Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My suggestion for a more accurate Obama 2012 bumper sticker

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
GaYellowDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:20 PM
Original message
My suggestion for a more accurate Obama 2012 bumper sticker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. What would you have done?
I'm curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I would have threatened to veto anything other than a clean raise of the cap
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 09:36 PM by demwing
and then gone on TV, explained THE FUCK out of my position, called Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi in and said DO THIS! I don't care HOW, just DO IT!

And I'd get Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Howard Dean, and every other surrogate I could think of to toe the line and stand firm against the Tea Bag bullshit.

Finally, I would have shook avery hand, twisted every arm, and rattled every skeleton in every DC closet to get what America needed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GaYellowDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I would never have been in this situation in the first place.
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 09:39 PM by GaYellowDawg
If I'd been elected in 2008, I would have taken my 70% approval rating to the Conservadems and told them that I was going to retain Howard Dean to primary their miserable asses in 2010 with my bully pulpit and the full weight of the National Democratic Party if they didn't fall in line. Then I would have told the nation that 2000-2008 was a grand experiment on the economic and foreign policies of the far right, and it was an abject failure. Then my motto would have been "Compromise with failure results in failure" and steamrollered the Republican Party. I would have removed the 65 and over requirement from Medicare and required an income-adjusted input from every American. I would have closed Guantanamo and immediately moved to get every soldier out of Iraq ASAP. I would have directed the SEC to bring up every single Wall Street bastard on charges possible, and I would have charged Bush, Cheney, and every member of the Bush cabinet with war crimes. I would have attacked the Republicans on so many fronts that they wouldn't know where to begin to defend themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreamnightwind Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Great response
And, except for about 20%, this country was ready for such changes, in fact we were expecting them. Not aggressively pushing for a new political reality allowed the Repubs and the Tea Party corporate shells to create their own, insanely wrong, version of reality. The right was entirely discredited, in ruins, in 2009. This administration's stubborn "centrism" (really corporatism since the center is where the people say it is) enabled a very different outcome than the one we voted for in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Ignore the debt limit.
Congress has passed two contradictory laws. The debt limit and the budget.

Honoring the budget is illegal because of the debt limit.
Honoring the debt limit is illegal because of the budget.

In previous instances where Congress managed to pass contradictory laws, the executive branch picked one to enforce until Congress resolved the conflict.

So, I'd have ignored the limit until Congress either raised the limit or passed a smaller budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonfli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Honest bumper sticker at least /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Truth in advertising.
Buckle up, it's going to be a rough ride.

I didn't vote for a Moderate Conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm disappointed how it turned out and how it was carried out.
But I figure we can mope, weep, grumble or organize and be prepared for the hearings of the "Super Committee".

This process has beeh given a lot of power and the Whitehouse is now aware that anything they want to do will be carried by a gnat's ass margin. Progressives had better get in on Power Brokering with the little leverage we have or we'll be reduced to an angry fringe.

Clever Bumpersticker expressing real frustration. Sure, I understand. But, tonight we grouse, tomorrow we organize!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonfli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Makes sense, hell we have 80% of the people with us, Obama and his Republican party only Represent
20%

They may go against what they were all elected to do for the enrichment of their friends,
but by God they should be deafened by the cry of the majority!
We should organize and make it plain at least that whoever they are working for, it is most assuredly not ther American people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC