Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember how the release of the RAW DNA files was the turning point

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 02:52 PM
Original message
Remember how the release of the RAW DNA files was the turning point
in the Duke lacrosse case?

This was when the defense finally learned that there was DNA from several men in the body and underwear of the accuser, but none of it matched any of the 47 Lacrosse team members.

Guess what has NEVER been turned over to the defense teams of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito ? Guess what the police are continuing to withhold, even from the neutral, independent experts appointed by the Court to examine DNA evidence during the appeal trial? The raw DNA data files.

The appeals judge ordered the police lab to turn over this data months ago. What is the lab’s response? That they NEVER release such files and see no reason to do so.

Why are they stonewalling? What are they hiding? What sort of justice allows two people to be imprisoned for 25 years without such a basic right as to examine the DNA evidence used against them?

Another appeals hearing is scheduled for Saturday. Amanda and Raffaele have already been in prison for 3.5 years, without the police having to produce the actual evidence (as opposed to a summary report) that was used to convict them. Will sanity -- and justice -- finally prevail? Or will there be yet another delay?


(This is just one of the blatantly unjust parts of this case, however. Another is that the police were never required to produce an actual transcript - much less an audio or video-taped record - of the defendant's interrogations: even though every room in the building was equipped with audio-visual equipment.) And she wasn't provided with an interpreter for most of this time, or allowed to have an attorney until after they got her to sign a "confession" written by police in Italian. And though the confession was tossed out by the judge for the criminal trial, it was allowed in the civil trial: and the same jury heard both cases at the same time!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. When we get frustrated with out system, just look at others and be glad that ours is as good as it
is. We should still strive for ours to be even better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC