|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:41 PM Original message |
C-span 2 says Reid plan did not pass. 50 to 49, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. if Sanders opposed it, so do I.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. +1 gazillion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Even Reid voted Nay - it was procedural so they can hammer out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
secondwind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. Back to the drawing board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. harry voted against it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buns_of_Fire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. That sometimes happens. It's some procedural thing that allows them to bring it back up again later. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip_In_Boulder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. It was just a cloture vote that allows them to end debate on the bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 01:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. So, he voted against his own awful bill so he could vote for an even worse bill, just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
5. Tactical 'nays.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dawg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. What kind of gamemanship is this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I thought we had a minority rule govt now. If 40 say no, they win. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dawg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. I thought budgetary matters only took a simple majority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Don't they make up the rules as they go along? Maybe the bill isn't just budgetary. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. So he can call it back and include the New deal as an amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dawg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Plus, I guess he now knows he can have it any time he wants. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Reid does this ALL the time. It enables him to bring the bill back up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 01:02 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. But he's going to bring up the 'bipartisan' all cuts bill, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 01:20 PM Original message |
Whatever it finally turns out to be, yeah. They still don't have a deal, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 01:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Delete - dupe. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 01:27 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. I imagine so, but what does that have to do with his bill and him voting against it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
19. Here's the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
20. Just to clarify ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-31-11 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
23. That plan is irrelevant now anyway.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC