Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A primary challenger for Obama in 2012? Nonsense--it's far too late for that

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 12:28 AM
Original message
A primary challenger for Obama in 2012? Nonsense--it's far too late for that
Please join me in looking for a progressive candidate to support in 2016. Two or three years from now will be too late.

1. Get as many progressives as possible to be precinct captains in local Dem organizations.
2. Find and develop progressive candidates at local and state levels--or become one yourself.
3. Establish a message that public goods are GOOD, in order to unite pregressive issue groups behind a single solid message. If we repeat that often enough, maybe we can drown out the message that government and taxes are inherently bad except for taking money from little people and giving it to conservative campaign donors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'll be voting for Alan Grayson in 2016. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. You need to do more than that. All of us need to be actively soliciting
--presidential runs from people like Grayson, Feingold, etc. We have to build the infrastructure early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sure, but keep in mind that by then the Wealth Care and Profit Protection Racket
will be in full swing, probably Social Security and Medicare will be cut, we'll still be in resource wars, the wealth disparity will continue to grow, huge cuts in discretionary spending will be sucking the demand out of the economy, and we will be in the midst of a "lost decade" or two so the Democratic brand will be shit and we'll have nothing to run on, widespread public mistrust, and a ruined brand.

Our options are to dump Obama and turn over leadership or the party will be dead as fried chicken by 2016.

The only and best hope is that the TeaPubliKlans keep imploding too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalidurga Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hoping the teapublicans keep imploding is like....
hoping the sun will come out tomorrow. Of course, they will keep imploding. The biggest problem is these teatards are making the rest of the Republicans look sane by comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Everything is going into the shitter regardless of who wins in 2012
With Obama, it will be a slower ride down. That's exactly why we need a well-planned progressive counterattack in 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Progressive will mean Republican in 2016 if this rightward slide continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I see no option but starting to build now at the local level
Reinstitute Dean's program--although this time we'll have to do it without national party backing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. 2016 is too late!
It's not just us on DU. Tonight I listened to a large conference call held by my congressman. A very high percentage of the callers voted for higher taxes for the rich and no cuts whatsoever to Medicare or Social Security.

Obama is clearly out of sync with the voters.

If we don't get a third party candidate from within the Democratic Party, there will probably be a strong challenger from outside.

I would prefer a Democratic challenger. Obama should concede that he is not representing the wishes of the majority of Democratic voters -- and announce that he will not run in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I don't agree. We have to fight for progressive candidates at lower levels than
--the presidency. Meanwhile, there is barely enough time to get a progressive electoral politics structure in place before 2016. Sometimes that will mean acting within local Democratic organizations, sometimes outside of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. That would be the honorable thing to do, but don't hold your breath.
I agree, 2016 is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too late to save this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. If only Dems felt that way in 1938
but then again, they didn't have the internet and instant information at their fingertips.

Yet, they still made reelection happen and turned around the 1937/8 recession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Nope...
if Al Gore entered, Obama would be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Al Gore, per his own comments, is done with electoral politucs b/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. oh I'm aware of that, but he would easily walk away with the primary. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC