Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"An explosive development in the scandal" Why Rupert Murdoch cried himself to sleep last night

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:40 PM
Original message
"An explosive development in the scandal" Why Rupert Murdoch cried himself to sleep last night
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 02:46 PM by Snoutport
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/martin-hickman-this-marks-an-explosive-development-in-the-scandal-2328633.html

"Some of the targets of these techniques had more to lose than their privacy. While vile and disgusting, the alleged eavesdropping of Milly Dowler, war widows and Sara Payne did not endanger life and limb. The alleged targeting of ex-intelligence officers with knowledge of IRA informers could have.

Tuleta may also draw other titles and newspaper groups into the scandal. It is likely to focus on the activities of Jonathan Rees, a private detective who worked for News International and the Mirror Group. While police investigated Mr Rees over the murder of his business partner Danny Morgan in 1987, they bugged his office and recorded his conversations with reporters."

Ladies and Gentlemen of DU...

I do believe the hacking scandal is about to accomplish several things:

We will see that Murdoch's minions interfered with government.
We will see a planned attack on liberal members of the government that will cause the break up of Rupert Murdoch's holdings in the UK.
The conservative Government in the UK will fall due to being such good mates with Rupert Murdoch and his army of minions.
The Murdoch's will probably lose their positions in their companies and the result will be business that is more about business and less about the brainwashing of the people it serves.

But most importantly...the right wing is losing its mouthpiece. The right has risen to power due to the steady drumbeat of anti-liberal messages by Murdoch's empire. When Murdoch is out of the picture then the right has lost their mouthpiece.

The days of Murdoch's influence is almost over. Have a great weekend. I spent four days camping and it has renewed my love for my country. It is worth fighting for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would love it if NewsCorp was totally discredited before the election starts up
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I do think you'll get your wish!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. ARTICLE ABOUT THE NEW PROBE...VERY INFORMATIVE (LINK)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. News of the World targeted phone of Sarah Payne's mother
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jul/28/phone-hacking-sarah-payne

just in case you missed this story.... Sarah Payne was a cute little girl who was abducted and murdered by a known child sex offender. Rebekah Brooks, then editor of News of the World gave Sarah Payne's mom a phone to keep in contact with everybody... little did she know that the phone was set so that Rupert Murdoch's employees would have easy access to the mom's messages.

Devious. Despicable. Lower than a snake's belly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. WORSE even...they might have been hacking the cop investigating the girl's murder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #32
74. Mr. Underhill! Wasn't it Mr. Underhill that brought down Sauron in the end?
Any Talkien aficionados here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Blue Flower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #74
83. Good catch
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. I want Murdoch and his spawn to live forever. In a card board
box. take that batshit wife with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. ah...at least he knows she has his back
probably the only person in the world who does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
48. true. but someone needs to hand her a mirror to practice neutral
facial expressions if she intends to go to hearings. She looked like an entitlement queen who had to cancel a manicure at the parliamentary hearings. that doesn't help him. I truly thought I hated him until I saw her pout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrollBuster9090 Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
56. Ideally, it would be best if the scandal spreads to FNC JUST as the election is getting underway.
So that Fox News:

a) BECOMES one of the election issues,
b) has to spend all of their time and energy spinning defensive propaganda to protect themselves, rather than spinning offensive propaganda against Democrats, and
c) given the number of current and former Republican politicians that work at Fox, splashes the GOP by association with a sleazeball criminal enterprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #56
64. Ideally, there are treason trials and executions. Dozens of them.
But we don't live in an ideal world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. If it is shown that ONE government computer was hacked, all Hell will rain down on Mordock.
It will be shown to be an ongoing criminal enterprise, with questionable national loyalties, exposing state secrets to who knows who?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Except the big international banks ( including our big 5 ) are also know to be
"ongoing criminal enterprise, with questionable national loyalties, exposing state secrets to who knows who?"
and nothing has happened to them.

color me skeptical of any serious outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Any loss of his influence is a win
He didn't take over England's BSkyB AND News Corp is now thinking of getting out of the newspaper industry. News of the WOlrd brainwashed 2.6 million readers (plus any additional reader...imagine how many people read a newspaper in a cafe in a week. How many in a Dr's office or a waiting room. All those people are reading something else now.

When the world's largest paper closes and no longer poisons the general public's mind...you GOTTA take that as a win!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Yes he has already lost power and influence
but I'm greedy - I want way more :fistbump:

Down he comes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I'm already thinking of curling up with a cup of coffee to read monday's news
I don't usually follow stories like this but....jeez...I am loving all the stories to read on the scandal.

What did I miss while I was gone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
46. But How many Americans are Readers?!? I would wager not very many!
We don't read no stinkin' newspapers. Give us Fox News 24/7 and they'll do our thinkin' for us.

Oh, and Fox News is currently on in a lot of business establishments. Americans like to be told what to think. We are a nation of very lazy mentally challenged people.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrollBuster9090 Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #46
54. Fox is part of the Murdoch empire. If the scandal takes down the newspapers, it will send
shockwaves through his TV empire, too. In fact, it already has, in Europe. And not just in the form of "cosmetic" problems that can be solved by the CEO of the paper or TV network resigning, or changing the name but not the staff of the paper. We're talking stockholder revolts, here. Wherever MONEY is effected, it's serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #46
77. He's losing his most trusted employees...the ones who have lock stepped in line
in line behind him. A Commander with no generals has a hard time getting much done...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #19
66. They'll probably migrate to the Mail on Sunday to get their reich wing brainwashing fix
Or the Sunday Express.

Unfortunately, The (daily) Sun still exists and as far as Sunday papers go the MoS and the SE are much more dangerous to Britain's mindset than the NoW was. I know from 1st hand experience as my step mother is a huge fan of MoS - and the Daily version - and she is the archetypal English wingnut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
47. I keep telling people how to take those banks down...but nobody listens.
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 10:09 PM by Chan790
They're looking for proof of mortgage fraud and other white-collar financial crimes; they should be looking for OFAC violations. That's the juicy, destroy-the-bank stuff; that's what gives bank executives nightmares; there is no too big to be charged with these kinds of crimes (everything from obs. of justice to RICO to money laundering and terrorism) when they involve national security. I'm ahead of myself here.

There is a US intelligence agency organized under the US Dept. of the Treasury called OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) whose purpose for existence is to ID, disrupt and seize the assets of terrorists, drug cartels, rogue states, weapons traffickers and foreign agents of espionage.

What does this have to do with banks? Banks (and any business engaged in international trade for that matter) are required to act to insure they're not in violation of holding these accounts, doing business with restricted parties or being used to conduct or obscure financial crimes of this type; also to maintain comprehensive OFAC compliance...the penalties are very severe and related subsequent acts are actionable. (i.e you knowingly (or should have known) launder money used to finance an assassination, you can be charged with murder.) Even unintentional violations (such as those resulting from poor operational control, ineptitude or failure to maintain compliance) are treated as criminal...just ask Riggs Bank. (If being the house-bank of the CIA and having the uncle and brother of two of the most-corrupt POTUS in recent history head your Board of Directors isn't enough to get you off the hook for sheltering and laundering money for Pinochet, nobody is above reproach.)

Okay, still with me? Banks are required to maintain offices and taskforces to insure OFAC compliance and review accounts and transactions. Problem: there are too many accounts and transactions being accessed every day, too many being created or terminated, too many people walking into the bank and handing the teller or financial-services rep (the average bank doesn't even train branch staff on what to look for.) large cash or official check transactions (These generate reports and paperwork but not enough scrutiny to ID anybody trained to avoid detection). It's not possible to review them all. Problem: The people planning and committing OFAC-violation crimes are very very good at what they do...we're not talking about your average schmuck, we're talking about foreign operatives with the full-backing of hostile states, financial professionals and other highly-trained people who get paid very well to not get caught. Reality: It's an accepted annoyance of bank executives that it'd be a safe bet to assume that every major US bank has at least one and probably several serious OFAC violations in the books they'll never find. The operating wager is that if the people the bank pays to insure compliance and ferret out the violations can't find them, neither can OFAC. As an insider, I know that the bank I work for isn't trying real hard to find the very profitable accounts they're supposed to be shutting down and reporting.

What advantage does the public and indie media have? We're legion. Find the crimes, turn over the proof and publicize them so they can't be swept away...watch the monsters die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrollBuster9090 Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #47
53. Sadly, if the DOJ was interested in prosecuting OFAC violations Phil Gramm would have been in jail
long ago, with all his UBS tax violations.

Having said that, however, I think if there ARE going to be any DOJ actions they'll take place after the 2012 elections (provided Obama is re-elected). I think 2013 might be a good year. That's when a lot of the health care act will kick in, it's when the Bush tax cuts will expire, and (I think) when a lot of Dodd-Frank will come in to effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david_vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
80. For that matter, Diamond Parking in Seattle is an ongoing criminal enterprise eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. hmmmmm....treason of sorts, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Read this! you got what you asked for!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/new-police-investigation-will-probe-computer-hacking-2328625.html

"claims that the News of the World stole secrets from the computer hard drives of public figures, journalists and intelligence officers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrollBuster9090 Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
58. Most likely: Labor Party computers and phone lines were hacked, but not Conservative Party ones.
Their half of the scandal will be that the Murdoch empire didn't HAVE to hack their computers to get information. They were passing it to them directly. Phone records will confirm that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. This bodes well for all of us.
I hope it comes to pass that we do see an NewsCorp free world. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. or at least laws stopping these kind of monopolies....
too much power for one person...or one company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's evil
and he's part of the reason why much of the world has taken a turn for the right, and a turn for the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. He has filled the world with hate, distrust and contempt for our fellow men
Everywhere he has gone he has been a cancer causing misery and bad energy to anyone under his influence.

He truly is a bad, bad man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrollBuster9090 Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #29
59. And SOLD it using pink tits on page 3.
Neither Goebbels nor Stalin understood that the most potent form of propaganda combines large print yellow journalism with soft-core pornography.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. The real test is if Faux falls
I think they are scared and their reporting is getting more extremist. I think Pigboy is starting to sweat too.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. yeah....journalists save their notes so the little guy will be able to implicate the bigger guys
when your boss tells you to break the law you keep the proof if you are a journalist. It is hard to find a fall guy when all the fall guy's have crap on you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrollBuster9090 Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
60. Limbaugh's ratings down 30%. Why do you think he's switched to selling TEA?
The drop in ratings may have to do with the fact that the ratings agencies switched to a new method of measuring the amount of time people spend listening to his pogrom....er...PROGRAM. They used to rely on a self survey method where his supporters would typically write down that they listened to him more often than they actually did. But then they switched to an objective recording method where radio listeners wear a recording device that picks up whatever radio station you're listening to when you're within earshot of a radio. (ie-you can't turn on the drugster's show, and then go down to the basement for an hour to oil your gun collection. You actually have to be LISTENING.) When they switched to the new method they found his ratings are 30% lower. Whether that was due to inaccurate reporting, or just waning interest....I'm not surprised he's now marketing his own brand of TEA, complete with a picture of him dressed up as Paul Revere.

He may have reached his limit when it comes to making money by f*cking up the country, and now needs to make money f*cking up peoples' kidneys instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. I hope you're right
What I mean is what you've written is correct I just hope your predictions come true.
Camping huh, my wife loves to camp but to me an ideal camping trip is to head out to the camp site so as to get there with enough time to set up camp and cook a supper meal then get up the next morning to some cowboy coffee and bacon and egg breakfast cooked over the camp fire then pack up and try to be home before noon. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. really? all that work for one night??
but...two meals is EASY to plan. We did a pot of cowboy coffee and I have a camping espresso maker...couple of minutes on the fire and you have a strong cup of coffee.

It's not that I'm a coffee snob...it's just I like to have a nice strong cup...otherwise I can't be bothered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernyankeebelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm glad your positive. I wish I could be. I hope your right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Roger Ailes is in the wings ready to carry on. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. He won't last long without Murdoch pulling his strings....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. I like your thinking. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Camping will do that! I am so glad you had a good time.
This whole Murdoch thing is about the only thing that's made July worthwhile.

:patriot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. I agree...that and my garden :0)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Great post
I want the evidence of their planned attacks against liberals in the US as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
certainot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. great , except..... talk radio does the heavy lifting
fox ifs the visual icing on the talk radio lie turd pie, but i wish you were right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. yeah...talk radio... we need those laws it is illegal to lie knowingly on the news
like Canada has. That would sure help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glimmer of Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. He is in deep doodoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. and it gets deeper every day :0)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. If anyone thinks Fox News, NY Post, Wall Street Journal, etc, etc...
...won't continue spewing an endless stream of obnoxious right wing talking points 24/7 they are sadly mistaken.

This scandal appears, in the short term, to make it harder for NewsCorp to acquire any more media which is good, but it won't put a dent in what they are doing now. Even if Murdoch and his creepy kid were arrested and jailed, this teabagger media would not go away.

And I can't really get excited about this scandal anyway. I am not shocked that tabloids steal hard drives and hack phones - I bet the Enquirer and other garbage media like it do the exact same thing. That it appears to have been institutionalized is troubling, but color me not particularly surprised.

And lastly, the point that right wing media is so profitable and attracts so many viewers/readers has already been made. If Fox News imploded tomorrow, another propaganda network just like it would appear overnight. There is a big market for the crap they peddle, so don't think for a minute media like Fox is going to go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
38. he lost his bskyb bid, he lost News of the World--the world's LARGEST newspaper
so he is getting slapped down some.

There are not a lot of people with the money and the hate that Rupert Murdoch has. But, you are right. There is always another horrible person waiting in the wings. And we will continue the human story of good vs. evil. I'm just enjoying the fact that we're finally getting some licks in during the battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Yeah, losing the bskyb deal was a great outcome...
We don't need Fox News UK or Fox News anywhere else if we can prevent it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. No you don't! It is like a cancer!
Are you British? Do you think they will make laws making sure monopolies like this can't be formed in the future?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldhippydude Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #44
65. the laws will last
only as long as we a semi honest politician..the next power hungry, willing to make a deal with the devil and you will have the next Rupert... after all he couldn't have got an American toe hold, if it were not for folks like Rudy G.. hell maybe the next S.L.A. will kidnap one of his heirs.. (alas but i digress)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #38
87. small point, but worth noting ... NotW was not the world's largest newspaper.
I think it was the largest English-language, some 50 years ago, but hadn't even owned that title for quite some time. Which is not to say it wasn't a successful newspaper -- it was, without a doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shandris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
27. Until I see his slimy old ass in chains doing 20 to life in...
...Riker's Maximum-pound-me-in-the-ass Security cell, it won't be enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. I'm afraid Murdoch Sr will die of old age long before that trial would be done
would you settle for his son and the break-up of his media holdings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shandris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #43
52. Absolutely.
So long as we can burn the older one in effigy and reenact some form of humiliating burial service. Say, inviting the entire pigeon population of New York City? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrollBuster9090 Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #43
62. I have two words for you: Ian Maxwell
The son doesn't pay for the sins of the father.

Take the Conrad Black story and be satisfied with it. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
34. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
36. Thank you for posting more of the Murdoch scandal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. I was kind of worried I would miss it while I was out of town
but I didn't think about it at all except to think there would be fun things to read when I got home. I stayed up pretty late last night catching up but, I swear, it was really exciting like reading a great book or seeing a really good movie!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldhippydude Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #41
67. i know what you mean..
with all this Debt ceiling crap (smoke and mirrors) i hunger for some good news, I'm old enough to remember vividly the senate watergate hearings..i somehow think the drip, drip, drip of this story is something I want to keep track of..hell we are not even to the "Martha Mitchell Moment" yet, let alone "what did Rupert know, and when did he know it"... thanks for your appraisal and tenacity following this story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
40. k&r...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
42. I really appreciate your updates about the his. K&R :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
45. Your posts have been very informative and valuable.
Thanks!

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #45
50. my pleasure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
49. It's the heartstring hacks that are enraging the British public
...and in turn, keeping the pressure to dig deeper going. A jaded populace can easily compartmentalize spying on celebrities, politicians and police as nasty-business-as-usual. But you don't fuck around with little girls and grieving mothers.

This thing just keeps growing legs and I am, once again, amazed at the way fate forces its will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
51. But what about the US?

Where this beast shows no signs of injury?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firebrand Gary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
55. The United States can break up his organization if need be.
I would have a hard time believing that should this drama jump the pond and duplicate itself here than thats exactly what is going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SusanaMontana41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
57. Thank you for the update. It's hard to keep on top of all this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
61. You do know nothing will happen, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #61
78. His company is bleeding its top employees
head of legal is gone
head of news corp is gone
many editors gone
andy coulson is gone
Les Hinton, gone

Murdoch is losing his biggest supporters. That is a win already. It has taken him his whole career to put this army of minions together and he has lost a bulk of them in a few short months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
63. Prediction---he'll be forced out of England but will only get stronger over here.
'Cause money talks in this country. Hell, we welcome war criminals with open arms if they are rich enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
68. I'm afraid that that's just wishful thinking for the most part.
I doubt this will ever touch Fox News or even most Murdoch operations in the US. Whoever is in charge, they know that fomenting hate from the right is good business, and they will keep doing it.

I also doubt that it will bring down the government in the UK, because the Tories have no shame, and the LibDems are spineless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #68
76. LibDems are spineless because Murdoch has blackmailed them too.
Wait and see - we'll find out he is behind a lot of the shocking behavior we've been seeing from all our Democrats-cum-Republocrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaeScott Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
69. K and R for karma's sake. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
70. Murdoch
I think that the powerful people ("THE POWERS THAT BE") are almost all cut from the same cloth as Rupert here. There are hundreds of Corporate, Institutional and political Murdoch's that have infested our government and Institutions.

The character and values of a typical over-bonused hedge fund manager is remarkably similar to Rupert here. But, we've got to start somewhere and Murdoch going down is A GOOD START.

This is just the beginning of the cleansing of our Worldwide Institutional rot!

-90% Jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
71. Vacation has a way of doing that to you...
I hope you're correct... Meanwhile, I'll try to believe that business will behave more like business.

Can you tell I've not had much vacation for a long time? :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solidbold2011 Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
72. same problem different issue
How has Murdoch's media empire been faring as of late? What are the ratings/circulations numbers?

It's easy to declare something "over". It's harder to kill it.

You could release the Uruk-Hai amongst conservatives and if you told them they were "freedom fighters" against government socialism, they'd cheer as their neighborhood was sacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reader Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
73. Don't get my hopes up.
Would love for all you predict to happen, but if it doesn't, I'm going to cry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
75. Sorry, what was the phrase during the OJ trial, "you can't convict $4 million dollars?"
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 10:00 AM by paparush
something like that.

Same applies here but we're the scale is billions rather than millions.

Maybe the Britts have more stones than we Americans.

Over here, we excuse the telcoms for spying on citizens.

No way any real damage is done to Fox over here.

I'm willing to accept that I could be wrong. I've seen advertisers pull out of Beck's show, from Limbaugh's show, so maybe there's hope?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #75
79. Yes, but look at OJ now.
The sad part is how long it takes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pam4water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
81. Is not thing seems to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
82. Maybe they'll lose Murdoch...but they'll still have Rush and all his FOX friends to
push their propaganda. So until the whole FOX network is taken down...we still have lots and lots to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nikto Donating Member (414 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
84. But WHAT ABOUT MURDOCH IN THE USA??
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 01:53 PM by nikto
I refuse to celebrate until RM is
totally destroyed here *in the USA* as well.

Not before.

We're not safe until America can piss on the ashes
of Murdoch's former empire.



(Note key word: "former")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. + 1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
85. I'm happy for Britain. Really happy. But I ain't dancin' in the streets...
...until I see Roger Ailes' slimy, festering behind parked on a chair in front of an FCC that's looking for an excuse to shut Faux "News" down for good.

THEN I'll dance in the streets.

Nekkid.

And toss silver dollars and little bottles of tequila to the spectators.

Promise.

pessimistically,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC