Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TEPCO failed to report possible hydrogen explosion (JAPAN)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 01:42 PM
Original message
TEPCO failed to report possible hydrogen explosion (JAPAN)

Smoke rises from the No. 3 reactor at Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant which exploded in March. (Asahi Shimbun)

Tokyo Electric Power Co. knew there could be an explosion at the No. 3 reactor at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant the day before it happened, but didn't report the possibility to authorities.

The failure to notify the central and local governments was revealed in reports submitted by TEPCO to the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI).

The reports were made available on NISA's website June 24.

From March 11 to May 31, TEPCO provided 11,000 documents to NISA and neighboring local governments by fax based on Article 10 of the special measures law on nuclear disasters.

more..
http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201106250160.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lying bastards always lie.
Especially for money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. They Picked a Pretty Tame Picture to Go With That Story
The actual pictures of the explosion must have been too scary:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. a Hydrogen explosion is called a deflagation
The above picture is of the #3 spent fuel pool - not deflagating, but detonating, a very different thing. If you watch unit #1's explosion (which was a deflagation) they look very different. From this detonation, they found pieces of fuel rods 2 kilometers away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Detonation as in
:nuke: you mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC