Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems silent on tonight's WH meeting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 08:10 PM
Original message
Dems silent on tonight's WH meeting
Silence on Obama Meeting Follows Uproar Over Debt Deal Rumors

"Upon returning to the Capitol from the White House, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin said he had no comment on the session with Obama, who reportedly is in discussions with Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) to cut a deal worth $3 trillion in savings over 10 years with no upfront tax code changes. When asked whether his silence reflected progress or frustration, the Illinois Democrat responded, “Possibly one or the other.”

(snip)

A spokesman for House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said there would be no readout of the meeting, and David Krone, the chief of staff for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), had no comment for reporters walking through the Capitol’s carriage entrance moments after the White House session concluded Thursday evening."

http://www.rollcall.com/news/senate_democrats_volcanic_over_deal_rumors-207575-1.html?pos=hftxt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not a good sign, imo
I take it that they are working on their message. If it was good news, they would have hinted at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Shit. Why is he doing this? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Because killing grandmothers (now that he doesn't have one)
is not as bad as destroying the entire planet.

Seriously, that's the excuse. They must kill me to prevent default.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LetTimmySmoke Donating Member (970 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Because he is the type of personality that when someone disapproves of him...
...he then idolizes that person and tries to win their favor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SusanaMontana41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Otherwise known as the "Need to Please" disease. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Bill Clinton had it pretty bad, but nothing like this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gang of Six’ to Meet With Senate Leadership
‘Gang of Six’ to Meet With Senate Leadership

By Humberto Sanchez
Roll Call Staff
July 21, 2011, 9:26 p.m.


Members of the Senate’s bipartisan “gang of six” will meet with the chamber’s leaders Friday morning to discuss the possibility of moving their deficit reduction proposal through Congress.

The meeting was originally planned for Thursday afternoon, but it was postponed after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) were called to the White House for an evening meeting with President Barack Obama and House Democratic leaders, according to Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad. The North Dakota Democrat and Durbin are members of the gang of six, which put forward a plan this week to cut about $4 trillion from the deficit over 10 years.

(snip)

Another gang of six member, Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), said that the group is trying to work with Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who are developing a process that would ensure the debt ceiling is raised by Aug. 2.

“One of the things we have got to sort through is ... any way we can be helpful to” the leaders, Warner said Thursday.

He added that he has been encouraged by the favorable response to the plan from his Senate colleagues. When asked how many support the plan, Warner said, “It is a growing list and more than a third of the Senate.”


Pitching to the Center

Sen. Warner plans to pitch the plan to the majority leader and to centrist House Dems

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=1531078&mesg_id=1533068
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Lets hope its gets fillibustered
and the "growing list" gets nipped in the bud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Very sensible of them to not feed the rumor machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. But the rumor machine MUST be fed. What will DU do without rumors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Yes, best to leave the people out of this.
:sarcasm:

We'll know enough when it's passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. Or tip their hand to the Repugs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. My guess is that it wasn't about the debt deal. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louslobbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Now that's the kind of transparency in government we should come to expect from the corporate state.
Lou
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I should say.
They know what is best for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. "How to screw most of Americans without letting them know they've been screwed again"
..until it's too late, anyway. ie: "How can we market this poison pill to the populace so they won't know how deadly it is until after they swallow it?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. A poison pill in terms of legislation means INTENTIONALLY inserting something
to wreck it's chance of passing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not standard practice.
There must be something up.

If I was a Republican, I would be a bit nervous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. Secret meetings that treat us like the subject is too complex for us
to understand, lead to mistrust - secret governments don't act in the best interest of the majority of the people.

Bet the readouts of these meeting aren't withheld from wall street (golden sacks, etc.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Obama: "The public is not paying close attention...They shouldn't."
July 11 Press Conference
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/07/11/press-conference-president

"The public is not paying close attention to the ins and outs of how a Treasury option goes. They shouldn’t.... We're paid to worry about it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. i do NOT like the way it sounds - but what the heck is "a Treasury option", anyway??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. Good.
Loose lips sink ships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Torpedo this ship. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. Morning after: Well THAT went well!
Reid said “circumstances have changed” in the wake of media reports that Obama and Boehner are closing in on a $3 trillion deficit-reduction deal that would raise the debt limit and establish a promise to reform the tax code at a later date.

"Reid: The path to avert default now runs through the House of Representative"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1547727#top

Pelosi Outlines Revenue-Free Path Forward On Debt Limit Fight

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi acknowledged Friday that Democrats may reluctantly accept a last-minute compromise to raise the debt limit that involves up to $2.5 trillion in spending cuts, without any agreed-upon plan for new tax revenues.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/07/pelosi-outlines-revenue-free-path-forward-on-debt-limit-fight.php

The dirty rotten devil's in the dirty rotten details.



Pelosi reiterated her insistence that Democrats will oppose cuts to entitlement benefits as a tool of deficit reduction. And she established a rule of thumb for how much help Boehner can expect from her party.

"As far as the number is concerned, the bigger the cuts the fewer the Democrats," she said.
Talking Points Memo on Facebook

But this again leaves open the question of what individual Democrats count as a benefit cut, and how well they'd take to the idea of a plan that didn't include agreed upon revenue increases, or guaranteed revenues in the future.



So SS Cola cut "technical adjustments", or not? Why won't she just speak English? At least, unlike trying decode Pelosi, I THINK I understand what Barney Frank's position is.

In an interview with TPM, Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) -- the top Dem on the House Financial Services Committee -- dismissed outright, and in Frank-esque terms, the idea of reducing seniors' cost of living adjustments, or increasing the Medicare eligibility age. "That's people who've been sitting on their asses their whole lives telling some woman who's been standing on her feet as a store clerk that 67's too early for her -- she should do it till she's 70."

But he distinguished those sorts of benefit cuts from means-testing of both Social Security and Medicare, which he said would be appropriate steps to take to improve America's fiscal situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC