Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Freeper cites "new scientific poll" as PROOF that HALF of Americans are BIRTHERS. They are SERIES111

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:23 PM
Original message
Freeper cites "new scientific poll" as PROOF that HALF of Americans are BIRTHERS. They are SERIES111
:eyes:

Half of Americans want Congress to probe Obama's eligibility
WND ^ | June 26, 2011 | Bob Unruh

Posted on Sunday, June 26, 2011 2:37:43 PM by RobinMasters

Half of Americans would like to see Congress investigate Barack Obama's eligibility for the presidency and nearly that many believe the definition of the constitutional term "natural born citizen" means both parents must be U.S. citizens, according to a new scientific poll.

"There's no marginalizing those who want this matter investigated by Congress," said Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies, who conducted the WND/Wenzel Poll telephone survey June 16-19. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.85 points.

"Even among Democrats, more than one in four – 28 percent – said they now want an inquiry, as do 43 percent of independents and 77 percent of Republicans. Interestingly, men are much more skeptical than are women about the question of eligibility – only 42 percent of men said they think Obama proved his eligibility by releasing the electronic birth certificate, compared to 59 percent of women."

The poll indicated 43.5 percent of Americans believe that a Hawaii birth would make no difference in Obama's eligibility, as the Constitution requires both parents of a U.S. president to have been U.S. citizens – and Obama's father was not a citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Where in the Constitution does it say that both parents
of a U.S. president have to be citizens? I must have missed that part when I took constitutional law in law school. Or are they just making shit up?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Making it up or clueless
They're merging two separate requirements

•Anyone born inside the United States *
•Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. making shit up, same as always
it says natural born citizen and then does not define the term
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Yeah - McCain isn't a "natural born citizen", according to my definition.
He wasn't born in the U.S. A naval base may be the U.S. legally, but it isn't U.S. soil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. He wasn't even born on a Naval Base. Apparently where
Pop McCain was stationed didn't have a hospital, so they took Mom to a Panamanian hospital. Johnny Boy was born in Panama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. I have trouble with that
penalizing the children of people serving in the military for being born on a base just doesn't sit right with me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Patently ridiculous,
NONE of our Presidents were born US citizens, and certainly not born OF US citizens, until we elected someone born after 1781, or whenever it was that we actually can be said to have obtained our independence. (I suppose a case could be made for 1776). Washington, Jefferson, Adams, etc. were all born before there even WAS such a thing as US citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Got to think Fritz called his friends and neighbors on this poll.
kind of surprised it wasn't 100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Being a member of RimJob's little board does not make one an expert on the Constitution
As it doesn't say a blessed thing about a President's parents in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. The guy who wrote that is either cherry picking or clueless
"...as the Constitution requires both parents of a U.S. president to have been U.S. citizens."

•Anyone born inside the United States *
•Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.

The writer has taken two separate parts and melded them together
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Being clueless is pretty much a prerequisite for joining RimJob's little board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. The writer didn't do it him/herself
Edited on Sun Jun-26-11 07:55 PM by Gman
that's their standard unconventional interpretation of the constitution over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. The Constitution doesn't define what a "natural born citizen" is
There are other laws that do that.

Here's the wonderful dichotomy we're looking at:

Black guy who was born in a state of the US and who joined the Democratic Party: not eligible to be president
White guy who was born in a foreign country and who joined the Republican Party: eligible to be president, but only if he has a fundamentalist running mate who would shoot him after the inauguration with the same gun she used to miss a caribou four times in a row on national television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. And way more than half want US out of our wars.
What's more important?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. So a crazy right-wing organization (WND) paid a pollster
to give them whatever results they wanted, and in the diseased, degraded minds of Freepers, this is a "new scientific poll".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Asking your Mother-Sister and Brother-Uncle isn't a large enough sample size.
Edited on Sun Jun-26-11 07:43 PM by Liberal Veteran
Much like the freeper gene pool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is HUGH!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Freeper and scientific poll
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah hahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. OOPS! Typo on MoE. Should read, "+/- 385 points"
If you want to be "scientific," and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. FIVE PRESIDENTS WITH ONE IMMIGRANT PARENT
Edited on Sun Jun-26-11 08:35 PM by Ian David
FIVE PRESIDENTS WITH ONE IMMIGRANT PARENT

FIVE PRESIDENTS WITH ONE IMMIGRANT PARENT - I called this morning to give Thom information to counter "Cathy" the birther about her false claims regarding Presidents having to have two natural born citizens as parents for them to be legal. It's hard to tell where to post this information on these blogs, so I'll start here and hope Thom sees it.

"Only one president was the son of two immigrant parents: Andrew Jackson. Five presidents ( Jefferson, James Buchanan, Chester Arthur, Woodrow Wilson, Herbert Hoover) had just one immigrant parent each."

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2008/08/immigration-fac.html

http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/President_of_the_United_States_of_America

More:
http://www.thomhartmann.com/forum/2010/09/five-presidents-one-immigrant-parent




Also:

The Seventh U.S. President with a Foreign-Born Parent

With Barack Obama's election, immigrant parents from all over the world can now honestly tell their American-born children that they, too, can dream of one day becoming president. It's a cultural as much as as a racial barrier that's fallen: As the son of a Kenyan man, Barack Obama will be the first U.S. president with a parent born outside the British Isles or Canada.

Only six other U.S. presidents had a foreign-born parent. Mr. Obama will be the first in nearly ninety years, since President Herbert Hoover was inaugurated in 1929.

Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) is the only president born of two immigrants, both Irish. Presidents with one immigrant parent are Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809), whose mother was born in England, James Buchanan (1857-1861) and Chester Arthur (1881-1885), both of whom had Irish fathers, and Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921) and Herbert Hoover (1929-1933), whose mothers were born respectively in England and Canada.

More:
http://community.myvoa.com/_The-Seventh-US-President-with-a-Foreign-Born-Parent/blog/137360/45137.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I see. Another one of you people selling your liberal history view.
You know: Reality based on facts

I predict in a few weeks they'll be insisting that we cleanse the history books of their presidencies as they were illegitimate anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. This is a typo

Its not Wenzel but Wetzel, as in Wetzelbill, our own DU candidate for President.

He is still whining about not winning and having worn it thin here has gone to Freeper world to get support.

Before you know it he will be channeling Randle McMurphy from Cuckoos Nest while being detained at 'the home'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. Mittens is reportedly considering Rubio for VP -- what will the Birthers do then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC