Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who would you TRUST on the Senate Super Congress?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:04 PM
Original message
Who would you TRUST on the Senate Super Congress?
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 12:39 PM by Laura PourMeADrink
I would wholeheartedly trust Kerry and Boxer


JUST FYI...
Retiring as of 2012

D's

Bingaman
Herb Kohl
Jim Webb
Daniel Akaka
Kent Conrad


R's
Kay Baily Hutchison
John Kyl

I's
Lieberman


Dems Seeking Reelection
Sherrod Brown, Feinstein, Carper, Nelson (FL), Cardin, Stabenow, Klobucher, McCaskill, Tester, Nelson (NE), Menendez,
Gillibrand,Casey, Whitehouse, Manchin, Sanders, and Cantwell

Dems Voting No on Debt Ceiling Bill
Menendez
Gillibrand
Harkin
Lautenberg
Merkley
Nelson
I-Sanders



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bernie Sanders n/t
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 12:06 PM by OhioChick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Pity he can't sit on the panel.
He is the only one I would trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. is that true? No indie can be picked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
40. It was written for 3 members from each party, both houses.
Members to be chosen by their party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. None of those traitors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. you mean the retirees? or anyone who said yes? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I meant those listed in the OP
They are all corporate tools.

The complete list of Senators that would be included in the same category is too long to post here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RyanPsych Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. For the Dems
Bernie Sanders, Al Franken, Nancy Pelosi...all I got off the top of my head. I would have said Anthony Weiner but...yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Boxer, Franken, Sanders. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. so, they can pick an Indie in our caucus?
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 12:10 PM by Laura PourMeADrink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. The corporations ONLY need to buy off ONE person to kill us all.
It's clear that the Republicans picked will be happy to vote against the American people. That leaves ONE voice that needs to be bought to get their crap passed. I trust no one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The Dem members selected will more than likely not need to be bought off. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. It only takes 1 of 6 to get a majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. 1 of 6? you mean 1 of 3?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
41. Nope. Committee is 12. 7 Gets it to the floor.
Laura, pour me one too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. You got it!
One person to agree and get the hell out if politics. That is the plan. It's a setup. Remember this when you get totally screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. I do not trust anyone who relies on "triggers".
I do not support this bogus body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Cutting the debt should not BE in a Super Congress in the first place.
This is major legislation that will affect every single American. There is a reason our Congress was set up to include representation from ALL parts of the country, and with safeguards that allow the people's representatives to amend or filibuster during the process.

Putting debt reduction into a Super Congress is a way to fast-track and shove legislation through while reducing accountability to the people. It concentrates power in the hands of a few, chosen legislators while shutting out or vastly reducing the power of others, and it reduces the ability of Americans to defend themselves against the final product.

It is a con and an outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Nobody. The Junta is set up to slash Democratic interests in the throat.
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 12:28 PM by kenny blankenship
and that's what it will do, no matter who's on it. The Dems that are on it will be those who most agree with the Repukes, and who are most in the pocket of Big Money lobbies of one kind or another. You can't have a committee of people who disagree fundamentally. Pukes will put their bombthrowers on, because they know the purpose of the Junta is to cut Democratic throats. Dems will put "reasonable", "responsible" people on it, who agree with the aims of the Republicans, who will always find a way (an excuse, that is) to make a "deal", even though they may make regretful sounds and shake their heads a lot in public. It will go like a house on fire, and in only one way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. For the Democrats
I'd like to see Al Franken, Jeff Merkley and Bernie Sanders.

For the Republicans, maybe Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond and Larry Craig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. lol...hope they don't have a quorum rule. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. I can't think of any of our 537 elected representatives that I'd trust
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 12:38 PM by cherokeeprogressive
to carry dogshit to the trash at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. At this point, considering the way everything is set up, no one.
Except maybe the Dem Senators who voted NO on the Debt deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. Ds I would trust include Akaka, Kerry, Boxer, Whitehouse
Cantwell, Coons, Franken, Blumenthal, Kohl, Levin, Murray, Reed, Wyden, Gillibrand, Begich, Casey, McCaskill and Klobucher.

Rs I would trust make a shorter list: Collins, Hutchison, Lugar, Murkowski, Snowe and Portman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Kohl, McCaskill and Klobuchar scare me...they're too blue dog for my taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Marcy Kaptur, Dennis Kuchnich and?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. I would pick the Senators who voted "no" on this deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
50. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Same except McCaskill. All she wants is cut, cut, cut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. yup...reelection, reelection, reelection...in swing state to boot...BUT
Obama loves her, right? Does he get to pick or Reid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
29. Bernie Sanders, as an independent, should be on the commission
because he is one of the few voices that represent millions and millions of Americans whose voices do not otherwise get heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. What do you bet they put Lieberman
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 01:06 PM by Liberalynn
on as the independent? I just don't trust these asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. the meetings will have to be held on Saturdays
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. I don't trust them either. I have given up hope for anything good from the U.S. politcal system
I do wonder about the things Emmanuel Todd wrote about the fall of the American empire back in 2000-ish.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
30. Kristin Gillibrand ROCKS
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 12:52 PM by Liberalynn
I would love to see her on this committee, though I doubt the asses that are TPTB will put her there. She's got too much integrity and cares too much about her constituents.

So proud of her that she voted no on this piece of crap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. how's her reelection looking? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. No one's really started talking about the upcoming election yet;
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 01:05 PM by Liberalynn
I haven't heard any names being put up by the Pukes to challenge her so far. I think she's got a really good shot at re-election though. It seemed a lot of people were leery of her when Governor Patterson first appointed her but now the consensus seems to be she is doing a great job. Our local paper has an article almost every day on how she has really become a champion of veterans' rights and I think that is winning her a lot of support from both Democrats and even some Republicans.

I love her because she was against the Payroll Tax Holiday and she also signed onto Sen Whitehouse's proposed (but sadly ignored) bill that would have exempted the big three in any future budget cut showdowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. according to wikipedia..
Scott Noren (D) George Maragos (R) are announced candidates.

It must be great to have a senator you can admire ! You lucky dog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Thank you!
We sure did get lucky with her. She's getting a thank you e-mail and I am going to see if there are any local opportunities to volunteer for her campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. that's the spirti ! you go girl ! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
37. Of the current crop - no one. Why would anyone advocate putting foxes (or
weasels) in the henhouse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. well, aren't there really bad foxes and moderately bad foxes? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
42. please repost this as a poll--it's not just individuals I don't trust but the very concept
that deep, across the board cuts are needed.

Somehow, I suspect that no matter what, the wealthy will be spared, and the rest of us will end up boiling our shoes for food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. polls only have 10 options, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
43. Out country is on the brink of being totally taken over the the fascists
and people are playing "Fantasy Land, What If". People think elections still work? No they don't, not since 2000.
What we have now is basically a one party system, with a few renegades allowed to speak so we think we still have a chance to escape the coming serfdom.

What's needed is a big enough, noisy crowd on the White House lawn to surround the White House to scare the hell out of them.
Probable destroy the grass, but we can worry about that later.

Let them know "We the People..." mentioned in the Constitution, that quaint, outdated peace of paper, want control of our country back. Remind our servants that are supposed to be representing us in WDC, that the Constitution is not so outdated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
44. I'm having a hard time trusting anyone in Congress - let alone any Super Congress.
However I'd want Bernie Sanders and Al Franken on there if I had to pick anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
46. Me. Just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC