Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Reich: The Growing Desperation of the Don’t-Raise-Taxes-on-the-Rich Crowd

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 06:51 AM
Original message
Robert Reich: The Growing Desperation of the Don’t-Raise-Taxes-on-the-Rich Crowd
The Growing Desperation of the Don’t-Raise-Taxes-on-the-Rich Crowd
Thursday, June 16, 2011


The much-vaunted Republican pledge not to raise any taxes is crumbling. Today 34 Senate Republicans voted to end the special tax breaks for ethanol.

According to no-tax-increase purists like Grover Norquist, this is tantamount to a tax increase.

The truth is, Republicans are divided between those who want to bring down the budget deficit and those who want to shrink government. Ending a special tax subsidy helps reduce the deficit but doesn’t necessarily shrink government. That’s why Norquist and his followers have insisted any such tax increase – including even the closing of tax loopholes – be directly linked to a corresponding tax cut.

In order to save face on today’s vote, Norquist says renegade Republicans will still be considered to have adhered to the pledge if they vote in favor of an amendment offered by Senator Jim DeMint to eliminate the estate tax. Talk about grasping at straws. DeMint’s amendment isn’t even up for a vote. ............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://robertreich.org/post/6601537237



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. DUers, do read the rest of the Reich piece.
No doubt it will be familiar to those who follow Reich, but more people need to have the context for the current discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sorry Robert, Republicans have *never* wanted to "shrink government"..
They want to shrink certain parts of the government but vastly increase other parts.

How big a government does it take to keep tabs on every single pregnant woman to make absolutely sure she does not have an abortion?

Ronald fucking Reagan never once submitted a balanced budget and indeed the Democratic Congress actually cut at least one of Reagan's budgets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. repubs have successfully reframed ending tax breaks as "raising taxes"
As if tax levels naturally belong on a one-way street downward, and any reversal to a former level equals economic tyranny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Gee. I don't remember Grover Norquist getting elected to anything.
He must have some rich friends. I know people in the "Greatest Generation" who know him don't like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. Did yo see about that jerk Ryan whinning about
Boeings hig tax rate?

I talked to Jim McNerny a couple of weeks ago, their tax rate is extremely high, far higher than their competitors. So when you tax American competitors a whole lot more than our foreign competitors tax theirs, they win and we lose.

As Citizens for Tax Justice found, Boeing has made $9 billion in profits over three years, while not paying any corporate income taxes. In fact, the company received tax benefits of $178 millionover that period. ngs corporate tax rate was? The didn't pay a dime of tax of
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. They're calling them "revenue increases" now. Not taxes.
They've been told not to even say the word "taxes" or else they will face the Tea Party faction!
*insert deep bass chord here*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC