The White House: The White House doesn't create jobs," Carney said, adding "the government, together

[DFab420]

White House, Congress — creates policies that allow for greater job creation."

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/white-house-we-dont-create-jobs-2011-8#ixzz1U5mLKxlt


If you want to read the whole story and not just parts....

[nadinbrzezinski]

1. And they are still channeling hoover

[gratuitous]

2. Maybe they could create a few more food inspector jobs

Or are they counting on some fat contributions from Cargill?

[DFab420]

4. ?

food inspectors? was there something about fetted food due to lack of inspectors that I missed recently?

Cause that would suck.

[gratuitous]

6. A recall of ground turkey traced to a Cargill plant in Arkansas

Only 36 million pounds, though:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44018941

[girl gone mad]

3. Just a completely idiotic statement..

start to finish.

[DFab420]

5. Really? So the Legislative and Executive branches aren't both required to

pass legislation enacting policies and law?

Man someone should tell those idiots in Washington they don't need to worry about the different branches of Government......

[KittyWampus]

7. LOL! DU'ers have gone off the rails.

[phleshdef]

9. No, its 100% undeniable truth. The White House needs Congress to cooperate to create jobs.

Show me anywhere in history that this was not the case anytime government was instrumental in job creation. Show me one god damn significant instance.

[jwirr]

8. That is a basic policy but in times of deep economic problems

government CAN create jobs to stimulate the economy. One policy does not negate the other. They can be used together to maintain a stable economy.

[pwb]

10. Bush did it, Texas has almost all of our federal agencies there now.

Obama should move agencies to blue states, just like bush moved them to red ones.