Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Consumer Spending in U.S. "Unexpectedly" Stagnated in May

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:24 AM
Original message
Consumer Spending in U.S. "Unexpectedly" Stagnated in May

(Bloomberg) Consumer spending unexpectedly stagnated in May as employment prospects dimmed and rising inflation caused Americans to cut back.

Purchases were little changed, the weakest outcome since June 2010, after a revised 0.3 percent gain the prior month that was smaller than previously estimated, Commerce Department figures showed today in Washington. The median of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News called for a 0.1 percent gain. Prices excluding food and energy rose more than forecast.

Walgreen Co. (WAG) is among retailers that indicated 9.1 percent unemployment and higher gas and grocery bills have prompted shoppers to pare back purchases of less essential goods. Federal Reserve policy makers said the restraint on purchasing power may prove temporary as commodities prices start to decline, allowing the economy to pick up later this year.

“The quarter is going to be very slow,” said Christopher Low, the chief economist at FTN Financial in New York who correctly forecast household spending. “The biggest explanation for that is gas prices, so obviously the fact that oil has fallen quite a bit in the last couple of weeks is a really good thing. Relief just in time.” ..............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-27/consumer-spending-in-u-s-unexpectedly-stagnated-in-may-as-prices-climbed.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Can't wait to see House Republicans pass a jobs bill. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. We may not good at a lot of things --
But we're sure good at being surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Getting paid to be clueless.....It's good to be an economist.
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. ...
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Sums it up
and could be cross posted just about in every OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hello, does someone need to purchase a clue stick from me?
I'll even provide free beatings if one so desires...

Lack of jobs, reduction in real earnings for those who have jobs, no more "easy credit", housing market is terrible... now threatened cuts to Social Security and Medicare and other real cuts to necessary programs.

Something is hoarding all the revenue and it needs to get moving again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Makes me F*%*#%g crazy that no on speaks about the obvious.
Edited on Mon Jun-27-11 08:51 AM by Bonhomme Richard
Jobs need to be created (infrastructure would be a good star) and wages need to go up if anyone is going to have anything to spend. That money at the top has to shift downward if we are to save what's left of the middle class.
In time all the security in the world isn't going to save those bastards at the top and if they think it is they are placing a fools bet. Ask Nicolae Ceausescu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CleanGreenFuture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Has anyone else noticed how often that the word "unexpected" has been
used to describe financial news items since the crash of '08?

I swear nearly every major economic report that has come out since then has been accompanied by a headline proclaiming its unexpectedness.

If everything in economics is unexpected, then why do we need economists?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. and after the unexpected stuff, we get a flurry of *well this is better* nonsense
You can almost hear the pr campaign firing up right after these reports drop. The problem is, anyone who can blink and walk knows the bs patrol gets out in force to try to counteract reality.

Orwell is spinning in his grave. Literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinqy Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Why do we need economists???
....To make meteorologists look good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. well, that means profits are down (or less up than they wanted), so they have to cut jobs!
...because they need those profits to invest and create jobs... so they need to fire people, natch.


But we don't dare raise taxes on millionaires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alc Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. there should be lots of job openings for "expectors"
Because whoever's been doing the expecting for the last few years is doing a REALLY bad job. What exactly do these people expect every month and why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. "Unexpected"
Edited on Mon Jun-27-11 10:26 AM by SOS
House value crushed.
Pensions under siege.
Stock market flat for 10 years (no gain in IRA or mutual funds)
Savings receive almost zero return.
Wages never go up.
Health care costs soar.
Food and gas prices up.
Education costs rise every year.
Mass layoffs.
Unemployment at 9%.
Credit tight.
People drowning in debt.

Who could possibly expect that consumer spending might contract?
It's a real shocker!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. But are the bankers OK? The article doesn't say if this will hurt bankers ...
... maybe the administration should send them more money just to be sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC