Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The wealthy are redistributionists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 08:59 PM
Original message
The wealthy are redistributionists
They take from the middle and working class in this country and give to the poor in other countries.

One of the Republican not-so-secret motivations is anxiety about the hungry and needy. They look on a starving or homeless person, and they see someone who is potentially after their food or who might want to move into their neighborhood. Republicans look on the rich in exactly the opposite way, as people they can potentially get something from. Therefore, Republicans look on government wealth redistribution as taking their "potential something" from the wealthy and giving it to the grasping poor. The wealthy, so the Republican middle and working class think, would be handing out jobs and other largesse to Americans if only the government didn't take the wealthy's money. And those jobs would be going to "the right people."

Pathetic but true.

So we have to use that ugly truth to drive a wedge between middle and working class Republicans and the wealthy. Thanks to globalization, the wealthy are becoming de facto wealth redistributionists. They are letting the "poor, unwashed, grasping" needy in other countries have American wealth. Americans can't afford steak twice a week anymore, because the formerly poor and needy in other countries are demanding more high end food. Americans can't get $40K per year to build widgets any more because the wealthy have given eight $5,000 jobs to the "wretched refuse" in foreign countries.

The wealthy are no longer people you might get something from. They are people who take things from you and give them to foreigners. It's worse than taxes, because the wealthy answer to no voters and take the lion's share of all of the good things that remain in this country. Bottom line, it is the wealthy, not the socialists, who are agents of most wealth redistribution and "forced" standard of living inequality correction. The effect is just global instead of national.

Note: Before I get flamed, I don't think all Republicans think this way by any stretch. Nor do I think poverty reduction in foreign countries is a bad thing. I'm not wealthy, but I do invest a good deal of my retirement savings in foreign assets. And the wealthy are not evil as a class. Most of them are probably excellent people. I know several; they are. If the wealthy invest in foreign countries, it is because they are doing what is best for themselves and their families.

This post is intended as a fairly caustic answer to Republican carping about socialism. It asks the Republican to see something they hate sitting right there in political bed with them. Income redistribution is happening big time right under our noses, but taxes are not the main culprit. Indeed taxing the wealthy may actually slow the pace of income redistribution from Americans to those in other countries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. YES, YES AND YES. Yours is the best post of the evening.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoutherDem Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Republicans love Socialism!
it is just instead of taking from rich and giving to poor, it is taking from the poor and giving to rich. Welfare and redistribution of wealth is what they want, us to them.

Great post, you hit the nail right on the head!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarsInHerHair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. I dont think anyone should have to say "most of them are probably excellent
people"...TOO FEW apparently, because they have not changed the direction nor the impact, that the predatory wealthy have determined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC