Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Useful Constitutional Amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 03:51 PM
Original message
A Useful Constitutional Amendment
Let's call this one 2b.

"A well regulated banking system, being necessary to the security of a free state,
the right of the people to regulate banks shall not be infringed."

Amendment 2b to the U.S. Constitutio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Totally unecessary n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'd rather have this one - the 28th:
"No large monetary or non-monetary gifts from non human sources shall have influence over the people's vote in all elections - state, federal, and local, and this right shall not be infringed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. "influence" is too vague nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I'd have to have someone better define that for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. How about "money does not equal free speech" ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. How about this:
Sec. 1: Upon the Passage of this Amendment, the United States Congress is dismissed and new Elections shall be held in the manner and on the schedule prescribed. No Member of Congress currently holding Office shall be further eligible for reelection to any Public Office.

Sec. 2: No Candidate for any Public Office shall receive any Donation, Enumeration, or Honorarium to their Campaign for Office, excepting those Donations made by individual Natural Persons, given in the Manner and within the Limits already present.

Sec. 3: No Corporate Entity shall enjoy Rights of Personhood, and shall not provide any Donation, Enumeration, or Honorarium to any Candidate for any Public Office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sec. 1 would be tricky to pass
but the entire proposal is great. We'd need a huge groundswell in 37 states to pass it, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. We need a strong basis for a Convention
Edited on Sun May-29-11 05:14 PM by Occulus
The dismissal of Congress and the revocation of the rights of personhood for corporations would go a long, long way toward solving our legislative problems. The only way to do that is via Convention- the Us Congress will not consider these items, period.

Yes, all of them. Both parties, just to be fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. This is, seriously...
one of the dumbest ideas ever to be floated here.

You would bar Bernie Sanders or Pat Leahy from ever again holding public office? That's almost as poorly thought through as dismissing the entire Congress, leaving us with none until the next election, thus ensuring an indefinite period of time in which necessary oversight could not be conducted, critical legislation would have no way of being enacted and it would ensure that the "new" Congress would consist entirely of people with no federal legislative experience whatsoever, except for those former members of Congress who weren't currently serving. You would also be removing the individual 2nd in line to succeed the President should something happen to him.

At first, I thought your proposal was meant as a joke. Unfortunately, I now realize you are serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm in love with that one
It should be the law of the land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Section 1 is a total...
non-starter.

For sections 2&3, you need to learn the difference between "enumeration" and "remuneration".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think the one we really need is
"In all federal, state, county, and municipal laws, regulations, and statutes, the word "person" shall refer only to an individual human being and not to any business entity, no matter how structured."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Best one yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here's one I'd like to see:
THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT

Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. America doesn't believe in that one. :-( (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Counting down until the bank-nuts invade this thread.
:hide:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. That just raises the question
2b or not 2b?



Oh no, here come the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune


uhm

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I guess you have decided it is better to suffer .........

otherwise you would not have posted that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC