Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Government 30 Billion Dollar Small Business Lending Fund: No Money Spent in Nine Months!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 11:02 AM
Original message
Government 30 Billion Dollar Small Business Lending Fund: No Money Spent in Nine Months!
Small Business Lending Fund: No Money Spent in Nine Months
By: David Dayen
June 22, 2011

I don’t think we’re making enough out of incompetence as a primary reason we’re mired in a zero-growth decade. For instance, the Federal Reserve, empowered with enormous control over the economy, simply didn’t perform well over the last three years in using unconventional monetary policy to give a boost to the economy. They left the real possible actions that could have driven some economic improvement on the table, and what they did end up doing didn’t have much of an effect.

Nearly nine months after its formation, a $30 billion government fund to foster small-business lending has yet to pay out a single dime, even as the nation struggles with traumatic levels of unemployment.

Now, Rep. Sam Graves (R-Mo.) wants an explanation. And as chairman of the Small Business Committee, he hopes his sole witness at a hearing Wednesday — Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner — can shed some light on the holdup.

“This isn’t a witch hunt in any sense of the word,” Graves said. “We’re just trying to figure out why the fund isn’t performing as advertised.”


Read the full article at:

http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/06/22/small-business-lending-fund-no-money-spent-in-nine-months/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rec n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. kick and Rec! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Another wtf moment brought to you by our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bottom line. Banks don't like to lend money to those who really need it.
Try to get a loan for a struggling business if you don't have any assets to repay it if you default. You don't. It wouldn't surprise me if the hold up is the treasury trying to figure out how vulnerable they will be for loan defaults. The banks are not going to take the hit so they want the treasury to write the guidelines and take the hit if the loan isn't payed back.
Keep in mind that the people doing that are probably ex bankers themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Seems Treasury is in charge of implementing it, From the article,
"Sen. Jeff Merkley has been extremely frustrated with the slow pace of Treasury in setting up the Small Business Lending Fund – and urged Treasury last month to pick up the pace,” they said. Simply put, Merkley’s office believes this fund should be the highest priority at Treasury, especially with unemployment so high, and he doesn’t see that kind of commitment yet." Maybe he can kick Timmy in the ass and get him going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Who's that guy in charge of Treasury again?
Oh yeah, Geithner. There should be a witch hunt since he is involved. K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Now, Rep. Sam Graves (R-Mo.) wants an explanation."
I'm sure he does.

Republicans are pushing really hard for more jjob creation.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here
Reuters

<...>

He said that bank regulators, which must approve the requests before passing them onto Treasury, wanted to ensure that capital was not disbursed to banks that are not viable.

"We can't justify helping to keep them alive," Geithner said of such banks.

The Treasury chief said that so far, the program has received 869 applications from banks for about $11.6 billion in capital, or just over one third of the available funds.

Treasury will soon begin to disburse funds from the program, which aims to leverage $300 billion in new bank loans to small firms, which are considered an engine of job growth in the U.S. economy.

<...>

Maybe the Republicans can get rid of the regulators? Speed everything!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Would you open a new business right now?
Edited on Wed Jun-22-11 12:20 PM by SoCalDem
People are in hunker-down mode. New businesses fail more often than they succeed, and small businesses that are truly "small" fail all the time, even after years of being in business. The margins are so narrow, that a few "bad" months can sink them for good.

We have a crisis of confidence (total lack of it for many), and a lessening demand for "stuff". There will always be those who either have money or available credit , and who will buy stuff & go to restaurants,etc. but most businesses have to cast a large net to attract a lot more customers than the "eager" consumers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The article was not about me. But, thousands who want to have not been loaned the money they need.

I see new small businesses open every week.

Many more would open if they could obtain small business loans.

So what's your point?

That all truly "small" businesses always fail and therefore none should be given loans out of this 30 billion dollar fund?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Never said it was about "you"..or that small businesses "always" fail
thanks for playing, though:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kinda hard to complain that businesses sitting on their cash won't spend
When government won't do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC