Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I can't find that "Cross hairs" symbol used on any survey map

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:18 PM
Original message
I can't find that "Cross hairs" symbol used on any survey map

I will admit that I can find places where a vertical line and a horizontal line meet at right angles, but I can't find a circle around it. Shouldn't someone be asked to provide proof that this is a symbol used on maps?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ummmm...
Because it's not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Guess what? Palin's mouthpiece is full of crap....
I looked high and low as well and found nothing that looked like crosshairs amongst surveyor's symbols.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. See, there you go with your leftist eyes! It's right there.
If you take a racetrack symbol and superimpose it over an airport symbol, you have something that looks something like a crosshair! It's right there! Doncha see???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. for Airplane Races !!!! Of Course, how could I have missed that one?
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yelp uses something similar to pinpoint your current location on a map.
I'm looking at an iPhone app.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. they said survey map
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Two of my Disney apps use it also.
I'm not sure if it's a surveying thing, but it seems to be a map thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. some GPS use it too, that isn't the point. They said survey map
Combine this with words like Reload, Target and Take Aim and then weigh it against the fact that they are wrong about where that symbol might appear.

It is clear that they are lying about what they intended it to imply





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. This is what you are looking for...
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 09:44 PM by dkf


Oops. It's a freeper site. Didn't see the bottom.

Delete delete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Andrew Breitbart has some symbols with no link to where he got them
Nice



IMO this is more proof that they are NOT used on survey maps


Please find me an actual map created before the shooting that uses these symbols for evidence. Not something Breitbart created after the fact.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karia Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've worked with survey maps
and never seen that symbol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. ....she's a coward
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. You should send this to some of the news shows
I doubt they have done the research, and are just running with the Palin camp's statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thank you for proving their lie so fast...Limpballs, Micfailin are you
reading this? You guys just should give up now, we got you red handed and I mean that. Stop telling your followers to go kill people, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. The "cactus horizontal control" kinda sorta almost looks like crosshairs
Could it be that Palin was a cactusophobe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. the triangle disqualifies it IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Dang!
I was trying to give them the benefit of the doubt.

I guess there is none now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. Nice find!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Because it is not
I have used topo maps in rescue... nope, they are not used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Petrushka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. I've seen that "crosshairs" symbol on topo maps filed with coal mining permit applications.
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 10:16 PM by Petrushka
At the following USGS link, about three-quarters of the way down the page, you'll find that same symbol under Control Data and Monuments . . . Principal Point** . . . in the right-hand column:

http://egsc.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/booklets/symbols/topomapsymbols.pdf
http://nyfalls.com/maps-topo-key.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
36. Nope, it's not the same symbol
Look closer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. Close but no cigar
Notice how the lines of the cross hairs extend out beyond the circle (unlike the symbol you claim is the same)? Also the interior of the circle is shaded in the cross hairs but not in the survey symbol.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. The GIS software that I use (ESRI) includes the symbol in the standard point
symbol set, but it doesn't seem to be a pre-defined mark for a specific feature type.

That's not really the issue, though - it doesn't matter whether or not a circle with a cross over it has been used on a map before, the point is that the Palin map was clearly intended to refer to gun sights (and if you'd asked freeper-types what they were two weeks ago, 100% of them would have said so)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. Wikipedia says reticles, Aka crosshairs, are used for surveying, telescopes, and rifles.
"A reticle is a net of fine lines or fibers in the eyepiece of a sighting device, such as a telescope, a telescopic sight, a microscope, or the screen of an oscilloscope. The word reticle comes from the Latin "reticulum," meaning "net." Today, engraved lines or embedded fibers may be replaced by a computer-generated image superimposed on a screen or eyepiece. There are many variations of reticles; this article concerns itself mainly with a simple reticle: crosshairs.

Crosshairs are most commonly represented as intersecting lines in the shape of a cross, "+", though many variations exist, including dots, posts, circles, scales, chevrons, or a combination of these. Most commonly associated with telescopic sights for aiming firearms, crosshairs are also common in optical instruments used for astronomy and surveying, and are also popular in graphical user interfaces as a precision pointer. The reticle is said to have been invented by Robert Hooke, and dates to the 17th century.<1>"

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reticle?wasRedirected=true

I honestly don't know if there are official surveyors symbols. There seem to be a bunch of variations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. The reticle is used in a surveying transit or theodolite.
Both are optical devices used to measure elevation and angle; line of sight is taken to a stick marked with elevation points.

And any discussion of whether these are supposed to be survey marks is pretty ridiculous anyway; "we're targeting these seats!" is pretty much the intent of the graphic. I sort of suspect anyone who sees that is going to think "rifle scope" before they'd think "surveyor's mark".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yeah I'm not sure if it's possible to prove exactly what Palin's symbol is.
But it's obvious what the intent is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Petrushka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Is that "intent" anything like the bullseye target symbol used in '04 by Democrats? --->
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I'd say she was targeting them.
I wonder if she is malevolent enough to want them dead. I think she is a little more sane than that but who knows. She strikes me as pretty immune to any harm she causes, cavalier even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Dunno, did any Dem use language back then to suggest their voting base go
out and kill someone? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Petrushka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Not that I know or heard of . . . well, not unless "picking off" Republicans to stop 'em dead [uh]
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 12:29 AM by Petrushka
means what the #1 definition from the Cambridge Dictionary of American Idioms indicates, viz:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pick somebody/something off also pick somebody/something off

1. to kill or shoot one person or animal at a time. Snipers picked the soldiers off one by one. The birds
in the nest were picked off by hawks.


2. to select and attack or defeat a particular person or group. During the race I just picked off the runners
ahead of me one at a time. We try to identify these criminal groups and pick their leaders off before they can
cause too much trouble. The Republicans picked off Democrats in Oklahoma, Alabama, and Mississippi in the last
election.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:shrug:

Will Marshall (2004):
"But now Democrats should fight back with a realignment strategy of their own. They need to raid the red states,
picking off enough to stop the Republican realignment dead in its tracks, and start building a new progressive majority."

http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=253055&kaid=127&subid=171
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. and it did not say that it is used on survey maps
I use a transit in my work (occasionally) and I know full well that there is a vertical line along with one or more horizontal lines in the scope (depending on the model).

But they said it was found on survey maps, it isn't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. I believe what she is attempting to scam off of is... what is called the "principal point".
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 11:58 PM by Ellipsis
In the day... We put together a Hardware/software Spec. for an open system GIS (geographical information system) solution for the state Wisconsin. From what I remember it's a photogrammetry term, not really a surveyors symbol it marks the center of an aerial photograph which would later be converted into topographic and tagged data. From what I remember it's transitory reference symbol not used in the final image.





It's major fail.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
29. They are lying and they know they are lying.
I think it was Keith who addressed this tonight. The "surveyor's symbol" idea arose in a phone conversation that somebody in the RW media had with Palin today or yesterday. Palin was mumbling about how it wasn't crosshairs but she didn't say what it was. Then THE INTERVIEWER piped up and said "it was a surveyor's symbol" and Palin agreed that "yeah, it was a surveyor's symbol." Keith also showed a Palin tweet that unambiguously verified that she considered them crosshairs.

The wingnuts all know what they were and what happened and I'm sure many are pleased with the outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOPZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
31. Maybe it's one of those things Palin sees from her house, like Russia nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
32. Well, well. Game, set, match.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
33. Weather Underground uses a similar symbol


But that's beside the point. According to Palin, they were always bullseyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
34. "Cut; fill" looks like Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
35. The only thing I can compare it to are the color grids used for printing
They line up the colors so that they blend in an optimum manner. Each grid has a different color. I've been out of the publishing business for awhile so I don't know if those are still being used in color printing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
39. Here's a construction laser target
Not the same, but close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC