Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The so-called gurus are out in force this morning saying no president has won a second term in

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 09:52 AM
Original message
The so-called gurus are out in force this morning saying no president has won a second term in
in office when the unemployment rate on election day topped 7.2%

Funny how they seem to ignore the unemployment rate when Obama took office, or whose policies were responsible for that unemployment rate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. we have one of the most lazy corrpt media in the world
if it wasn't for blogs and DU where would we be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. You are absolutely right /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. And the party in power when the unemployment rate was over 7.2% in 2008
Edited on Fri Jun-03-11 09:56 AM by Pab Sungenis
lost the White House.

And the party in power when the unemployment rate was over 7.2% in 2010 lost the House of Representatives and nearly the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Seventeen months is a long way off.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. FDR was reelected in 1936 and the unemployment was twice that rate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I swear people were smarter then....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse.com Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Just a question...
What gurus are you speaking of? Don't get me wrong, I don't doubt what you're saying. Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Look around...
Not hard to find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionessa Donating Member (842 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. Doesn't change the fact it may be true, but it looks at the moment
Edited on Fri Jun-03-11 10:15 AM by Lionessa
like the Republicans are intending on losing. We'll see, actually I think they like a second term Dem in the white house and Rep Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. They forget to add that this president is going to be running against
a party that has done everything in their power to wreck the economy since 1980. I am hoping that the majority of the people will see this. I think most minority groups understand this clearly. It is just the white overlords who reject the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Nobody who wasn't lily white had ever won either, what is their point?
Has any sitting President with an approval rating of over 51% ever lost?



(no I don't know the answer to this, just throwing it out there)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
palmtree guy Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. nitpicking
there was no incumbent running against Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indykatie Donating Member (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Regardless of What the Unemployment Rate is in 2012
Americans will ask themselves if they really believe any of the republicans can or could have done better than Obama. Given the resistance to the auto bailouts the unemployment number would have been much worse. I think the majority of folks will agree that a second Obama administration is better for the economy than a republican one. They have after all used their control of the House to work on everything BUT creating jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wind Dancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. Don't remember a president...
.. ever being selected by SCOTUS, either.

Our media has an agenda and its not in the interest of the common folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. no question about it /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. That's the "liberal" media.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC