Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm a liberal. If you're a liberal, too, maybe you can tell me: Who the fuck is on OUR side?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:25 PM
Original message
I'm a liberal. If you're a liberal, too, maybe you can tell me: Who the fuck is on OUR side?
It looks like the teabaggers got what they wanted and we got fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. No... they didn't. The debt ceiling will be raised, and they didn't want that

They're all pissed right now too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It was going to be raised no matter what
The real sticking point is - are the trust fund kids going to have their taxes raised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. They're getting the cuts to social programs they do want along with no new taxes.
G.H.W. Bush couldn't deliver that, but Barack Obama is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Only 20 of the House members really didn't want the debt ceiling lift.
Edited on Sat Jul-30-11 10:29 PM by DURHAM D
The rest of them are jumping up and down with glee and laughing at the way the Democrats are being squeezed by their own President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. I know they got want they want, cuz I can feel it in my @SS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
56. Yeah, just listen to the counterparts
That's why we should read right wing media. Listen to rush a little while, to get perspective. Boner caved. The Republicans are enabling the Marxist Obama. Giving him another blank check. Oh, if only boner had balls! He's spineless. He should have let the nation default rather than let Obama have his way.

This discussion so pervasive on DU is like high school level. The average American reads on an 8th grade level, so perhaps it is not surprising that the schoolyard is the only metaphor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. no one. We "don't matter," and yet "it's our fault" when elections reinforce corporate rule
Edited on Sat Jul-30-11 10:27 PM by villager
...and the out-and-crazies win, as opposed to the merely hypocritical and debased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who the hell knows
if WE are even on OUR own side!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Entitlement Man! Our new hero that will fight the republicans and Democrats...
bent on dismantling all programs deemed worthless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeckind Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nobody that I've seen
Edited on Sat Jul-30-11 10:31 PM by seabeckind
Everytime I hear one of our dem congresscritters, they say we have to reign in spending.

I listened to Daley the other day for about 20 seconds -- until he used the magic word "entitlements".

Any dem or spokesperson who uses that word immediately tell me he's arguing from the gop viewpoint.

Anyone who ever uses that word will NEVER get my vote.

Your gdam right -- it is an entitlement. I paid into it and I'm entitled to it. Anybody who says I'm not can just kiss my...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. SS is not part of Govt Spending. Did anyone tell him that?
The SS Fund which belongs to the American People has been borrowed and we want it back. We are creditors of the US Govt. They spent money. SS spent nothing and contributed not a single dime to the deficit.

This is sickening, but not surprising. I want to hear the excuses now from those who said it was not going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
31. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
48. Bernie Sanders is on our side.
And I wish to hell he'd primary Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Dennis Kucinich is on MY side.
And I'm mostly liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. You can't even figure out who you are a fan of...
:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I used to be a fan of many....
Clinton, Gore, Kerry, Edwards and the Dallas Cowboys. But they all disappointed me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dameocrat67 Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
43. why wont he primary obama then.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #43
58. He ran directly against Obama in 2008
Came in a very distance 8th, or thereabouts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dameocrat67 Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #58
66. there is more a demand for a real liberal this time
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. This statement needs to be proven
Polls show high liberal support for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dameocrat67 Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. self described liberal does not mean much
you have to look at issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. So where is the issues poll?
I don't "have to" do anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dameocrat67 Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #73
78. well you just have to not be reading any threads in the past week
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 02:55 AM by dameocrat67
many democrats would like to see obama primaried.

http://www.correntewire.com/the_left_controls_the_margin_and_the_margin_controls_obamas_election

polls that show most do not want social security and medicare cut.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/from-the-debt-debate-to-the-coming-hostage-revolt/2011/07/30/gIQAZrDclI_story.html

you need to get out of the ofa cave more often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
51. Dennis Kucinich pushed me into voting for Obama in the first place.
He hems and haws but is a company man in the final instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. The only answer, from the beginning, was to call their bluff.
Let them shut down the govt. over oil-subsidies and corporate jet subsidies.

Pretty soon the shouting would have been so loud and the Republicans would have shot themselves in the face for elections to come.

Instead, Obama said: "Don't call my bluff!" while offering up all his positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeckind Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. If he invokes the 14th
they will tell their tea guys that they tried but those spend happy dems could not be reigned in.

If we have a deal, we get screwed.

The only option? Get that stupid assed Reid to do a one page bill to bump the limit. Introduce a different bill to stop the wars. Another to kill the bush tax cuts right now. The third to reregulate business and reinstate the anti-trust. The 4th to raise the SS cap.

Get Nancy to do the same thing in the House with all the dems as co-sponsors.

Tell any dem who doesn't get on board to order new business cards without the D.

And then start having a press conference every f'in day saying what the status is and who's holding it up. On each bill show exactly what the effect is on the deficit. We have a CBO -- use them.

Maybe have a running total tote board on the back of Carney's shirt.

What a bunch of f'in losers.

Who's in charge? Yeah, dumb question. NOBODY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stklurker Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
45. bingo!
Correct... everyone is wailing about Obama, and while he definitely is not being strong enough there is NOTHING cooking in the House or Senate from the supposed 'political leaders' to rally around. Harry Reids try has been the only thing even close, Pelosi is busy campaigning to her interest groups instead of kicking some a$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. People who may or may not be running for election in 2012.
If they are not running, you should convince them to run, or run yourself. It is hard work (which is why I can't do it, have my own life priorities), extremely draining, but if we get enough we can do all sorts of stuff.

Get a veto-proof majority in the House and Senate and you can change the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. looks like only liberal ghosts are on our side; like FDR.
I've never heard so much about FDR since Obama took over.
For any other liberal heroes, Steve Earle sang it best:

"So come back, Emma Goldman
Rise up, old Joe Hill
The barracades are goin' up
They cannot break our will
Come back to us, Malcolm X
And Martin Luther King..."

Nothing left but ghosts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
34. A close analysis of FDR's record would show that he was NOT liberal
by the standards that are being applied today. In fact, he was considerably conservative and yielded to the reactionary forces of his day. Truman had more monumental social legislation passed under his watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. Always with the attacks on FDR.
Every chance you get. Real Democrats don't do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #38
55. Reagan Democrats are the New Democrats(tm)
It's the hip, new third way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #38
60. But real Democrats DO attack Obama!
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #60
70. We attack Republicans where ever we find them.
On DU and anywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #38
71. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #34
59. Exactly, this deification is just like the right's of Reagan
Being dead 60 years or more means the details of your political career have faded.

FDR certainly did not get everything today's liberals want. The standard applied to Obama now applied to FDR - why aren't they asking why FDR caved so much and didn't get it all? Didn't get single payer either.

using FDR to bash Obama sucks. It's just in bad faith. Judging by totally different standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #59
77. Funny you should mention the right's deification of Reagan in the same sentence as Obama.
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 09:24 PM by JoeyT
Since that's a bit of a litmus test for a person's political orientation, which one does Obama deify? Reagan or FDR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
37. PLUS ONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. During shock and awe, everyone looks alike. Only difference is the smell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericaIsGreat Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. In government? A handful of people. That's it.
America is not a liberal country and never has been. We've never had a liberal President and likely won't have one anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adhd_what_huh Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. they have exposed themselves and are roundly hated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. We are. The People are. 83% wanted to raise taxes on the hoarding class.
Edited on Sat Jul-30-11 10:45 PM by grahamhgreen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
39. Exactly.
The "hording class". I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #21
61. Why don't the 80% get out and vote?
And vote Democratic rather than Republican?

:wtf:

Voters need to learn this is a republic with elected officials and start blaming themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. He is on our side and has been for decades.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #22
57. Yay Ralph Nader
Happily taking up the post immediately under BBI without saying "Fuck Nader.. nt"

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #22
62. But what has he done?
If he's on our side, why don't we choose to elect him?

this looking for someone out of power to deify is just lazy. At least it's not Julian A. this time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. Beats me. Bernie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. Grayson, Feingold, Wiener, and, oh wait.
Sanders, Kucimich, the Progressive Caucus, I hope. Anyway, it's not even 'our' side. It's the 'little guy's side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Hopefully we can get a real progressive soon to replace Wu to start the march!
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 12:30 AM by cascadiance
I'm going to be studying the candidate field real hard the coming weeks and be f'ing demanding who will be my new rep!

Maybe we need to work on a "quiz" that we can provide to prospective primary candidates during this election to smell out and get rid of the corporatists come primary time. We can then hopefully share and use it in other locales too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #25
36. Unlikely that Wu will be replaced with a progressive. The Oregon district
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 07:23 AM by bluestate10
that Wu represents is moderate-conservative. A democrat will likely win it, but that democrat is unlikely to be a progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #36
53. I know... I live there, but that doesn't mean we can't try to get someone that's moreso...
Even if comes from just talking to someone and understanding their feelings more, it is a goal to get a more progressive candidate fielded in this sort of district is a win. And I do think someone that is more progressive could still win here too. Believe me, I knew that battle when I lived in an even more conservative district in San Diego. I knew that Francine Busby wasn't going to touch public campaign financing as a campaign issue much as I wanted to know where she stood on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #24
63. I had some contact with the Kucinich campaign
It was appalling. I called to volunteer and that made me state chairman. Summer of 2008.

IOW, if these people are so on "our side" why didn't we work to get them elected?

This is just looking to one person to be savior and do all the work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
27. If they take money from corporations, they can't be trusted
In my experience, that generally includes having a corporate job.

So who does that leave?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
28. A few claim to be but anymore I don't trust
them. I come closest to trusting Bernie Sanders but they will make sure he never has any real power backing behind him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftofU Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
29. Hey, I'm a leftist and all hear is ...
....cricket chirps. Good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
30. We are on our side. And if we are on the side of the American worker, then the American worker will
side with us.

Solidarity is the key. Divide and Conquer is the GOP's favorite game. And I see a whole lot of Divide and Conquer in the MSM recently. Its almost as bad as the Obama-Hillary Wars in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
32. Me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
33. Just us.
too bad we can't organize effectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
35. Nobody...
... that's who. Nobody with any power in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
40. History.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
41. We are the change we are waiting for.
I believe a very bright presidential candidate said that a couple of years ago and everyone didn't pay attention, voted and went home and wondered why he wasn't doing what we were supposed to be doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #41
74. Oh, so WE can just go raise taxes on the wealthy, then? Shit, I wish I knew I could go do that!
Thanks for the heads up, man!

:rolleyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
42. The normal political process appears to be a dead end.
So now what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dameocrat67 Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
44. until a democrat primaries this president not a damn one of
them is on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
46. You can find them under the bus with the old, the sick, and the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
47. Sanders
"Socialists" are about all that are left of the left in this country, politically speaking. Sanders would have been a mainstream Dem back in the 60's.

Sure as heck isn't our Democratic President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
49. Nobody Effective. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
50. And Medicare on the table in the 2nd round. The Democratic Party was infiltrated by trojan horses.
All of these bullshit negotiations are kabuki theater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Urban Prairie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
52. Not nearly enough in DC are on "our" side, they pay lip service only while campaigning
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 11:20 AM by Urban Prairie
then we are largely ignored, by them and the MSM.

If there were two separate protest rallies happening at the same time and nearby each other, with an equal amount of teabaggers and liberals within both, which group would receive the most attention and coverage? Which group would most likely be mentioned by their party leaders?

Hint: the one with the misspelled signs, hover-rounds, and wearing US flag-style and/or Revolutionary War-era clothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
54. this sounds like someone in a divorce
A court splits things down the middle and both sides wail "he/she got everything he/she wanted!"

Because they have no perspective or big picture in that circumstance, so what he/she wants is considered to be the middle position so not getting everything he/she wants means that she/he got everything she/he wanted. Or he/he and she/she in gay marriages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
64. we have almost no representation in national leadership....
There ARE liberals in leadership, of course, but they are few and they are marginalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
65. We're on our own it appears.
I include in that "we" Feingold, Sanders, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
67. Bernie Sanders
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 01:59 PM by slay
Dennis Kucinich.. Alan Grayson.. maybe a few others.. not many.. not enough.. :(

not enough real people and too many sell-outs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
68. Well, I'm not a liberal, I'm a Marxist, so yeah
I KNOW whose side I'm on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainstreetonce Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #68
76. The whole thing is one big mess.
mess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anser Donating Member (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
75. We are
The People are on our side.

The Money is not.

Money is used to trick the people.

We lose.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC