, at least they could be used to do something good, rather than dole money out to people who don't need it, like those at or above the cap, who might spend it on some luxury item.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC