As soon as he sent out the photo...

[brooklynite]

...he deleted it from HIS account and publicly posted (without anyone asking) that his account had been hacked. However, the woman's account still had the photo, and she apparently sent it to Breitbart who published it the next day.

[PeaceNikki]

1. No, that's not how it went down. The woman didn't give it to Breitbart, one of Weiner's thousands of

other followers who saw it publicly posted did.

What's the point of this post? That it was her fault and not his? Please.... she'd been getting photos from him like this for weeks. So had half a dozen others. This was a powderkeg waiting to blow.

[brooklynite]

3. No - that Weiner chose to lie before any reporter started asking "nosy questions"

[el_bryanto]

2. That's odd. I have to admit to being largely disinterested in this

What's your theory on why he took those actions?

[Fuzz]

4. No, the dude who sent it to bb saw it, then copied and pasted the tweet or

screen grabbed it. He couldn't resend it because it had been deleted already, but he had it on his screen.

[obxhead]

5. Fact distorting thread.

Unrec.

[billyoc]

6. Nono, it was Professor Plum, in the library

with the lead pipe.