Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Technically not oil you are scarfing down with your tarballs--I mean shrimp

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 09:31 AM
Original message
Technically not oil you are scarfing down with your tarballs--I mean shrimp
GULF OF MEXICO - An area of the Gulf of Mexico currently closed to shrimpers could soon reopen.
That's despite conflicting reports of oil being found out there...

<snip>

Patti says a friend with a shrimping boat is working for NOAA in that area and told him his nets came out of the water covered in oil.

"He was in 1,225 feet of water and one side was loaded with oil the other side didn't have any oil it had some tarballs in it and a few shrimp. But the other side was polluted."

But NOAA's seafood safety manager says Patti's claims are exaggerated. Doctor John Stein told me the shrimping nets were covered in an abnormally high number of unweathered gooey tarballs but that it technically wasn't liquid oil.

http://www.weartv.com/newsroom/features/coastal-crisis/videos/vid_845.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's like saying ice is technically not liquid water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Gulf shrimp..pre-oiled for your convenience
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Just keep your cooking fire low. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. & stand back n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Rec'd. My cats won't even touch canned pet seafood anymore.
I trust their senses more than the NOAA's corporate complicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. But that is how the tested the shrimp before
all they did was give it the sniff test
and declared it safe
cats have much better sense of smell
and they cuddle better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. that's pretty telling!
wow! government needs cats to do the sniff test!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC