Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*BREAKING*: Weiner MIGHT have sent pictures to a 17 Year Old (Minor)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:41 AM
Original message
*BREAKING*: Weiner MIGHT have sent pictures to a 17 Year Old (Minor)
Edited on Sat Jun-11-11 05:59 AM by vaberella
I'm watching MSNBC, while they're giving those autopsy cases. A reporter came on during the break. It seems Weiner might (keep this in mind) have sent to a 17 year old. It's under investigation.

If the above is true---there are no words everyone. He might not have known the women he was dealing with---and that's the key thing---when you're sexting you can be sure of shit. There's no survival here. I seriously can't defend him at this point. I turned when I read how he came into office. But this...this is beyond recklessness.


*Be warned link is Fox News related.
Link to article here: http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/10/report-police-investigating-rep-weiners-communication-with-delaware-minor/

Delaware police talked with the family of a high school girl Friday about possible online messages she received from Rep. Anthony Weiner, according to a Fox News report.

The girl, a 17-years-old high school junior, received a direct message from Weiner on April 13 after following the congressman on April 1, sources told Fox News’ Jana Winter.

The girl went on a class trip to Washington, D.C., where she saw Weiner deliver a speech, according to those sources. Whether or not the message was inappropriate or explicit has yet to be determined.


At this point I don't trust anything Weiner says, so this is a she said/he said thing and shit could hit the fan for all we know. This won't save his career, rumor or fact.

For perspective and by the link provided by two posters below---the Girls mother said nothing was inappropriate. We will see--since MSNBC reported on this about 30 minutes ago.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1275142

For those too lazy to click here you go:

The mother, whose name is being withheld, told The Post Wednesday that Weiner sent nothing obscene — and only sent two brief messages to her daughter about seeing him during an April school trip to the Capitol.

The teen, who idolized Weiner, was "disappointed" in him after his confession.

The mom said she pointedly questioned her daughter about whether Weiner sent her anything obscene, and the girl swore it was all G-rated. "I guess because he knew she was in high school," the mom said, though she added it was weird Weiner would spend any time communicating directly with her daughter.

The mom did say her daughter wrote in one message, "I’m in love with you," but explained it away with, "She’s 17." "None of us will be getting our 15 minutes of fame because of this nonsense," the mom said. "Representative Weiner never tweeted her anything inappropriate .¤.¤. That is the answer, honestly."

Weiner’s office has acknowledged the communication but denied that that it was at all inappropriate. (<----This claim is still maintained by Weiner's office.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, God in heaven, NO!!!!!! No, no, no. Please, no. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I don't know LL. I just updated with a link. It's up in the air right now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
53. It's not up in the air. It was debunked any why anyone needs to keep this going is questionable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #53
70. Keep what going? I'm going by what was on, on MSNBC at the time.
Yet, everyone here is accusing me of being a shill, or working for Fox, having an agenda and so on. Which is absolutely ridiculous. But whatever makes people feel better. If it's in regards to the Weiner thing...it's not about to blow over. It could have blowed over if Weiner had come out the same day when this news broke and saved all this drama. From then on out--shit is going to come out of the woodwork---rumored or fact based and will be reported on major news networks---much like when his first crotch pic was released. That's inevitable. And when MSNBC said there was a police investigation and other articles have said the same---only with the mom taking the daughters word for it has said otherwise. But she didn't see the messages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. This whole scandal was not intended
to merely embarrass Weiner, they want him brought down. He's a hell of a fighter, though, so it looks like this could get really ugly. I wonder what kind of goods he has on prominent Republicans. If he has anything, I sure hope he uses it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. so you are not concerned that the story might be true and that inappropriate
materials might have been sent to a minor?

Only that he is "embarrassed" and might be the target of a misguided R?

Do I have that right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. There's a police investigation under way. So we'll see. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. No, you don't.
I'm talking about Republicans fabricating evidence. They consider themselves to be at war with the Democrats and will do anything to advance their cause. I don't put anything past them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I agree with that. But have there been any indications of that so far in this incident?
There have only been indications that AW has been less than honest so far, as far as I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. He hasn't been forthcoming at all;
I agree with that. But this scandal seems to be timed perfectly. One woman comes forth, everyone is surprised, and then another comes forth just as everyone accepts the situation. It's like a pageant, with each woman taking her turn on the stage. It's going to continue until he resigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drahthaardogs Donating Member (482 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
42. A forty six year old man
has no business texting personal notes to a seventeen year old girl unless they are related, or she was being honored for something. As a father, D or R is irrelevant, he better get my permission before he starts texting my daughter. I cannot blame the R for this. You do not put yourself in situations like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
37. Statements like this are just foolish...
Edited on Sat Jun-11-11 08:46 AM by brooklynite
Anthony Weiner is a reliable Democratic vote, just like every other (D) Congressperson in NYC. The only difference is that he occasionally gives a dramatic speech on the floor of the House, which makes Democratic activists feel good, but has virtually no impact on the development of, or voting on, legislation. Stand by him if you want, but don't suggest that "they" are trying to get rid of him, any more than "we" tried to get rid of Joe Wilson and other Republican blowhards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
38. Yeah, let him blackmail some repukes!
You serious?
Weiner did this, no one else. If he was my Rep, I would ask him to go
but I guess this kind of behavior is a-ok for some.
Put an R after his name and DU would be aflame with vitriol. As it is, most of us just expected more from one of our own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Her mom says no...b.s. sensationalism...too bad they can't focus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Thanks Baby. You might be right. I'll wait to see if any others come out of the wood work.
Because this was reported on MSNBC a few moments ago. So it's not going away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. The girl's MOTHER says he didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I read that. However this has gotten legs and MSNBC reported on it a moment ago.
However, to keep things in perspective I will post the DU link in my post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
55. It's gotten legs ONLY because YOU GIVE IT LEGS. Ask the Mods to delete this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #55
58. I see nothing wrong with my post----YOU should ask a mod to delete the thread.
By the way---How did I give something legs that is on major news networks? I'm not on MSNBC. I don't work for The Post or FoxNews---I live in Paris for gods sake. You and many others on here are being ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. From the OP
"The mom said she pointedly questioned her daughter about whether Weiner sent her anything obscene, and the girl swore it was all G-rated."

That is something different...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelungeonWoman Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. MIGHT being the operative word, here
If there were any merit to this rumor the police would have taken the computer with them when they left the home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Exactly...hence the reason I put in the title in caps and bold. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. This has been debunked, by the family.
You really should delete it. There are several later posts here with updates on the story.

This was a Fox/Drudge story.

The mother of the girl has already stated that nothing inappropriate ever happened.

But the girl WAS harassed by Breitbart's thugs, and you'll never see that on Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I will not. Because MSNBC is still reporting that it is being investigated.
So until this stop---this is officially tossed out of the news machine. I will post it here.

And as I stated this---it was mentioned on MSNBC---however the article link is associated with Fox and is countered by Post article (The Post is not known for facts a lot of the time).

No, the police are investigating and that's what I'm reporting on. Not to mention most articles are saying there is an investigation under way even if the mother/daughter and Weiner denies it...hence the reason I put a might.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. The Fox article is old now and MSNBC repeats old news at this
hour. That article has been up here all day.

Of course the police are investigating, someone called them, but not the parents. Take one guess who might have done that and had Fox at the house before the police even arrived.

The police may also be investigating the two Breitbart thugs who were harassing the girls so much that their mothers complained about it. This girl DM'd Weiner to tell him about it and he removed her, for her sake, from his follow list, to stop Breitbart's goons, one of them an ex-con, from harassing her.

They also were reporting their activities to Daryl Issa's office. So his office knew that an ex-con and his buddy were harassing school girls but did nothing to stop it.

Issa is refusing to comment, so far. I hope the police investigation IS looking into this.

The ex-con said in an interview last week that he was concerned he might have 'legal problems' from what he was doing to 'get Weiner'.

So yes, there' plenty to investigate. I hope they contact Issa again and maybe charge those two goons with a crime. That's the story the media seems reluctant to cover so far. Fortunately we don't need the MSM who always seem to be so far behind the news. And so easily manipulated by Breitbart, as with this police story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
35. Did you read my post? Once Babylonsister posted the debunked link.
I updated this thread and also made sure to state that MSNBC said MIGHT.

I do not understand why this is hard to grasp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #35
47. Because your subject line does not contained the word "DEBUNKED."
If it did, this wouldn't smell so bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #47
57. You think it smells so bad---get a mod to delete it.
Which was the news station I was following at the time. MSNBC stated that yes the Mother says nothing inappropriate was said, however there is a police investigation into the situation. I'll have you know that the Post is basically a rag newspaper as FoxNews is a shit one. I'm not saying MSNBC is great stuff either. But when there is a police investigation into the matter and just word of mouth---it's allowed to stay.

Further more, the article should be sufficient. The moving of the goalpost here is ridiculous. Since I put up the "debunking" article---I don't see your point. Actually I'll doubt we'll see each other. I don't know what you're smelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
24. The police are done investigating - people have posted links exonerating Weiner
...and yet you defiantly refuse to pull this. This makes you a propagator of a debunked rumor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. ~sigh~ I'm not a mod to pull shit.
Edited on Sat Jun-11-11 08:27 AM by vaberella
And when I posted it---it was still on MSNBC. Why oh why can't this be understood? Not to mention I put all of the updates...what is your deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #29
40. I'm concerned about YOUR deal...
You seem unwilling to admit that this story has been fully debunked. You can ask the mods to pull this bogus thread - I recommend that you do so. If not, that's your prerogative. I can only say that if it were MY thread that was debunked, I'd ask the mods to pull it, and then I'd post another thread apologizing for the posting of the first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #40
60.  I am ABSOLUTELY NOT apologizing for shit. Since I dd nothing wrong.
Anyone who reads my post who is not emotionally invested in some way with the case will get that.

I'm not "unwilling"---I just don't trust nothing in regards to the Weiner situation.I think I'm allowed that right, aren't I. I'm not spreading any lies. I'm posting exactly what was on MSNBC at the time. When an individual gave a "debunking" post---since I don't trust the post any more than I trust FoxNews---I posted in my post to keep things in perspective---while reports are saying there is a police investigation---which could be fluff.

You should ask the mods because you seem more concerned about this post than I am. I see nothing wrong in my post--as I stated before. I posted the report as stated on MSNBC, and then updated the thread. You and many others hate the thread and I think you should ask it to be removed since it's such a problem. I never said Weiner did anything...I reported on what I saw on MSNBC and provided links. If you have issue report it with my blessing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. So you won't delete a debunked story--knowing that MSNBC
repeats old news on the weekend--in between its canned prison sagas. Well, all rightee. I guess we now know that you have an agenda. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. No I won't----because I CAN'T! If you want it pulled down. Alert the thread.
The mod I'm sure can do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #30
52. the ethical thing to do would be for you to request it be pulled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #52
61. Ethical my ass. So reporting on something that was on television and different news networks...
Is now on a moral trip? You've got to be shitting me. Since you label this ethical and take it to some god for saken level---you report it. Obviously I must have no ethics or morality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. How does the mother know what was or was not sent to her daughter??
I guess she is just taking the word of her daughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #21
31. Exactly...but don't let that stop the masses. This is why the investigation seems to be in place.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. Agreed...
Pull this thread.:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. Indict Clarence Thomas
We know he committed crimes. Why aren't we hearing about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
think Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Because there's no sex scandal involved....BORING!!!!
People would have to think about a real criminal act and thinking is not in vogue.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
25. If a man is interested in sex that does not automatically make him a sexual predator.
Weiner's relationship with Person A - two consenting adults doing silly things - cannot and should not be considered to be proof that he has a similar relationship with Person B.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
26. Unrec'd - story has been debunked and OP refuses to pull this rumor-filled crap-thread
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Yup. This thread needs to GO. I am sorry. Nothing in MSNBC says
anything else besides, nothing inappropriate went on. Totally debunked. Thread needs to be pulled, please. If the OP won't do it, perhaps the moderators might consider doing it? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. I agree... to leave a debunked post as though "breaking news"
when countless DUers have pointed it out and complained shows a rather unseemly agenda, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Did you bother to read the post? I mean seriously?!
First post was in relation to a news account on MSNBC. Secondly, I added a corresponding article. Third, when the first 4 or so posts---mentioned the mother saying there was no "inappropriate" messages---I posted them as well. I specifically listed the title of the thread with "MIGHT" because that was the supposition of MSNBC, the article and so on.

People are telling me to delete---let me bring to light some limitations. I cannot pull down a post that is already posted after a limited time. If you have a problem---please contact a mod and have a mod loc the thread or outright remove the thread. However this was on the news and it was talked about---and hence BREAKING.

I do not understand why none of this is easy to grasp or to understand. I also dislike the implication you made in another post about me "having an agenda"---the thing was on the news. It was discussed on MSNBC, it was mentioned in The Post---since many of you are talking about the debunking article. So I don't see why this post cannot stay up. Especially since it directly lists the debunked article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #34
46. Your subject line smells...
If you had the opportunity to edit the OP, you ALSO had the ability to change the subject line. But you didn't. And don't give me that "MIGHT" caveat bullshit. Your OP smells... bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #46
64. That's actually a direct quote from the reporter on MSNBC earlier today.
Which is what I stated in my OP. She said "might" and I put it in my title in caps because it could be false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #34
49. This was reported and debunked yesterday evening.
There's nothing "BREAKING" about it, as your headline breathlessly asserts, and a simple search prior to posting would have shown this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #49
65. I saw it earlier today on MSNBC. I'm not in the same time zone as you. 6 hours ahead to be exact.
So please....:eyes:

It was breaking for me and I checked the first page and there was nothing here at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #34
54. You can surely smell the disappointment in Faux headline
Edited on Sat Jun-11-11 09:32 AM by hlthe2b
Surely vabarella will be saddened as well that even Faux won't back her up...:eyes:






Sorry, vabarella, but your agenda FAILS :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #54
66. I'm utterly heartbroken...
:eyes: Thank you for the implied personal attack because obviously I am a Fox Shill. I don't know how I maintain the job of being an Obama Cheerleader and being his Disciple---while I shill for Fox News as a worker. The money is amazing I guess. ~sigh~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. Alert the thread...an unrec doesn't do much. OP also put the...
article that debunked in post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Done. It's another debunked right wing smear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
67. Yes, that was reported on directly from MSNBC Live (at the times of airing)
Edited on Sat Jun-11-11 12:06 PM by vaberella
You even check the time of airing. Since I was posting it around the same time they showed it on MSNBC, since I don't watch FoxNews. The article is just...to clarify it is on different networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #33
43. I alerted on it already...
It's saturday morning - possibly not many mods on right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #43
63. Quite possibly and good for you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zax2me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #26
41. Yea - the original Weiner story was 'debunked' as well
Edited on Sat Jun-11-11 08:55 AM by Zax2me
Remember 'Weiner story done - proof he was hacked' claims and threads.
Think I'll wait a couple weeks on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. You don't have to take my word. Just look at several other posts on this thread...
Hopefully reading comprehension isn't an issue for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #44
73. Which seems to be the same 3-4 people & I keep responding to their circular statements.
Edited on Sat Jun-11-11 12:18 PM by vaberella
1. I will not apologize.
2. If it's such an issue---wait until the mod locks the thread or removes it.
3. And I have nothing to clarify since everything is in the post--from account with an updated part within the link and the debunking thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
39. At 17, I would have lied to protect "my man"
We'll see how this unfolds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
45. the parents not aware of all communications..
this is going to go badly. exactly what i was afraid of...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. They don't have to be..
servers logs can be validated too..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #48
72. Which is what might be waiting to be reported on considering the police got involved.
Edited on Sat Jun-11-11 12:14 PM by vaberella
If it's true he said lewd comments then I can see this being all over the place. If not---then this will blow over. Unless other people come out of the woodwork. We all know how technology works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
50. *****BREAKING***** This has been DEBUNKED!!!!************
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. So why should we believe this girl? As I recall the first girl said there was "nothing inappropriate...
Then the truth came out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #51
56. Even Faux admits the story has been debunked--will vabarella?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #56
62. I posted both links---one with an update, one of the debunked. I think you have issues.
At this point...I don't see why I have to admit shit. I posted ONLY reports on news links. Each links says the same thing---even the news clipping you felt the need to post up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #62
77. If I had posted a link to something that was previously debunked
and being pushed by the RW in order to cause further damage not only to Weiner--but to all Dems, I would be mortified. The mods will not remove this thread unless the OP personally requests it. You KNOW that. So obviously, you have no shame and others here are seeing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #56
81. I would expect Faux to play this down a bit because they would prefer Weiner stays on..
and keep this ugly story in the news for a long as possible because it's certainly helping Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. perhaps....
though it is finally bringing their own hypocrisy vis-a-vis Vitter and others to light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #51
59. That first "girl" was a woman
Or do you know that already and trying to make it worst than it was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #59
78. Not sure what's the technical definition for being a "girl" but she since she is young enough..
to be my daughter... that's a "girl" to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
68. Anything to attack a Liberal, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. Blame MSNBC and the countless other news stations that talked about it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. You, and you alone, are responsible for your outdated false information post.
Edited on Sat Jun-11-11 12:29 PM by Edweird
You posted debunked RW smear and are attempting to defend it. How sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #74
79. Really? I posted it 1 minute EXACTLY after MSNBC reported it.
And I said so in my post. Additionally---I posted the article that debunks this statement. I have yet to defend the article---I defend my posting the statement because I made everyone aware of where it was coming from.

Sure...false information I got from MSNBC today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #79
83. I see. So you 'hear something on MSNBC' and then rush to post a quote and link from "FOX related"
dailycaller.com?
So, not only are you knowingly posting debunked RW smears, you are doing so with full knowledge that it came from FOX.
Understood.
Again, you are responsible for vetting your sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
69. BROKE...he didn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
75. Why can't unrec also come with unkick?
I wish there was a function that would let users dump shit like this off the top of the thread-list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
76. Accusing the mother of lying and some DUers of being lazy?
You're a classy one, Vaberella.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #76
80. I accused the mum of lying? Where...
And the lazy comment is because I barely if ever click on links to other threads. :eyes:

But people like to take my words out of context---but not only that---make up fanciful ideas as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
84. Unrec for reckless, mean-spirited speculation. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC