Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joint Chiefs say :Defense Budget cuts could force a return to the draft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:18 AM
Original message
Joint Chiefs say :Defense Budget cuts could force a return to the draft
The Pentagon is considering massive changes to the force — including a draft — amid fears that new and far deeper budget cuts are looming just over the horizon, a top military official said Thursday.

Marine Gen. James “Hoss” Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs, offered a timeline for how deep cuts will affect the force during the next decade, including big reductions in operational budgets, slashing the size of the active-duty force and even scaling back entitlements such as retirement and health care, according to the Military Times newspapers.

http://www.stripes.com/news/cartwright-budget-cuts-could-force-a-return-to-the-draft-1.149228


Sounds like a scary threat.... give us money or we will draft



BTW ..... WHERE IS UNHAPPYCAMPER? I miss his posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm willing to speculate that they're bluffing. On the other hand, a military draft would wake us up
Edited on Sat Jul-16-11 04:44 AM by Selatius
Most current leaders inside the military have said time and time again that a citizen army is not preferable to an all-volunteer army. The argument is that an all-volunteer army is simply made up of people who willingly accepted the risks of signing on the dotted line. An army built on a draft invariably involves the question of whether the soldiers in question even want to fight the war, for various reasons. The Founders of the Republic wanted the US to have a citizen army because they knew such an army is less willing to go along with the leadership on foreign adventures. The erosion of unit cohesion, high desertion rates, and the fragging of officers was a common problem during the Viet Nam War, and it was largely the result of fighting a war that the people (the soldiers) did not want or could not really understand or come to a consensus on. It's far easier to justify a fight defending one's borders and coastlines to an army made up of draftees as opposed to going 10,000 miles away to fight some enemy that probably has not seen America's shores, and the Founders knew that, on top of knowing that a long-standing, professional army can easily be used to strip away the rights of its own citizenry as well as dominate many foreign lands.

The corollary argument is that a military draft would awaken a long-dormant strain of student activism that hasn't existed since the 1970s. If you're the one that is going to die on a battlefield, it may make it very important for you to become politically aware of what happens in D.C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. If you reduce the size of the standing force enough
then a draft might be needed to go on military adventures. The easier and better answer is just not going on such adventures. I think the military should be small enough that such adventures would require both a draft and a substantial tax increase, this would make the whole notion much less popular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I call bullshit, but am in favor of bringing back the draft....
....the draft would bring an end to these corrupt wars in about 10 seconds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, what you said. Reducing the overall size of the military could be a very
good thing.

It might make it necessary to close some (or all) of the hundreds of military sites of varying size throughout the world - and just that would save a butt-load of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. There are over 700 American military bases scattered across the world.
It is a huge military footprint, one that allows the wealthiest in America to exert their influence in countries far from home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Almost anyone from the Vietnam era knows
a draft would have ended the wars america is fighting now..

I think the Joint Chiefs are playing a dangerous political game
this time and I expect to see more to come as their budget
is finally brought back to reality.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. +1 - yep, just about every Viet Nam vet understands that clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
51. agreed...
re-instate the draft, this endless war is getting tiresome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Only if there are no deferments or loopholes that the rich can exploit.
Dick Cheney managed to get six draft deferments to avoid combat in Viet Nam, for instance. Otherwise, the wealthiest arms dealers and contractors will continue to lobby politicians to adopt a militaristic foreign policy for monetary gain and not have to worry about their own sons and daughters getting sucked into the machinery of war. I'm assuming they are not sociopaths and actually care about the livelihoods of their own children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
63. Well, that's sort of true
The problem with a general Draft is who to exclude, because we have to exclude quite a few young people. You see, we have an over-abundance of young people and if you make every 18 year old boy eligible for the draft you have to find an way to only take a small percentage of them but not overburden one segment of society. In other words if a Draft were reinstated we'd have to find many deferments and loopholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
36. True enough
It's easy to be an armchair warrior. Not so easy when you or your loved ones could really die in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. GOOD.
A lot harder to casually start a war with a draft rather than a permanent military class that always needs work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. We're going to need the draft anyway.
Not yet, but climate change is going to destabilize everything and there will be huge numbers of desperate people on the move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Nuke em from Space its the only way.
to kill the Aliens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. now that's gonna
piss those folks on the El Paso/Juarez border off imensely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. Drones and Robots
Star Wars.

Republicans are delusional at more than one level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. I am no republican and think that they are fucking morons.
But future wars will be fought with drones and robots with a small contingent of soldiers controlling the drones and robots from a remote location. As a scientist, this coming fact is both encouraging and scary for me. Encouraging in that american men and women will not be maimed and killed in battle. Frightening because use of drones and robots to fight will dramatically lower the threshold for politicians to use war instead of diplomacy to solve differences between nations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
15. the draft spurred the end of the vietnam war....bring it on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. Empty threat!
The Pentagon does not have the authority to institute a draft.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
17. Defense budget cuts could also leave America open to invasion
by Al-Qaeda's navy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
52. that is almost as scary...
as McHale's Navy :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
18. I say War Budget cuts could result in a return to peace. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
19. From the initiation of the WWII draft until its remission in '75
we were engaged in one war after another, much like we are today. The theory that providing a compulsory stream of cannon fodder to the war machine ends wars is lacking any evidence to back it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
50. It ends mass protests but does not end wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. Make My Day..
... because the day we have the draft these BULLSHIT POINTLESS WARS will STOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
21. The draft should be reinstated. Children reaching 18, male and female,
should have a choice, do two years public service for housing and small pay, or serve in one of the military branches for two years. Those that don't want either choice can either leave the country or be put in jail, either way, they should loose some benefits of USA citizenship. The draft will accomplish three needed changes, first it will make citizens aware of the cost of war or military conflict, so the average citizen won't be so damned jingoistic when a dumbassed politician pushes for a wrong headed military involvement. Second, the public service will provides hands to restore the country's infrastructure and cities. Third, when done with service young people will be more mature and more ready to take on the rest of their lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. I think they should draft the draft proponents first
regardless of age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. I have no problem with that, since as a bright eyed just turned 18 year old, I
stood in the very last draft to happen. Felt that it was the right thing to do then, feel the same way now. The only change that should be made is NO deferrals, everyone must serve active military or in public service jobs getting housing, health care and food in return, but for little pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
55. Good, I will move my kids and family out of the country then. At least they are dual citizens.
Edited on Sat Jul-16-11 02:49 PM by krabigirl
No way will my kids be cannon fodder in these bullshit wars of empire. Nor do I want them forced to work for the government. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. and that's exactly what the wealthy would do
with their own children. a draft would be sending the children of the poor and middle class to war, same as usual. nothing would change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fredamae Donating Member (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
23. Wow! "They" Are Getting Very Desperate
They are pulling all stops---even going "retro-talking point/scare tactics".
As antiquated as this argument is, I wonder how well it will work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Agony Donating Member (865 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
24. kick + rec
yeah... where is UHC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeckind Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
25. Time to quit occupying foreign countries
Germany, Japan, South Korea, Italy, UK, Bahrain,

Oh, and Iraq and Afghanistan

Step 2. Quit using private security forces. Period.

If it's a war zone? NO civilian combatants or military support -- that includes the CIA.

If it's not a war zone? No military other than security for state dept.

We'll look at the other half of their budget later.

Lastly, quit hiding Pentagon spending in DHS and Energy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. ^ ^ ^ + 1,000,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
29. Oh that makes sense. Yes right. Going to pay draftees less I presume?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
54. the reason they get so many...
voluntary re-enlistments is due to the big bonuses they pay for them. If you draft people, you don't have to give them a sign up bonus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
30. And he'll do this how, exactly?
He'll shut the fuck up, soldier on, and do what he needs to do with the people he gets.

We needs LESS people in uniform; wars of cxhoice will be harder to start.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
31. If we had a draft eleven years ago the wars would be over eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
32. I think the GOP should try to push a draft through Congress.
if they're serious about saving money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
33. I thought 'Hoss' Cartwright lived on the Ponderosa
in a big ranch outside of virginia city





Whatever you say general

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
34. Draft Paris Hilton, the Kardashians, the Situation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
35. Oh wait, I thought there were no defense budget cuts
Only social security and medicare.

Guess that's what I deserve for getting the news off of DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. Believe it when you see it

I think its just talk .....

besides social security has jack shit to do with any budget talks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. They have been talking on this for a year or so
Clinton year levels, which is a real cut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. Historically, military "cuts" are actually reductions in increases.
You can't argue that military cuts should be at the top of any budget cutting plan when the U.S. spends more on military than the rest of the world combined. While we debate and wring our hands over what domestic programs to cut, the Pentagon can invade additional countries at the drop of a hat with no questions asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
unionworks Donating Member (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
39. come on
All of you big strong men, Uncle Sam needs your help again!:hippie: :hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
40. K & R !!!
:wtf:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
41. So let me get this straight...cut pay
Instead of toys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. You know. Same old, same old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
43. Pfft

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
46. Bring back the draft.
For every year you serve, you get one free year of tuition at a public state college.

And those fuckers who try to get out of the draft for butt boils, put them on mandatory privy duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
47. LOL ...the shit is flying. The pentagon has no authority to draft pigs in space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. Lately, they seem to be forgetting that they aren't Congress
even more than usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
48. Ya know what? Bring it. And be sure to make it gender neutral, too. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
49. Or, they could send some guy named Vito to break some legs if they don't get their payoffs.
Defense is essentially just another protection racket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
57. How does that work?
Why would a draft be cheaper?

Is that much of their budget actually directed toward recruiting?

Wouldn't a draft mean more soldiers, who all need to be fed, clothed, housed, supplied, transported, etc? Why wouldn't that be more expensive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
58. Scare tactic propaganda. They're full of BS. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
59. This is what they get for increasing our debt by several $trillion n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
60. No cuts have been proposed.
Just a slow-down in the growth of the defense budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
61.  Return the draft
the war mongering politicians and their wealthy pals will never let their little brats put their spoiled buns in harms way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
62. Bring it on........
I've been mostly reading for the last two or three months.

At this point I know that the MIC is terrified of of a $400 billion cut over ten years. If you figure the annual cost of this machine is around a trillion dollars a year, that's (less) than 5% per year. Woohoo, 5% per year. And they are worried.

I do know that the Navy budget is seriously out of whack with the cost of Virginia-class submarine ($5~7 billion dollars each and we buy two a year), DDG-1000 destroyers at $5+ billion dollars each, LCS ships at a half a billion dollars each, and the granddaddy of waste: the US Gerald R Ford at $40 billion dollars or so.

Lockheed is scrambling to get the costs of the F-35 under control, but it's now at 300% of the originally estimated cost ($60 million) and still climbing. Even McGrumpy has been bitching about the cost. I suspect the reported cost will eventually rise to (at least) the $243 million dollars I've been citing for a while. Many of the nations who had signed onto the JSF program have dropped out of the program.

F-22s have been grounded since May due to oxygen problems. The interesting thing: this is the same oxygen system used on most military aircraft.

Basically the DoD's weapons procurement programs have experienced some serious cost overruns. Everything cost much more than the original estimated costs.

And these little adventures of Obama's do not help. At the moment Currently we are killing or droning natives in: Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, Libya & Pakistan.

I'm all for a draft; bring it on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
64. Well, since most of our economy is Department of Defense now, it only makes sense.
And since our "representatives" dislike actually representing us and are doing things now by secret emergency closed door meetings, they will be able to draft us by emergency for the wars we don't support.

You know, sort of like North Korea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC