Just think about it. Bill Gates and Rupert Murdoch have had the nerve to use the talking point sent out by the DLC in 2007.....that public schools are a monopoly of the government. I don't know who thought that up, but it is not a very smart argument. It's propaganda.
What is so frustrating is that Arne Duncan has in effect turned policy over to Bill Gates and other billionaires. They have taken full advantage of that power.
Gates admits all his billions have not brought about much improvement. In fact after recently using the "monopoly" talking point again, Gates talked about his preference for private schools. He actually says the politics are too tough right now to get vouchers done for those schools.
Bill Gates has the blues.Pic courtesy of Schooling in the Ownership SocietyIn the interview, Gates admits that the investment he and other power philanthropists have made in corporate-style school reform, "hasn't led to significant improvements."
Actually, one of those reforms was showing significant improvement until Gates began investing in it. Gates money turned a promising small-schools movement into a charter school privatization initiative. The foundation pulled back on its investment when test scores and college rates failed to increase fast enough for Gates.
..."If Bill had his druthers, he would favor privatization and charters, but he's afraid of even more resistance -- some innovator!
He praises the private school model for its efficiency vis-à-vis traditional public schools, noting that the "parochial school system, per dollar spent, is an excellent school system." But the politics, he says, are just too tough right now. "We haven't chosen to get behind (vouchers) in a big way, as we have with personnel systems or charters, because the negativity about them is very, very high."
Last year Rupert Murdoch said the same thing about the public school monopoly.
Murdoch...Public ed is a "near monopoly"Pic courtesy or Schooling in the Ownership SocietyLast year, Rupert Murdoch, owner of the world's second largest communications conglomerate, went on a tirade against U.S. public education, calling it a "near monopoly." It wasn't clear if Rupert meant that as a compliment or criticism for only achieving near status.
Murdoch has also referred to public schools as "failure factories." He sounds an awful lot like Bill Gates or Arne Duncan who often refers to inner-city high schools as "dropout factories".
The days of America as the unrivaled world leader in public education seem to be gone, Murdoch said. He called the existing system a “near-monopoly” and said teachers aren’t being hired and fired based on performance. “We have tougher standards on ‘American Idol,’” the singing-competition TV show on his Fox network, he said.--
These are two of the "reformers" who are being given almost total access to our public school system. Arne Duncan, speaking for the policies of President Obama, is giving them power.
Where did they get this idea that public schools are a "monopoly"? Glad you asked. From 2007 here are the words of the DLC about that "monopoly."
DLC refers to public school system..."monopoly power of failed traditional schools"Wow, that should have been enough to make us alert right there.
The Memo refers to the Supreme Decision this week to tout NCLB and make public schools sound inferior:
"We understand the frustrations of many parents and educators with the No Child Left Behind initiative as currently constituted, and as so often underfunded and ill-directed by the Bush administration. But it has done some good, as a recent study by the Center on Education Policy demonstrated. More importantly, its basic concepts, including investments matched with accountability, and the ability to create new public charter schools to challenge the monopoly power of failed traditional schools, remain critical to any successful national narrowing of the achievement gap, and to the dream of educational equality embraced in Brown v. Board of Education."
Failed traditional schools? That started in the 80s with Reagan's Nation at Risk. It was a defective report, but no media ever reported that at all.
The criticism of the failing teachers and failing schools stuck like glue, and all that was needed was a Democratic administration 3 decades later to put everything in place for the reformers.