|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 11:44 AM Original message |
Since when does someone that is prosecuted forced to pay costs of a trial?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. I don't believe it's "the cost of the trial"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catabryna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
2. I think they want to tag it to the four charges she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 11:59 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. See my post below for an estimate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
3. Well, if she was found guilty I could *almost* see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 11:54 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. The things they want to collect money for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 12:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Well lets be honest here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 02:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. The prosecution didn't spend ANY amount of time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
montanacowboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
4. When you continually lie and mislead the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
5. Since those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
6. Well people are ordered to pay court costs all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 11:59 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. She was already ordered to pay court costs in the amount of $600 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 12:02 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. for civil court cases, yes. I don't believe I've ever heard of having to pay 4 criminal proceedings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 04:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
33. god know I've seen divorced people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
8. The Ridiculous "Lawsuits" and other Punitive action against Casey Anthony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catabryna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Nice post... I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hassin Bin Sober (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 12:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. I'm not sure I get what you are saying about #1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 12:24 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. IMHO, Zenaida Gonzales was harmed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hassin Bin Sober (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 12:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Sounds like an iron clad case to me if those are the facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RebelOne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 12:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I am on the side of Gonzales. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 12:47 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Ludicrous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. This is the Prosecutors being very small and vindictive.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
19. Everyone wants to get their claims in first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChoppinBroccoli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
20. Court Costs Are Standard Sentencing In ANY Case Where There Is A Conviction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicalboi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
22. Because she is a liar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
23. Isn't time served her payment of debt to society? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
24. There should be a "No Verdict" choice for the jury....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 01:25 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Oh fer fuck's sake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Are you fucking serious??? In essence you would abolish Double Jeopardy?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 02:45 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Double jeopardy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 02:52 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. If you gave twelve people the option of voting No Verdict, they'd do it all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 03:13 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Try this....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 04:00 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. What part of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 04:36 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. What I want the jury to do is stop listening to the..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 05:08 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. "heinous murder or negligent homicide of that child" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 05:41 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Personally I believe it was a negligent homicide..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 02:56 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. But this wasn't a hung jury. The prosecution failed to prove its case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
COLGATE4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 05:19 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. There is a "no verdict" choice - it's called a hung jury. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 05:47 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. The difference is there.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-08-11 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
39. I believe it's the cost of the investigation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC