Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wisconsin Dems 6. Wisconsin Republicans 0.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:50 PM
Original message
Wisconsin Dems 6. Wisconsin Republicans 0.
Wisconsin Dems 6. Wisconsin Republicans 0.
By Greg Sargent
Conservatives and some political observers are making a big deal out of the fact that the Dem candidate in the closely watched state Supreme Court race in Wisconsin finally conceded defeat today, as had long been expected.

But surely it’s also a big deal that we now know for certain that six Wisconsin Republican state senators will officially face recall elections, while a grand total of zero Democrats may face the same?

Today the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board announced that they have now approved the signatures required for recall elections against the following six GOP senators: Rob Cowles, Alberta Darling, Sheila Harsdorf, Randy Hopper, Dan Kapanke, and Luther Olsen. That means these six elections are definitely moving forward.

Meanwhile, the board has also announced that they are not prepared to approve the signatures gathered by Republicans for the recall of their three Democratic targets. Dems have alleged that the signature gathering by Republicans is fraudulent, and now the board has explicitly claimed that their reason for not approving the recall elections against Dems is that the signatures “have raised numerous factual and legal issues which need to be investigated and analyzed.”

MORE:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/wisconsin-dems-6-wisconsin-republicans-0/2011/03/03/AGDOWdFH_blog.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. What happened to the other 2 republicans we could recall?
I thought there were 8 republicans eligible for recall. While those 6 are the most vulnerable who are eligible, we should still force the other 2 into a recall election just to show we disapprove of them, even if we don't win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We didn't get enough signatures for those.
Edited on Tue May-31-11 05:13 PM by PeaceNikki
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You have no idea how much work went into getting
the six we did get. It is no small feat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Oh, we DO have an idea.
It was a ton of hard work and you are all to be congratulated. It's just too bad that the other two fell short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I don't know if any state has ever tried to do so many at once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. The BBC reported that it was unpresidented
Figures that we need to rely on foreigners to report accurately on issues here. After all, it has nothing to do with sister Sarah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Now help them WIN on July 12th! Donate to Jess King WI 18!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. If Three + Cons Get Recalled
Does Fitzgerald lose his leadership position?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Come On Wisconsin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Will they all face a vote in July or will three of them be recalled later? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC