Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Intriguing: "Boycott Campaign Donations!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Proud Public Servant Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 09:30 AM
Original message
Intriguing: "Boycott Campaign Donations!"
Can't say I have much respect for Howard Schultz's business, but this is an interesting idea:

Boycott Campaign Donations!
By JOE NOCERA

Howard Schultz, the chairman and chief executive of Starbucks, has always been the kind of boss who wears his heart on his sleeve. So it came as no surprise to Starbucks employees when, on Monday, he sent out a long, passionate, companywide e-mail entitled “Leading Through Uncertain Times.”

In it, he wrote about his frustration over “the lack of cooperation and irresponsibility among elected officials as they have put partisan agendas before the people’s agenda” — creating an enormous crisis of confidence in the process. He said that Starbucks had a responsibility “to act in ways that can ease the collective anxiety inside and outside the company.” It needed to continue creating jobs. It had to maintain its generous package of employee benefits. And it was critical, Schultz wrote, for employees “to earn our customers’ trust by being respectful of their own life situations — whatever it may be.”

No, the surprise wasn’t the e-mail; it was what happened next. Although he has made his share of campaign contributions — “to candidates in both parties,” he told me on Friday — Schultz is hardly a political activist. Yet the response to his e-mail — not only from within the company but among a group of some 50 business leaders he shared it with — was so overwhelming that it galvanized him.

*snip

In effect, Schultz thinks the country should go on strike against its politicians. “The fundamental problem,” he said, “is that the lens through which Congress approaches issues is re-election. The lifeblood of their re-election campaigns is political contributions.” Schultz wants his countrymen — big donors and small; corporations and unions — to stop making political contributions in presidential and Congressional campaigns. Simple as that. Economists like to talk about how incentives change behavior. Schultz is proposing that Americans give Washington an incentive to begin acting responsibly on their behalf. It’s a beautiful idea.

*more


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/13/opinion/nocera-boycott-campaign-donations.html?_r=1&ref=opinion

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't worry, Karl Rove's Crossroads will cover the Republicans needs
Big lie ads 24/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. that has got to be the single dumbest idea I have seen in quite some time
It would be one thing if both parties were being the obstructionists the GOP were, but they aren't. The GOP's money supply will continue unabated, while the Dem supply will dry up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Public Servant Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Dems aren't obstructionist, but
they have been pretty ineffectual, and had no excuse for being so in 2009-2010; one can only imagine (and shudders to think) what the GOP would have done with majorities that large in both houses of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. IMO, this is a terrible idea.
Think about it. Who ISN'T going to join a boycott like this? The powerful interests who give money to candidates precisely because they want to get something in return. They'd be more than happy to pick up the slack. Plus I'm sure they'd really appreciate the fact that they aren't competing for political access against all the rest of us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Public Servant Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, I realize that's the fatal flaw
But it would be intriguing if it worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Starbucks boss cancels megachurch appearance after congregation is accused of being anti-gay
The boss of coffee giant Starbucks has pulled out giving a speech at one of the biggest megachurches in the U.S. following allegations that its congregation is homophobic.

CEO Howard Schultz cancelled his appearance at The Global Summit, which is organised by the Willow Creek Association, after an online petition condemned its followers for being anti-gay - a claim the church has denied.

The coffee boss was due to speak at the church on Friday, in Barrington, Illinois - an event that draws tens of thousands of viewers via satellite.

Past speakers have included former President Bill Clinton, GE's Jack Welch and rock singer Bono.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2025545/Starbucks-boss-cancels-megachurch-appearance-congregation-accused-anti-gay.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. What percentage comes from citizens vs corporations?
Especially with Citizen's United. I'm no longer wasting my few bucks when Shell Oil will happily give each candidate hundreds of thousands to ensure their place at the big table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. Unrec for effectively calling for unilateral disarmament by Democrats


This idea would result in giving the GOP an completely overwhelming advantage in every single race.


DUMB DUMB DUMB.


If you agree with this idea, you're a moron or a Republican (but I repeat myself).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. If he's recommending 100% publically funded campaigns
Edited on Sat Aug-13-11 10:32 AM by demwing
then I agree 100%

but that's not the message. He's calling for a consumer based solution to a citizen based problem, and that won't solve a damn thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC