Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Petraeus vows to keep civilian deaths to minimum - AP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 01:55 PM
Original message
Petraeus vows to keep civilian deaths to minimum - AP
The last line is the most hilarious.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110602/ap_on_re_as/as_afghanistan

KABUL, Afghanistan – The top NATO commander in Afghanistan said Thursday that he is committed to reducing the loss of innocent lives to an absolute minimum.

The statement marked Gen. David Petraeus' latest attempt to ease President Hamid Karzai's anger over civilian casualties. Karzai exploded in rage after a recent air attack that killed at least nine civilians in Helmand province in the south.

After that attack, Karzai ordered the U.S.-led coalition to stop bombing homes because too many civilians were being killed. It was Karzai's strongest-ever statement against NATO alliance airstrikes and further complicated a difficult relationship with the Obama administration as it prepares a troop drawdown in the increasingly unpopular war.

In a visit to Khost province in eastern Afghanistan along the Pakistan border, Petraeus expressed his "absolute commitment to reducing to the absolute minimum the loss of innocent, civilian lives" during operations targeting insurgents.

"We share President Karzai's emotion about this," Petraeus said. "We are here to protect the people, to safeguard them, not to harm them or their property."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. What more can you ask?
:shrug:

Not killing any is out of the question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The ingrates don't understand we're killing them for their own good.
Not to mention there's an election coming up and our guy has to look tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marblehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. we must kill them
to save them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. ...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Has anyone thought of pulling out and coming home?
That should save lives on both sides. To say nothing of the money it is costing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Such radical nam-by pam-by ideas will never fly
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Right- they now have the Super-Duper Smart bombs - kills everyone in sight and...
leaves no remains of anyone to report on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. "We share President Karzai's emotion about this."
That, at least, is true. After all, we paid enough for Karzai; the least he can do is provide us moral cover when we bomb civilians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. Words ≠ Actions
There seems to be a disconnect here, but if The Man Called Petraeus says it, well . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. Was " a minimum" defined?
"Sorry your baby sister was turned into instant hamburger, but she was in the *minimum* group"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC