Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'He lied about the affair" is the same argument the GOP used in impeaching Clinton.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:38 PM
Original message
'He lied about the affair" is the same argument the GOP used in impeaching Clinton.
So if you say Weiner should resign then you are also saying Clinton should have been impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. HEAR HEAR
They won't get it. Their purity is more important. Sack cloth and ashes for everyone, damn the politics involved....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yup. We are ALL flawed human beings.
Show me a perfect person and I will show you the Second Coming of Jebus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iemitsu Donating Member (524 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. it is especially silly to expect a politician
to be perfect. it is not be in their nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't buy that even though I don't think Weiner should resign
(though I think he will) and I didn't think Clinton should resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlewolf Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. there is a difference between lying under oath and lying about this ...
it isn't an affair... he lied about sending a picture ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clinton was DLC
And I suspect a great many of those expressing their faux outrage think similarly, and see a chance to eliminate a progressive here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yup. It is how the corporatocracy controls liberal politicians.
"toe the line or we will take out the skeletons in your closet!".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. To be fair, they used the "while under oath" addendum
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChrisBorg Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Weiner was never under oath. This is one of the reasons he didn't bring the authorities in on it.
Big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. See post 10.
Edited on Mon Jun-06-11 09:46 PM by Odin2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wrong. DINO "Call me, Paul Ryan!" Bill was impeached for lying under oath aka. committing perjury.
Edited on Mon Jun-06-11 09:44 PM by ClarkUSA
If Bubba hadn't done such a stupid thing, he wouldn't have been impeached.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. So do you think Clinton should have been removed from office?
If no then you cannot also say Weiner should resign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChrisBorg Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. There is a huge difference between a sitting President and a Congressman.
Just to put the under oath aspect aside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Clinton lied while under oath, opening the gate for a perjury charge -
- and that's considerably different than lying to your family, the media, and your constituents. Both are lacking in character but only one is potentially illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. No he didn't but the rightwing message lives on at DU.
It gets so old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Clinton didn't lie under oath? That's not what I understood -
- How do you figure that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Here you go -
Myth: Clinton committed perjury.
Fact: Clinton’s answers were legally accurate.

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-clintonperjury.html

If you are really interested in the truth read the whole thing including the 5 perjury charge rebuttals at the bottom.

Bottom line - Clinton was the best legal mind in the room and avoided perjury because he was smarter than the wall of ass wipes on the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. Reading comprehension is your friend -
- I said "opened the door" - I did not say he was convicted of perjury. His lying under oath made the right and the media scream about perjury charges and it did nothing but make the matter worse and led to his impeachment. Had he come clean in the beginning, it may have all blown over - no pun intended. He may have been the best legal mind in the room but he was sure lacking in common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. So, either you didn't read the info provided or you
didn't understand it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. He lied, but not to the grand jury
He lied during the Paula Jones deposition when asked if he was ever alone with Lewinsky and said no. They impeached him for lying to the grand jury which he did not do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. No. He wrongly accused others of criminality.
That's what bothers me. Not the sex stuff. Not the lying about sex stuff.

He claimed a crime occurred, and people, in their heat to defend him, started naming names and making false accusations.

That really bothers me. It's not ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. I don't remember him specifically accusing anybody of a crime
I do remember him saying that the best explanation was that the account had been hacked. That's insinuating that a crime may have been committed, not accusing somebody of a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. Watch this video compilation and see if you still feel that way
He willingly went on every show in the country for ten days and repeatedly created a story saying he'd been hacked. He didn't even do it well. He can no longer be a spokesperson for any cause, because he--not the media, not others--blew his own credibility.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/06/video-anthony-weiners-brutal-week-the-lowlights.php?ref=fpblg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
43. Some people are morally bankrupt
And so are some of the people willing to excuse anything they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. Actually, I remember watching Clinton admit to his lie.
Because I believed him when he shook his finger at the camera and said, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." I was furious with him when he fessed up. At the time, I thought he should resign.

In restrospect, that would have given us President Al Gore and perhaps an edge in 2000. The Lewinsky scandal that went on and on for four more years didn't do our country any favors. And there wasn't any progressive legislation to be had after that.

I love Weiner's ideas, but he has been wounded. I'd be happy for him to stay in Congress, but I wonder if that's even possible now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. God - you wanted Clinton to resign? Really? Really?
You think Gore would have been able to move some liberal issues. Really?

I will have some of what you are smokin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. It was my first (fleeting) thought when watching. It isn't that I wanted his head on a platter.
And I wasn't upset that he didn't resign. In fact, the impeachment fuss that followed was highly entertaining. But I don't think I overestimate the damage the stupid scandal did over the long run. At the time I was listening to opposition radio (Rush) on a daily basis. It was a daily flogging ... on and on and on and on ... endless.

It isn't that I think Gore could have done better than Clinton. It is that I think he would have been a HUGE improvement over Bush. And I just wonder ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
40. Would Gore have been elected in 2000 as the incumbent?
One never knows what lies on the road not taken, does one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philippine expat Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. I don't think Gore would have moved liberal issues
but there is no doubt in my mind he would have beaten Bush in 2000
as the incumbent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. I get what you're saying, but...
(a) It's a much bigger deal to throw out a President than it is to throw out a House member (oops, no pun intended) who has to face re-election every two years no matter what.

(b) We actually paid a pretty heavy price for Clinton's sexcapades -- the election of GW Bush. Gore was undeniably handicapped by Clinton's Monica scandal. It is definitely arguable that Gore could have/should have more openly embraced the legacy of the Clinton administration -- but the fact is, because of Clinton's sexual misbehavior, Gore felt that he needed to distance himself from it.

(c) Consider this: might we not have been better off if Clinton HAD been thrown out of office? As VP, Gore would have stepped into the presidency, and as an incumbent he might have had a much better shot at winning the 2000 election.

Frankly, I think Clinton's lack of sexual self-control cost our country a LOT. And Weiner's lack of sexual self-control is going to cost progressives in particular a great deal as well.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. It was suspected that JFK was having affairs. Nobody cared.
RW Baby Boomers came to power in 1994 and suddenly human foibles like infidelity meant you had to go. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Well, speaking as baby boomer who lived through those days, I can tell you that the culture
was categorically different. The press did not make it their business to go around sniffing crotches back then, it simply was not done.

There was always gossip, of course, but it wasn't confused with actual journalism.

I think the blame lies more in 24 hour cable news - thank Bush 1's "Desert Storm" and the rise of CNN for that.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
35. I'm not even sure that Clinton's problems had that much to do with Gore
not being elected. If you consider that Clinton's approval ratings went up even during the impeachment procedings, I don't know that it was that much of a deal breaker for most people. It still would have been close, but had it not been for the mess in Florida, we would have had a President Gore, regardless what Clinton's failings were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
larkrake Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
25. what affair?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. Lots of folks seem to be missing that tiny detail it seems.
The media first and foremost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supply Side Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
28. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadEyeDyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
29. I am watching Criminal Minds right now
and realize that I am ashamed of all those sick assholes that think they can shit all over the entire US people.

I am drunk but "fuck you:to you that think this is ok. He has shit on all of us and toforgive him isw a total sukck off. we deserve better. (i deserve better)/


I hate this party.m mfuck you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
31. Clinton lied under oath
It was never a matter of simply lying about the affair. One is a crime against the state, the other is a crime against a spouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
36. Believe it or not some folks do consider blatant lying by politicians to be a bad thing
Crazy I know, but it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Now if we could get them to care about the lies that affect us all instead of crotch sniffing, we'd
be somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #38
44. It seems if a politician would blatantly lie about personal things
then they would likewise lie about more important things. Hard to argue that "yes I would cover an affair to avoid unpleasant questions, but I wouldn't dare lie to cover up illegal campaign contributions just to avoid jail and impeachment".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philippine expat Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
37. Not at all
Clinton should not of been impeached, however he should have resigned
and so should Weiner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
39. Yep. And in this case, there WAS no affair, and there WAS no lying to Congress.
So how one can consider Weiner even remotely as bad as Clinton is beyond me. And I don't think CLINTON should have been treated the way he was.

Fucking nanny stater Dems, buncha prudes, you'd think WE were the bible beaters in this picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
42. That's about as idiotic as it gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
45. Who here is calling for Weiner to resign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC