Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will there be a net loss of jobs in the following months?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 01:24 PM
Original message
Poll question: Will there be a net loss of jobs in the following months?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. There will be a
continuing decline in the labor force participation rate with without a net loss of jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because water doesn't run uphill on its own
and nothing is trickling down from the self-styled "elite" 1%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unsure (this stuff is over my head) but there will be a boatload
of new unemployed from NASA, apparently. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. The entire notion of jobs and economies needs to be revamped for the
21st century, but IMO not much will really change until there is a really really major financial crisis.

We continue with trickle down voodoo economics and we know how well that works. Industries that created a major breath of jobs are, as we know, gone. Nothing has replaced the breadth of jobs we used to have. And the demand side is anemic. We will muddle along, and this insane sea of conflicts we live in will ensure nothing gets accomplished.

Hopefully the next financial crisis will fix something and for some it has been one great depression, non-ending. Of course they are kept out of sight, out of mind, for the most part, by MSM.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. There already has been
BLS puts out two surveys in its monthly reports. They are the Establishment Survey and the Household Survey. Unemployment is calculated from the Household Survey.

Links:
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.a.htm
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t17.htm

What you see there is that the two surveys are disagreeing with each other right now. Since April, the household survey shows over 300,000 jobs lost, and the establishment survey shows over 40,000 jobs gained.

But it is important to realize that the establishment survey is adjusted each month by the Birth/Death model numbers, which can be found here:
http://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cesbd.htm
Note that there were big net positives in May and June.

The B/D adjustment is figured from the B.E.D. survey (Business Employment Dynamics). However that survey is always at least 3/4s of a year out of date. This is the most recent, and you can see it is old - this is data from the third quarter of 2010.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cewbd.toc.htm

So what they do is to look at how many new businesses and jobs were created by sector (basically in relationship to the sampled jobs), and then adjust the reports from the businesses included in the establishment survey. Usually this works quite well, and it is necessary, because for a while these new businesses aren't known to BLS so they couldn't possibly sample them. However they do see businesses drop out of their establishment sample, so if they didn't adjust for new business creation, almost always the establishment survey figures would be too low.

However, in times of rapid economic change (positive or negative), the B/D adjustment is out of sync with reality because it is always at least three-quarters of a year behind. BLS always goes back and adjusts its establishment survey numbers as they get more current data, but those adjustments occur long after the month is reported. So for historical research the establishment survey is very good, but it isn't always accurate in the first few months.

The correct way to read the monthly employment report is to look at both surveys. When you see a lot of change and they suddenly diverge, check the B/D adjustment and glance through the other indicators, and they usually will give you a strong inkling as to whether the establishment survey numbers are off.

In this case, due to the rise in initial claims, due to high BKs and non-payments reported in some business surveys, due to the much lower estimate in the household survey, and due to the drop in temporary employment reported by the establishment survey, it appears that the household survey numbers are far more accurate at this time.

So I conclude that we are losing jobs, and the final backup to that comes from the Treasury hospital insurance monthly data, which showed a trend change over the last few months indicating that we are losing jobs. June Treasury receipts will be published next week and we will see what they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC