What if he had sent pics of himself wearing various funny hats?

[G_j]

Would they have been outraged if he had sent pics of himself wearing various funny hats in their sacred locker room? I doubt it.

:shrug:

[lame54]

1. depends where he wore them

[G_j]

2. good one

LOL

[liberal N proud]

3. The new outrage is over where the pictures were taken

That place is for Congressional eyes only. If you see it, your eyes have to be poked out unless you are a member.

OH! the outrage!!!!!!


:sarcasm:

[valerief]

4. What if he wore dresses, assuming they weren't exposing 'scary' flesh?

He'd be just like Rudy Ghouliani. Dressing in drag is a Republican value, I think.

[Bluenorthwest]

7. And dressing in drag is bad?

Huh. I have entire troops of Democrats to alert to this new prejudice in the Party.

[valerief]

9. Oh, I love men in drag myself. But I'm not beating on Weiner. I don't think

he did anything wrong. But how would the Free Market Media react if he had sent pix of himself in dresses?

(In fact, my next novel--a WIP--features a hit man in drag. I was inspired by Ed Wood.)

[ljm2002]

13. I must say...

...that dressing in drag is the single thing that Giuliani ever did that I found somewhat endearing.

[valerief]

14. I concur! nt

[hobbit709]

5. somebody would have been outraged, there's always at least one.

[frazzled]

6. This doesn't even approach an argument

epic fail on the basis of speciousness

[G_j]

10. well, what do you think?

As there seems to be so much outrage over where those pics were taken.

[WinkyDink]

8. And if pigs had the proverbial wings?

[lumberjack_jeff]

11. Yes, they would. It's all about "the stupidity" after all. n/t

[rustydog]

12. What?

[Shagbark Hickory]

15. If they were ladies hats then yes.

[Canuckistanian]

16. Unless he lied about it

Which is 100% of what this was all about, to some people. Nudge, nudge, wink, wink.