Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Started Deadly Chemical Strikes From Drone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 03:53 PM
Original message
US Started Deadly Chemical Strikes From Drone
Source: Jazablog

Pakistani physicians and experts reported that the US uses chemical munitions in its drone attacks on the country’s civilians. According to hospitals doctors in Peshawar Pakistani civilians who received injuries from US Drone attacks have affected with different skin, eyes and respiratory diseases, it can be concluded that Washington is using chemical weapons in its attacks in Pakistan.

Due to the deadly chemical materials used in the missiles a large number of the injured people in these attacks have been affected with complicated diseases.
This type of weapons caused wide spread of cancer in Fallujah in Iraq.

Now the point is that despite claim of killing of several high value targets in US Drone attacks why media did not get any information about dead bodies of these high value targets?

http://jazbablog.com/2011/06/11/us-started-deadly-chemical-strikes-from-drone/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+jazbabblog+%28Jazba+Blog%29&utm_content=Twitter

__________________________

note: I can't find other sources that aren't PressTV to verify this yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Edited on Sat Jun-11-11 04:16 PM by Divernan
I know you'll get ten kinds of grief attacking your source. But, hey, let the grief givers come up with ANY articles from sources they accept re the identity of those which US forces claim their drones have successfully targeted and killed. Let them come up with sources which deny use of chemical munitions.

Until "acceptable sources" to the pro-drone group send reporters to where the drones have struck, or medical facilities/morgues where those hit by the drones have been taken, then we are justified in relying on the uncontradicted reports from other sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It still needs to pass the smell test...
If there are claims of chemical weapons, some reasonable theory as to what it might be should be included. If not it is like so much of the crap passing as news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. We have a history of this. It does not surprise me one bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. With what chemicals since Vietnam?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. White phosphorous in Fallujah
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2005/11/21/2625/phosphorus-chemical/

Exclusive: Classified Pentagon Document Described White Phosphorus As ‘Chemical Weapon’

By ThinkProgress on Nov 21, 2005 at 3:33 pm

To downplay the political impact of revelations that U.S. forces used deadly white phosphorus rounds against Iraqi insurgents in Falluja last year, Pentagon officials have insisted that phosphorus munitions are legal since they aren’t technically “chemical weapons.”

The media have helped them. For instance, the New York Times ran a piece today on the phosphorus controversy. On at least three occasions, the Times emphasizes that the phosphorus rounds are “incendiary muntions” that have been “incorrectly called chemical weapons.”

But the distinction is a minor one, and arguably political in nature. A formerly classified 1995 Pentagon intelligence document titled “Possible Use of Phosphorous Chemical” describes the use of white phosphorus by Saddam Hussein on Kurdish fighters:But the distinction is a minor one, and arguably political in nature. A formerly classified 1995 Pentagon intelligence document titled “Possible Use of Phosphorous Chemical” describes the use of white phosphorus by Saddam Hussein on Kurdish fighters: IRAQ HAS POSSIBLY EMPLOYED PHOSPHOROUS CHEMICAL WEAPONS AGAINST THE KURDISH POPULATION IN AREAS ALONG THE IRAQI-TURKISH-IRANIAN BORDERS. <...> IN LATE FEBRUARY 1991, FOLLOWING THE COALITION FORCES’ OVERWHELMING VICTORY OVER IRAQ, KURDISH REBELS STEPPED UP THEIR STRUGGLE AGAINST IRAQI FORCES IN NORTHERN IRAQ. DURING THE BRUTAL CRACKDOWN THAT FOLLOWED THE KURDISH UPRISING, IRAQI FORCES LOYAL TO PRESIDENT SADDAM ((HUSSEIN)) MAY HAVE POSSIBLY USED WHITE PHOSPHOROUS (WP) CHEMICAL WEAPONS AGAINST KURDISH REBELS AND THE POPULACE IN ERBIL (GEOCOORD:3412N/04401E) (VICINITY OF IRANIAN BORDER) AND DOHUK (GEOCOORD:3652N/04301E) (VICINITY OF IRAQI BORDER) PROVINCES, IRAQ.

In other words, the Pentagon does refer to white phosphorus rounds as chemical weapons — at least if they’re used by our enemies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Depleted Uranium in Fallujah
Edited on Sat Jun-11-11 10:41 PM by Divernan
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/07/24/study-health-effects-felt-fallujah-widespread-nuking-hiroshima-nagasaki/

tudy: Fallujah’s health fallout ‘worse’ than Hiroshima, Nagasaki

By Stephen C. Webster
Saturday, July 24th, 2010 -- 2:27 pm
Print 2Share


'Mutagenic and carcinogenic agents' blamed for soaring infant mortality, cancers

In Fallujah, a city just 50 miles from Baghdad, life has never been the same since April 2004, when U.S. Marines declared the entire area a free-fire zone and proceeded to do what Marines do best. Packing the most destructive weaponry in the world, American soldiers laid siege to the city, deploying depleted uranium munitions, white phosphorus and tons of conventional ballistics.

Operation Vigilant Resolve went on for a full month. Though U.S. forces allowed an estimated 70,000 women, children and elderly leave the city, to this day the campaign to recapture Fallujah is beset with allegations of war crimes.

In the wake of America's "shock and awe" bombing campaign to take Baghdad, radiation detectors as far away as the United Kingdom noticed a fourfold spike in radioactivity in the atmosphere. At the time, the Department of Defense bragged that the substance, a nuclear byproduct with a fraction of the radioactivity as standard uranium, is commonly ingested by Americans, in food, drinking water and the air, allegedly with no ill effects. Officials went on to say its use would cause "no impact on the health of people and the environment."

Today, according to a study by the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , rates of cancer, leukemia, infant mortality and sexual mutations in Fallujah are higher than those reported in the aftermath of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear detonations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's a war crime.
When do Obama and Gates do their frog march?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. PressTV = Iranian BS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. More info is definitely needed on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC