Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge declares mistrial for Roger Clemens.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 10:55 AM
Original message
Judge declares mistrial for Roger Clemens.
Breaking on MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. NY Times link
Edited on Thu Jul-14-11 11:03 AM by cal04
Judge Declares Mistrial in Roger Clemens Perjury Case
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/15/sports/baseball/clemens-judge-declares-mistrial.html?_r=1&src=twr

The federal judge presiding over Roger Clemens’s perjury trial declared a mistrial because the prosecution revealed information Thursday that he previously deemed inadmissible.

The United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton abruptly stopped the trial and scolded the prosecution for playing a videotape of the 2008 Congressional hearings on performance-enhancing drug use in baseball. The part of the tape that worried him included comments made by Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, a Maryland Democrat, about the credibility of Andy Pettitte, Clemens’s former best friend and teammate, who is expected to be one of the star witnesses for the government.

Pettitte testified that Clemens had admitted to him that he used human growth hormone in 1999 or 2000.

The prosuction also played for the jury a part of the Congressional hearings in which Cummings read an affidavit from Andy Pettitte’s wife, Laura. In the affidavit, she said that her husband had told her about a conversation he had with Clemens about Clemens’s use of human growth hormone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Damn, a baulk... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here is a question for you:
How come it is illegal to lie to Congress, but it is not illegal for Congress to lie??


















Seems they think of themselves above any law.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Excellent question. This should be a bumper sticker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Because their statements are not intended to be factual
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm assuming this is do to the earlier mentioned prosecutors misconduct?
I'm not sure what the prosecutor was thinking was going to happen with that video, but if that's the reason for this it's not a shock it's ended in a mistrial. You don't disobey and piss off the judge if you want your case to proceed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. What happened with the prosecutor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Here you go
Edited on Thu Jul-14-11 03:36 PM by Lone_Star_Dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanSocDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. No surprise.


Nobody wanted this trial in the first place. The culture of professional sports is rotten to the core but no more than all the other myths of corporate society. Why 'pick at a scab' so to speak, when so much is at stake. The same affected indifference to un-indicted war criminals.

Most of us around here know it is all about the money. Myths abound, however about the nobility of competition, the unadulterated athletic purity of the participants, the justice of the rules, and the sanctity of the institution. Ol' Rog could have become the proverbial loose thread...that would unravel the very fabric of corporate culture.

As an anarchist, I'm somewhat disappointed with this....

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC