Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel takes first look at Sarah's email.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:06 AM
Original message
Rachel takes first look at Sarah's email.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/#43362370

No bombshells in the emails, but interesting redactions, like the exchange with Cheney over pipeline environmental issues.


With guest David Korn. Runs just over eleven minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think this is a mini-bombshell
Edited on Sat Jun-11-11 05:43 AM by Syrinx
Apparently, Palin, as governor, used teleprompters in interview situations. Probably still does on FOX.

Mrs Palin has often criticised President Barack Obama for his reliance on teleprompters, but in 2007 it appears she had answers to pre-supplied questions placed in one of the same devices.

Meg Stapleton, then her communications director, wrote in a message to several members of staff: "Energy TV would like an interview with the Governor and I thought this Wednesday might work - the questions are below.

"What we need to do is simply book the Governor’s time, provide the answers to the questions below, use the prompter and have her look to the side and answer the questions for use by the TV station.

I just need help on the answers. It needs to be very conversationally written.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/sarah-palin/8569676/Sarah-Palin-emails-Teleprompter-and-pre-prepared-questions-needed-for-TV-interview.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'd file that under "one more example of hypocracy". I think the Cheney stuff and...
...the involvement of Tawd in government/oil is more likely to produce juicy results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wonder how one would go about getting the unredacted versions?
Probably a lot of good stuff there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Talk to Anonymous, although they're in a "target rich environment" so may not want to waste ...
... resources on this pimple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Anonymous Take Us Away!
Someone somewhere must have these redacted e-mails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC