Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Attorney general considers investigation into News Corp.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
nmbluesky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:26 AM
Original message
Attorney general considers investigation into News Corp.
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said Friday his office is looking into requests by lawmakers to investigate News Corp., the multinational media conglomerate run by Rupert Murdoch.
News Corp. is embroiled in a phone hacking scandal in the United Kingdom that forced one of its top executives, Rebekah Brooks, to resign Friday. Now, U.S. legislators say they want to know if the company engaged in that illegal activity in the United States.
http://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/07/15/us.hacking/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Get on with it Eric
NOW!!

Rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. why, was Newscorp trying to get a medical marijuana license?
that's how we can stop them, someone go to their hq and sprinkle some kind on the floor and then call Holder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. vs. J. Edgar Murdoch
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 10:29 AM by PATRICK
When the open secret that the first FBI director had blackmail files on everyone got too open, Nixon had a meeting to deal with the problem and Hoover dealt with him probably by just sliding a few select copies across the table. From what I remember about the looks on Nixon's face going in and coming out the only mystery was what was in those particular tidbits. Hoover looked grim and powerful. He died in May of the next year and Watergate went into swing a month later.

Heady days.

Now Murdoch is not a bureaucrat. Unfortunately he is a plutocrat of information and propaganda. If he has not been doing his homework on the sharks he swims with as well as the kings,pols,journalists, law enforcement agents, etc. it would be a remarkable show of grace and etiquette. So everyone who is anyone has a reason to fear the "Empire" within. As long as he had made the world safe for cannibal capitalism and the few he could have this wide swathe of power.

But neither does he have the refined desk of power with one protector to blackmail as Hoover had his "loyal" presidents. There is no one man he can go to and raise a single shield of protection. So, I would think, now has come a Nixon panic moment. The pretext is about the scurrilous hacking of vulnerable commoners' private lives. This is connected to the more serious "influencing" of pols and police, journalists and Royals- mostly in the UK.

Now that it is naturally spreading to the US the FBI is literally jumping on the wagon- after journalists HERE are coming forth and evidence of heavy influencing of American government- as any sane person would expect- would make our corrupted system act to save its skin.

So the American pretext handed to them is the scurrilous and dastardly tapping of 911 widows and- the foreign influence laws(which Murdoch also tried to influence).

Treason, espionage, act of war, high crimes and international ones at that would make Murdoch's money influence far second to the implied blackmail. Hence the awkward and desperate attacks by governments formerly at the trough. In all the appalling dirt probably none is worse than hearing 24/7 Murdoch's defenders and "fair-minded" colleagues of the MSM trying to help distance Murdoch from his crimes.

It's sickening. Hoover never got such sycophantic service from the press but he was not one of their own either. Far from secret files stashed in Hoover's office castle, Murdoch's are a sprawling international mess. If he cannot control them he has nothing to deal with. If he dies he need make no threat to release them. They would likely begin spilling out much worse than with Hoover's own messily edited opus. That might also mean he can make no credible deal other than give up most of his ambition and retrench. Unlike Hoover, he also has his spawn involved in a life or death gambit with the powers of the world.

We know far too well how Scotland Yard and the FBI would be told to handle this. Get dirt and pressure for a deal. Mitigate damage to Murdoch. Secure the blackmail material on our beloved global VIP's. Let Murdoch go on prospering with some of that reasonable Third Way compromising. Only, the problem is, these dirtbags are too incredibly overreaching, irrational, incompetent and doomed to make "business as usual" succeed in "the real world(the one you simply CANNOT change). Hardly anything scandalous would bring anyone down these days unless the MSM, in the true Murdoch model, decided to trumpet the hypocritical charge. The chaos however would be more than an embarrassment, another note of doom from Gabriel's trumpet. A moronic meltdown.

Alas, Babylon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Anything to distract from "Fast and Furious".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC